Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:51:08.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Birefringence as a Mechanism for the Broadening and Depolarization of Pulsar Average Profiles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

M. M. McKinnon*
Affiliation:
NRAO, Green Bank, WV, USA

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Shortly after orthogonal modes of polarization were observed in pulsar radio emission (Manchester et al. 1975), a series of theoretical papers (Cocke & Pacholczyk 1976, Melrose & Stoneham 1977, Melrose 1979) were quick to point out that these abrupt, 90 degree transitions in polarization position angle could be explained by a propagation effect. More specifically, the plasma above pulsar polar caps may be birefringent. The orthogonal modes separate because they have different indices of refraction. So, as Allen & Melrose (1982) point out, the plasma is somewhat analogous to a terrestrial birefringent crystal, at least in the way it affects the ray paths of the modes. With very sensitive observations of individual pulse polarization, Stinebring et al. (1984) concluded that orthogonal modes are superposed, meaning they occur simultaneously. This observation is consistent with the birefringence hypothesis. Stinebring et al. also suggested that pulsars depolarize at high radio frequency via the superposed modes. Barnard & Arons (1986) expanded on the earlier theoretical work, and proposed that, in addition to orthogonal modes, birefringence could account for the broadening of pulsar average profiles at low radio frequency and their depolarization at high frequency. The purpose of this paper is to further investigate the suggestions of Stinebring et al. and Barnard & Arons.

Type
Part 4 Radio Properties
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 1996

References

Allen, M.C. & Melrose, D.B. 1982, Proc. Astron. Soc. Aust., 4, 365 Google Scholar
Backer, D.C. 1976, ApJ, 209, 895 Google Scholar
Barnard, J.J. & Arons, J. 1986, ApJ, 302, 138 Google Scholar
Cocke, W.J. & Pacholczyk, A.G., 1976, ApJ, 204, L13.Google Scholar
Malofeev, V.M. & Malov, I.F., 1980, Sov. Astr., 24, 54 Google Scholar
Manchester, R.N., Taylor, J.H., & Huguenin, G.R., 1975, ApJ, 196, 83 Google Scholar
McKinnon, M.M., 1996, ApJ, submittedGoogle Scholar
Melrose, D.B. & Stoneham, R.J., 1977, Proc. Astron. Soc. Aust., 3, 120 Google Scholar
Melrose, D.B., 1979, Aust. J. Phys., 32, 61 Google Scholar
Morris, D., Graham, D.A., & Sieber, W., 1981, A&A, 100, 107 Google Scholar
Phillips, J.A. & Wolszczan, A. 1992, ApJ, 385, 273 Google Scholar
Stinebring, D.R., Cordes, J.M., Rankin, J.M., Weisberg, J.M., & Boriakoff, V., 1984, ApJS, 55, 247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorsett, S.E., 1991, ApJ, 377, 263 Google Scholar