Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:22:40.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prison, Islamic Radicalization and the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2022

Luisa Ravagnani*
Affiliation:
Department of Law, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
Carlo Alberto Romano
Affiliation:
Department of Law, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
*
*Corresponding Author: Luisa Ravagnani, Department of Law, University of Brescia, via Battaglie 58, 25121 Brescia, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Radicalization in prison is a well-developed field of research that, particularly in the aftermath of 11 September 2001, has involved academics and practitioners in the attempt to highlight possible push and pull factors and dynamics, as well as useful strategies for preventing and countering extremism inside the facilities. Like every subject of great interest, it has given rise to numerous theories about the possible approaches to radical violence, some even at odds with each other. However, there is almost unanimous agreement that isolation from external society and the inadequate management of the right to profess one’s religious faith within prisons may be elements that increase the risk of intramural radicalization. In Italy, the COVID-19 pandemic interfered heavily not only in the lives of people belonging to free society but also – and perhaps even more – in the lives of prisoners, resulting in the total isolation of prison facilities from the outside community. The dramatic efforts to protect public health have effectively eclipsed every other right, including – for prisoners – practising one’s faith with the guidance of authorized religious leaders. The present article explores how and why these anti-virus changes in the management of the Italian penitentiary could have influenced the risk of intramural radicalization.

Abstracto

Abstracto

La radicalización en prisión es un campo de investigación bien desarrollado que, particularmente después del 11 de septiembre de 2001, ha involucrado a académicos y profesionales en un intento de resaltar los posibles factores y dinámicas de empuje y atracción, así como estrategias útiles para prevenir y contrarrestar el extremismo. dentro de las instalaciones. Como todo tema de gran interés, ha dado lugar a numerosas teorías sobre los posibles enfoques de la violencia radical, algunas incluso enfrentadas entre sí. Sin embargo, existe un acuerdo casi unánime en que el aislamiento de la sociedad exterior y la gestión inadecuada del derecho a profesar la propia fe religiosa dentro de las cárceles pueden ser elementos que aumenten el riesgo de radicalización intramuros. La pandemia de COVID-19 interfirió fuertemente no solo en la vida de las personas que pertenecen a la sociedad libre sino también, y quizás aún más, en la vida de los presos, lo que resultó en el aislamiento total de las instalaciones penitenciarias italianas de la comunidad exterior. Los dramáticos esfuerzos para proteger la salud pública han eclipsado todos los demás derechos, incluido, para los presos, practicar la propia fe con la guía de líderes religiosos autorizados. El presente artículo explora cómo y por qué estos cambios antivirus en la gestión de los penitenciarios italianos podrían haber influido en el riesgo de radicalización intramuros.

Abstrait

Abstrait

La radicalisation en prison est un domaine de recherche bien développé qui, en particulier au lendemain du 11 septembre 2001, a impliqué des universitaires et des praticiens dans la tentative de mettre en évidence d'éventuels facteurs et dynamiques d’incitation et d’attraction, ainsi que des stratégies utiles pour prévenir et contrer l’extrémisme à l’intérieur des installations. Comme tout sujet de grand intérêt, elle a donné lieu à de nombreuses théories sur les approches possibles de la violence radicale, certaines même en contradiction les unes avec les autres. Cependant, il existe un accord quasi unanime sur le fait que l’isolement de la société extérieure et la gestion inadéquate du droit de professer sa foi religieuse au sein des prisons peuvent être des éléments qui augmentent le risque de radicalisation intra-muros. La pandémie de COVID-19 a fortement interféré non seulement dans la vie des personnes appartenant à la société libre, mais aussi – et peut-être même plus – dans la vie des détenus, entraînant l’isolement total des établissements pénitentiaires italiens de la communauté extérieure. Les efforts spectaculaires pour protéger la santé publique ont effectivement éclipsé tous les autres droits, y compris – pour les prisonniers – pratiquer sa foi sous la direction de chefs religieux autorisés. Le présent article explore comment et pourquoi ces changements antivirus dans la gestion du pénitencier italien ont pu influencer le risque de radicalisation intra-muros.

