Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:50:13.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

National Minority Rights in Europe by Malloy Tove H [OUP, Oxford, 2005, 374 pp, ISBN 0-199274-43-6, £64.95 (h/bk)].

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2008

Jacqueline Mowbray
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
International & Comparative Law Quarterly , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 467 - 468
Copyright
Copyright © British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The democratic deficit argument is now almost too well known to require a reference, but for two general and authoritative works dealing with the issue see Scharpf, Fritz W, Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? (OUP, Oxford, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar) and Amaryllis, Verhoeven, The European Union in Search of a Democratic and Constitutional Theory (Kluwer, The Hague, 2002).Google Scholar The democratic deficit problem has also been acknowledged by the European institutions themselves: see, for example, the European Commission's White Paper on European Governance of 25 July 2001 (COM(2001) 428 final).Google Scholar

2 Acknowledged in the Commission's White Paper on European Governance, eg at p 7.Google Scholar

3 The French and Dutch rejections of the Constitution were admittedly events which took place after publication of the book, but the phenomenon of Euro-scepticism, which these events embody, is not a new one.

4 To cite but one example, see the review of these developments in Anaya, S James, Indigenous Peoples in International Law (2nd edn, OUP, Oxford, 2004).Google Scholar