No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Tort Liability of Public Authorities in Comparative Perspective. Edited by Duncan FAIRGRIEVE, MADS ANDENAS, and JOHN BELL with a foreword by the RT HON LADY JUSTICE ARDEN DBE [London: BIICL, 2002. 581pp. ISBN 0-903067-72-2]
Review products
Tort Liability of Public Authorities in Comparative Perspective. Edited by Duncan FAIRGRIEVE, MADS ANDENAS, and JOHN BELL with a foreword by the RT HON LADY JUSTICE ARDEN DBE [London: BIICL, 2002. 581pp. ISBN 0-903067-72-2]
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 January 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2004
References
1 For example, in the United Kingdom, prior to the Crown Proceedings Act 1947, the Crown had immunity in tort. Note also the position in Israel (discussed in ch 16) and the Netherlands (ch 19).Google Scholar
2 See Stapleton, J ‘Duty of care: peripheral parties and alternative opportunities for deterrence’ (1995) 111 LQR 301.Google Scholar
3 Rights Brought Home: The Human Rights Bill (Cm 3782).Google Scholar
4 See Stovin v Wise [1996] AC 923.Google Scholar
5 Op cit, at 80.Google Scholar
6 [2003] EWCA Civ 1151 [2003] 4 All ER 796.Google Scholar
7 [2003] 1 AC 32, at 66.Google Scholar