抽象的

抽象的

监狱中的激进化是一个发达的研究领域,特别是在 2001 年 9 月 11 日之后,学术界和从业人员试图强调可能的推动和拉动因素和动态,以及预防和打击极端主义的有用策略设施内。像每一个非常感兴趣的主题一样,它引发了许多关于激进暴力的可能方法的理论,有些甚至相互矛盾。然而,几乎一致认为,与外部社会隔绝以及在监狱内对信仰宗教信仰的权利管理不善可能是增加校内激进化风险的因素。 COVID-19 大流行不仅严重干扰了属于自由社会的人们的生活,而且甚至可能更多地干扰了囚犯的生活,导致意大利监狱设施与外部社区完全隔离。保护公共健康的巨大努力有效地掩盖了其他所有权利,包括对于囚犯在授权的宗教领袖的指导下实践自己的信仰。本文探讨了意大利监狱管理中的这些抗病毒变化如何以及为什么会影响校内激进化的风险。

الملخص

الملخص

التطرف في السجن هو مجال بحثي متطور ، لا سيما في أعقاب 11 سبتمبر 2001 ، وقد أشرك الأكاديميين والممارسين في محاولة لتسليط الضوء على عوامل وديناميكيات الدفع والجذب المحتملة ، فضلاً عن الاستراتيجيات المفيدة لمنع التطرف ومكافحته. داخل المرافق. مثل كل موضوع ذي أهمية كبيرة ، فقد أدى إلى ظهور العديد من النظريات حول المقاربات المحتملة للعنف الراديكالي ، حتى أن بعضها على خلاف مع بعضها البعض. ومع ذلك ، هناك اتفاق شبه إجماعي على أن العزلة عن المجتمع الخارجي والإدارة غير الكافية للحق في اعتناق العقيدة الدينية داخل السجون قد تكون عناصر تزيد من خطر التطرف الداخلي. تدخل جائحة Covid-19 بشكل كبير ليس فقط في حياة الأشخاص الذين ينتمون إلى المجتمع الحر ولكن أيضًا - وربما أكثر - في حياة السجناء ، مما أدى إلى عزل مرافق السجون الإيطالية تمامًا عن المجتمع الخارجي. لقد طغت الجهود الهائلة لحماية الصحة العامة بشكل فعال على كل الحقوق الأخرى ، بما في ذلك - بالنسبة للسجناء - ممارسة المرء لعقيدته بتوجيه من القادة الدينيين المصرح لهم. تستكشف هذه المقالة كيف ولماذا تؤثر هذه التغييرات المضادة للفيروسات في إدارة السجون الإيطالية على خطر التطرف داخل الأعصاب.

