Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-13T00:51:58.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

2. A Comparison of the Composition of New and Evolved Comets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

B. Donn

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The intensity ratio of the continuum to the molecular emissions was estimated in the spectra of eight-five comets. These consisted of 34 new, 1/a (orig) < 100 x 10-6 AU-1, 31 more evolved with 102 < 1/a < 104, and 20 periodic comets, P < 103 years. In each age group the comets were divided into two distance intervals, the first observed at less than 1 AU from the sun and the second category observed at more than 1 AU. No significant difference among the patterns of relative intensity distribution among four age groups was found. No general evidence for a difference between pre- and post-perihelion observations was found although in a few cases a pronounced effect occurs. Four conclusions are drawn. (1) There is no readily apparent difference in continuum to emission intensity ratio between new and more evolved comets. (2) An intrinsic distribution of this characteristic does occur. (3) Periodic comets with weak continua derived from new comets with the same property. (4) No weakening of the continuum in general occurs following perihelion passage. The infrared evidence for Comet Encke suggests that the faintness of its continuum may be caused by a size distribution containing only particles larger than about 10 μm.

Type
Part I. Physical Nature of Comets
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 39: Comets, Asteroids, Meteorites: Interrelations, Evolution and Origins , December 1977 , pp. 15 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © A.H. Delsemme 1977

References

A’Hearn, M., and Cowan, J. J. 1975, Astron. J., 80, 852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldet, F. 1927, Ann. Obs. Paris, 7, 1.Google Scholar
Bertaux, J. L., Blamont, J. E., and Festou, M. 1973, Astron. Astrophys., 25, 415.Google Scholar
Bobrovnikov, N. T. 1927, Astroph. J., 66, 439.Google Scholar
Cameron, A.G.W. 1973, Icarus, 18, 407.Google Scholar
Delsemme, A. H., and Rud, D. A. 1973, Astron. Astrophys., 28, 1.Google Scholar
Donn, B. 1976, in Donn, B., Mumma, M., Jackson, W., A’Hearn, M. and Harrington, R. (eds.), The Study of Comets, NASA SP-393, NASA Washington, D.C., p. 663.Google Scholar
Donn, B. 1976, in Donn, B., Mumma, M., Jackson, W., A’Hearn, M. and Harrington, R. (eds.), The Study of Comets, NASA SP-393, NASA Washington, D.C., p. 611.Google Scholar
Everhart, E. 1976, in Donn, B., Mumma, M., Jackson, W., A’Hearn, M. and Harrington, R. (eds.), The Study of Comets, NASA SP-393, NASA Washington, D.C., p. 445.Google Scholar
Everhart, E., and Raghavan, N. 1970, Astron. J., 75, 258.Google Scholar
Greenstein, J. L. 1951, in Hynek, J. A. (ed.), Astrophysics, McGraw Hill Co., N.Y., Ch. 13, p. 526.Google Scholar
Greenstein, J. L. 1962, Astrophys. J., 136, 589.Google Scholar
Keller, H. W. 1976, in Donn, B., Mumma, M., Jackson, W., A’Hearn, M., and Harrington, R., (eds.), The Study of Comets, NASA SP-393, NASA Washington, D.C., p. 287.Google Scholar
Liller, W. 1965, Astron. J., 66, 372.Google Scholar
Marsden, B. G. 1975, Catalogue of Cometary Orbits, 2nd ed., Central Bureau for Astron. Telegrams, Smithsonian Astrophysical Obs., Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Marsden, B. 1976, in preparation.Google Scholar
Marsden, B. G., and Sekanina, Z. 1973, Astron. J., 78, 1118.Google Scholar
Ney, E. 1976, in Donn, B., Mumma, M., Jackson, W., A’Hearn, M., and Harrington, R. (eds.), The Study of Comets, NASA SP-393, NASA Washington, D.C., p. 334.Google Scholar
Oort, J. H. 1950, Bull. Ast. Inst. Neth., 11, 91.Google Scholar
Oort, J. H., and Schmidt, M. 1951, Bull. Ast. Inst. Neth., 11, 259.Google Scholar
Sekanina, Z. 1972, in Chebatarev, G. A., Kazimirchak-Polonskaya, E. I. and Marsden, B. G., (eds.), The Motion, Evolution of Orbits and Origin of Comets, D. Reidel Pub. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, p. 301.Google Scholar
Shul’man, L. M. 1972, in Chebatarev, G. A., Kazimirchak-Polonskaya, E. I. and Marsden, B. G., (eds.), The Motion, Evolution of Orbits and Origin of Comets, D. Reidel Pub. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, p. 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swings, P. 1947, Ann. Astrophys., 11, 124.Google Scholar
Swings, P., and Haser, L. 1957, Atlas of Cometary Spectra, Liege, 1957.Google Scholar
Whipple, F. L. 1977, this volume.Google Scholar