Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:11:36.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atmospheric Internal Gravity Waves as a Source of Quasiperiodic Variations of the Cosmic Ray Secondary Component and their Likely Solar Origin*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

A.M. Galper
Affiliation:
The Moscow Physical Engineering Institute, 115409, Moscow
V.G. Kirillov-Ugryumov
Affiliation:
The Moscow Physical Engineering Institute, 115409, Moscow
N.G. Leikov
Affiliation:
The Moscow Physical Engineering Institute, 115409, Moscow
B.I. Luchkov
Affiliation:
The Moscow Physical Engineering Institute, 115409, Moscow

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Hard gamma-radiation fluctuations with the periods from 4 to 60 min were investigated in the course of balloon flights at altitudes of 30–40 km. Quasiperiodic intensity variations (QPV) were observed with periods of 5 min, 12–15 min, and 23–26 min, those of 5 min predominating. QPV last no longer than several hours, their associated amplitudes ranging from 5 to 20%. QPV were observed both in mid-latitudes and in the tropics, their detection probability for 3h exposure being 0.3. In the total charged component QPV with comparable amplitudes were not registered. Synchronous atmospheric pressure variations were recorded practically with an amplitude 20 times less than that of gamma-radiation. This suggest short internal gravity waves (IGW) in the stratosphere in the range from 10 to 100 km as the most likable source of QPV. Since the temperature profile of the Earth atmosphere provides conditions for superdistant waveguiding propagation of short IGW with a period of ∼ 5 min at altitudes of 110 and 30 km, the source of waves can be well away from the point of their registration. The IGW generation in the stratosphere can be attributed to the resonance caused by global solar oscillations with low l modes. The resonance probability is likely to be due to the hard solar radiation variations which are absorbed in the ozone layer. The coincidence of the frequency oscillation range in the chromosphere and that of IGW in the stratosphere suggests an IGW resonant excitation mechanism in the Sun–Earth system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1983

Footnotes

*

Proceedings of the 66th IAU Colloquium: Problems in Solar and Stellar Oscillations, held at the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, U.S.S.R., 1–5 September, 1981.

References

Claverie, A., Isaak, G. R., McLeod, C. P., van der Raay, H. B., and Roca Cortes, T.: 1979, Nature 282, 591.Google Scholar
Dikii, L. A.: 1969, The Theory of Vibrations of the Earth Atmosphere, Leningrad.Google Scholar
Galper, A. M., Kurochkin, A. V., Leikov, N. G., Luchkov, B. I., Yurkin, Yu. T.: 1974, Pribori i technika experimenta 1, 50.Google Scholar
Galper, A. M., Kirillov-Ugryumov, V. G., et al.: 1977, 15th Intern. Cosmic Ray Conference, Plovdiv, Vol. 4, p. 341.Google Scholar
Galper, A. M., Kirillov-Ugryumov, V. G., Kurochkin, A. V., Leikov, N. G., and Luchkov, B. I.: 1979, Pis’ma v JETF 30, 631.Google Scholar
Galper, A. M., Kirillov-Ugryumov, V. G., Leikov, N. G., and Luchkov, B. I.: 1980, Pis’ma v JETF 31, 693.Google Scholar
Golitzin, G. S.: 1965, Izvestiya Akademii Nauk USSR 1, 136.Google Scholar
Goodwin, G. L. and Hobson, G. J.: 1978, Nature 275, 109.Google Scholar
Gossard, E. and Hook, U.: 1978, Waves in the Atmosphere, Moscow.Google Scholar
Grec, G., Fossat, E., Pomerantz, M.: 1980, Nature 288, 541.Google Scholar
Hill, H. A., Stebbins, R. T., and Brown, T. M.: 1978, Astrophys. J. 223, 324.Google Scholar
Hines, C. O.: 1960, Canad. J. Phys. 38, 1441.Google Scholar
Kodoma, M., Sakai, T., et al.: 1975, 14th Intern. Cosmic Ray Conference, München, Vol. 3, p. 1120.Google Scholar