Type
Article
Copyright
© International Society of Criminology, 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Torben. 2019. “Approaches to Countering Radicalisation and Dealing with Violent Extremist and Terrorist Offenders in Prison and Probation.” RAN P&P Practitioners’ Working Paper, European Commission, retrieved 22 August 2022 (https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2019-07/ran_wrk_pp_pract_3rd-2018_20190606_en.pdf).Google Scholar
Ajouaou, Mohamed. 2014. Imam Behind Bars. North Charleston, SC: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
Antigone. 2021. “Libertà di culto. XVII Rapporto sulle condizioni di detenzione.” Retrieved 22 August 2022 (https://www.rapportoantigone.it/diciassettesimo-rapporto-sulle-condizioni-di-detenzione/liberta-di-culto/).Google Scholar
Awan, Imran. 2013. “Muslim Prisoners, Radicalization and Rehabilitation in British Prisons.” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 33(3):371–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baaken, Till, Korn, Judy, Ruf, Maximilian, and Walkenhorst, Dennis. 2020. “Dissecting Deradicalization: Challenges for Theory and Practice in Germany.” International Journal of Conflict and Violence 14(2):118.Google Scholar
Ciluffo, Frank, Gregory Saathoff, Jan Lane, Jeffrey Raynor, Sharon Cardash, Josh Magarik, Arnold Bogis, Whitehead, Andrew, and Lohr, Gina. 2006. “Out of the Shadows: Getting Ahead of Prisoners’ Radicalization.” Charlottesville, VA: Critical Incident Analysis Group, University of Virginia, retrieved 22 August 2022 (https://med.virginia.edu/ciag/wp-content/uploads/sites/313/2015/12/out_of_the_shadows.pdf).Google Scholar
De Pascale, Andrea. 2017. “Intervista con Massimo Campanini, che ci racconta cos’è, come è nato e come si sta trasformando il fondamentalismo islamico.” TPI, 22 March 2016, retrieved 22 August 2022 (https://www.tpi.it/esteri/massimo-campanini-fondamentalismo-islamico-isis-201603229688/).Google Scholar
Durnescu, Ioan, Montero Pérez de Tudela, Esther, and Ravagnani, Luisa. 2016. “Prisoner Transfer and the Importance of the ‘Release Effect’.” Criminology & Criminal Justice 17(4):450–67.Google Scholar
El-Amraoui, Anaïs F and Ducol, Benjamin. 2019. “Family-Oriented P/CVE Programs: Overview, Challenges and Future Directions.” Journal for Deradicalization 20:190231.Google Scholar
Garante nazionale dei diritti delle persone private della libertà personale. 2020. “Circolari.” Retrieved 1 September 2022 (https://www.garantenazionaleprivatiliberta.it/gnpl/pages/it/homepage/circolari/).Google Scholar
Hamm, Mark S. 2013. The Spectacular Few: Prisoner Radicalization and the Evolving Terrorist Threat. New York: NYU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Istituto Superiore di Studi Penitenziari. 2012. “La radicalizzazione del terrorismo islamico: Elementi per uno studio del fenomeno del proselitismo in carcere.” Quaderno n° 9, accessed 22 August 2022 (https://www.giustizia.it/cmsresources/cms/documents/radicalizzazione__del__terrorismo_islamico.pdf).Google Scholar
Jones, Clarke R. 2014. “Are Prisons Really Schools for Terrorism? Challenging the Rhetoric on Prisoner Radicalization.” Punishment & Society 16(1):74103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, Zebun Nisa. 2016. “Role of Education in Building Social Cohesion.” International Journal of Secondary Education 4(2):23–6.Google Scholar
King, Roy D. and McDermott, Kathleen. 1990. “‘My Geranium is Subversive’: Some Notes on the Management of Trouble in Prisons.” British Journal of Sociology 41(4):445–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruglanski, Arie W., Gelfand, Michele J., Bélanger, Jocelyn J., Sheveland, Anna, Hetiarachchi, Malkanthi, and Gunaratna, Rohan. 2014. “The Psychology of Radicalization and Deradicalization: How Significance Quest Impacts Violent Extremism.” Political Psychology 35(Suppl. 1):6993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministero della Giustizia. 2020. “Detenuti italiani e stranieri presenti e capienze per istituto - aggiornamento al 31 maggio 2020.” 31 May 2020, retrieved 1 September 2022 (https://www.giustizia.it/giustizia/it/mg_1_14_1.page?facetNode_1=0_2&facetNode_2=1_5_43&facetNode_3=1_5_43_16&contentId=SST276692&previsiousPage=mg_1_14).Google Scholar
Montero Pérez de Tudela, Esther and Ravagnani, Luisa. 2016. “La población penitenciaria en España y Italia. Estudio comparativo de la situación de la población carcelaria extranjera en ambos países.” Revista Electrónica de Ciencia Penal y Criminología 18-09:1–32, retrieved 22 August 2022 (http://criminet.ugr.es/recpc/18/recpc18-09.pdf).Google Scholar
Mulcahy, Elizabeth, Merrington, Shannon, and James Bell, Peter. 2013. “The Radicalisation of Prison Inmates: A Review of the Literature on Recruitment, Religion and Prisoner Vulnerability.Journal of Human Security 9(1):414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OSCE. 2020. “Non-Custodial Rehabilitation and Reintegration in Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism and Radicalization that Lead to Terrorism: A Guidebook for Policymakers and Practitioners in South-Eastern Europe.” Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, retrieved 22 August 2022 (https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/d/7/444838.pdf).Google Scholar
Pisoiu, Daniela. 2019. “RAN P&P and RAN YF&C Multi-Agency Meeting – ‘Radicalised and Terrorist Offenders Released from Prison: Community and Family Acceptance’, 6–7 June 2019, Prague (CZ): Radicalised and Terrorist Offenders Released from Prison: Community and Family Acceptance.” European Commission, 1 August 2019, retrieved 22 August 2022 (https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/networks/radicalisation_awareness_network/ran-papers/docs/ran_pp_yfc_community_family_acceptance_prague_20190606_en.pdf).Google Scholar
Radicalisation Awareness Network. 2018. “The Role of Family and Social Networks in the Rehabilitation of (Violent) Extremist and Terrorist Offenders.” RAN Ex Post Paper, RAN Centre of Excellence, European Commission, retrieved 22 August 2022 (https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/system/files_en?file=2020-09/ran_pp_role_family_social_networks_rehabilitation_extremist_terrorist_offenders_06-07_03_2018_en.pdf).Google Scholar
Ravagnani, Luisa. 2021. “Rehabilitation Work with Convicted Offenders Outside of Prison.” European Commission Radicalisation Awareness Network, retrieved 22 August 2022 (https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/networks/radicalisation-awareness-network-ran/publications/rehabilitation-work-convicted-offenders-outside-prison-2021_en).Google Scholar
Ravagnani, Luisa and Alberto Romano, Carlo. 2017. “Il radicalismo in carcere: una ricerca empirica.” Rassegna Italiana di Criminologia XI(4):277–96.Google Scholar
Ravagnani, Luisa and Alberto Romano, Carlo. 2019. “P4HR: i diritti umani entrano nel trattamento penitenziario.” Rassegna Italiana di Criminologia XIII(3):217–23.Google Scholar
Rink, Anselm and Sharma, Kunaal. 2018. “The Determinants of Religious Radicalization: Evidence from Kenya.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 62(6):1229–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz Yamuza, Florentino-Gregorio and Ravagnani, Luisa. 2018. “Countering Islamic Radicalisation in Prison through Restorative Justice Based Programmes.” ERA Forum 18:611–26.Google Scholar
Servizio Informazione Religiosa Agenzia d’informazione. 2020. “Carceri: UCOII, rinnovato il protocollo con il DAP del Ministero della Giustizia.” 6 June 2020, retrieved 22 August 2022 (https://www.agensir.it/quotidiano/2020/6/6/carceri-ucoii-rinnovato-il-protocollo-con-il-dap-del-ministero-della-giustizia/).Google Scholar
Silke, Andrew and Veldhuis, Tinka. 2017. “Countering Violent Extremism in Prisons: A Review of Key Recent Research and Critical Research Gaps.” Perspectives on Terrorism 11(5):211.Google Scholar
Soufan Centre. 2020. “IntelBrief: The Coronavirus Will Increase Extremism Across the Ideological Spectrum.” 13 April 2020, retrieved 22 August 2022 (https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-the-coronavirus-will-increase-extremism-across-the-ideological-spectrum/).Google Scholar
United Nations. 1996. “2. Plan of Action for the United Nations Decade for Human Rights Education, 1995–2004 (1996).” A/51/506/Add.1, 12 December 1996, retrieved 22 August 2022 (https://www.ohchr.org/en/resources/educators/human-rights-education-training/2-plan-action-united-nations-decade-human-rights-education-1995-2004-1996).Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. 2016. Handbook on the Management of Violent Extremist Prisoners and the Prevention of Radicalization to Violence in Prisons. New York, retrieved 22 August 2022 (https://www.unodc.org/pdf/criminal_justice/Handbook_on_VEPs.pdf).Google Scholar
Vellenga, Sipco and De Groot, Kees. 2019. “Securitization, Islamic Chaplaincy, and the Issue of (De)radicalization of Muslim Detainees in Dutch Prisons.” Social Compass 66(2):224–37.Google Scholar
Williams, Ryan J. 2016. “Approaches to Violent Extremist Offenders and Countering Radicalisation in Prison and Probation.” RAN P&P Practitioners’ Working Paper, 2nd ed., European Commission, retrieved 22 August 2022 (https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2020-09/ran_pp_approaches_to_violent_extremist_en.pdf).Google Scholar