Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:55:19.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Yes, Virginia, Aseptic Technique Is Very Important: Maximal Barrier Precautions During Insertion Reduce the Risk of Central Venous Catheter-Related Bacteremia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Dennis G. Maki*
Affiliation:
Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Medical School, the Infection Control Department and the Center for Trauma and Life Support, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
*
Department of Medicine, H4/574, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI 53792
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1994

References

1. Goldmann, DA, Maki, DG. Infection control in total parenteral nutrition/AMA 1973;223:13601364.Google Scholar
2. Allen, JR. The incidence of nosocomial infection in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition. In: Johnston, IDA, ed. Advances in Parenteral Nutrition. Lancaster, England: MTP Press; 1978:339377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Puntis, JW. Percutaneous insertion of central venous feeding catheters. Arch Dis Childhood 1986;61:11381140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Decker, MD, Edwards, KM. Central venous catheter infections. Pediatr Clin North Am 1988;35:579612.Google Scholar
5. Hampton, AA, Sherertz, RJ. Vascular-access infections in hospitalized patients. Surg Clin North Am 1988;68:5771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Food and Drug Administration. Precautions necessary with central venous catheters, FDA Drug Bull 1989;19:1516.Google Scholar
7. Perkins, CM, Dascomb, HE. Intravascular device-related infections Prob Crit Care 1990;4:2144.Google Scholar
8. Maki, DG. Infections due to infusion therapy. In Bennett, J, Brachman, PS, eds. Hospital Infections Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co; 1992:849898.Google Scholar
9. Bjornson, HS. Pathogenesis, prevention, and management of catheter-associated infections. New Horiz 1993;1:271278.Google ScholarPubMed
10. Allen, JR. ACTA Chair Scand 1981;507(suppl):405418.Google Scholar
11. Kaye, W. Catheter- and infusion-related sepsis: the nature of the problem and its prevention. Heart Lung 1982;11:221228.Google ScholarPubMed
12. Henderson, DK. Bacteremia due to percutaneous intravascular devices. In Mandell, GL, Douglass, RG Sr, Bennett, JE, eds. Principles and Practices of Infectious Diseases. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1985:16121620.Google Scholar
13. Williams, WW. Infection control during parenteral nutrition and therapy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1985;9:735746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Seneff, MG. Catheterization in a comprehensive view, part 1. J Intens Care 1986:2:163175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Murphy, LM, Lipman, PO. Central venous catheter care and parenteral nutrition: a review. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1987:190201.Google Scholar
16. Stenzel, JP, Green, TT, Fuhrman, BP, Carlson, PE, Marchessault RI? Percutaneous central venous catheterization in a pediatric intensive care unit: a survival analysis of complications. Crit Care Med 1989;17:984988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Corona, ML, Peters, SG, Narr, BJ, Thompson, RL. Infections related to central venous catheters. Mayo Clin Proc 1990;65:979986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Toltzis, P, Goldmann, DA. Ann Rev Merd 1990;41:169176.Google Scholar
19. Norwood, S, Ruby, A, Civetta, J, Cortex, V. Catheter-related infections and associated septicemia. Chest 1991;99:968975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Centers for Disease Control. Guideline for prevention of intravascular infections. Infect Control 1982;3:6172.Google Scholar
21. Nyström, B, Olesen-Larsen, S, Dankret, J, et al. Bacteraemia in surgical patients with intravenous devices: a European multicentre incidence study. J Hosp Infect 1983;4:338349.Google Scholar
22. Richet, H, Hubert, B, Nitemberg, G, et al. Prospective multicenter study of vascular catheter-related complications and risk factors for positive central-catheter cultures in intensive care unit patients, J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:25202525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Mermel, LA, McCormick, RD, Springman, SR, Maki, DG. The pathogenesis and epidemiology of catheter-related infection with pulmonary artery Swan-Ganz catheters. A prospective study using molecular subtyping. Am J Med 1991;38:197S105S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Raad, II, Hohn, DC, Gilbreath, J, et al. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:231238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Sanders, RA, Sheldon, GE Septic complications of total parenteral nutrition. A five-year experience. Am J Surg 1976;132:214220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Keohane, PP, Jones, BJM, Attrill, H, et al. Effect of catheter tunnelling and a nutrition nurse on catheter sepsis during parenteral nutrition. A controlled trial. Lancet 1983:13881390.Google Scholar
27. Bentley, DW, Lepper, MH. Septicemia related to indwelling venous catheter. JAMA 1968;206:17491752.Google Scholar
28. Freeman, JB, Lemire, A, MacLean, LD. Intravenous alimentation and septicemia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1972;135:708712.Google ScholarPubMed
29. Nehme, AE. Nutritional support of the hospitalized patient: the team concept. JAMA 1980;243:19061908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Faubion, WC, Wesley, JR, Khalidi, N, Silva, J. Total parenteral nutrition catheter sepsis: impact of the team approach. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1986;10:642645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Nelson, DB, Kien, CL, Mohr, B, Frank, S, Davis, SD. Dressing changes by specialized personnel reduce infection rates in patients receiving central venous parenteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1986;10:220222.Google Scholar
32. Tomford, IW, Hershey, CO, McLaren, CE, Porter, DK, Cohen, DI. Intravenous therapy team and peripheral venous catheter-associated complications. A prospective controlled study. Arch Intern Med 1984;144:11911194.Google Scholar
33. Soifer, NE, Edlin, BR, Weinstein, RA, MRHIV Study Group. A randomized IV team trial. In: Program and Abstracts of the 29tk Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Mcrobiology; 1989:1076.Google Scholar
34. Hoffmann, KK, Weber, DJ, Samsa, GP, Rutala, WA. Transparent polyurethane film as an intravenous catheter dressing. A metaanalysis of infection rates. JAMA 1992;267:20722076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35. Powell, C, Regan, C, Fabri, PJ, Ruberg, RL. Evaluation of op-site catheter dressings for parenteral nutrition: a prospective, randomized study. JPENJ Parenter Enteral Nutr 1982;6:4346.Google Scholar
36. Palidar, PJ, Simonowitz, DA, Oreskovich, MR, et al. Use of opsite as an occlusive dressing for total parenteral nutrition catheters. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1982;6:150151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Nehme, AE, Trigger, JA. Catheter dressings in central parenteral nutrition: a prospective randomized comparative study. Nutritional Support Services 1984;4:4243.Google Scholar
38. Maki, DG, Will, L. Colonization and infection associated with transparent dressings for central venous, arterial, and Hickman catheters: a comparative trial. In: Program and Abstracts of the 24th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1984:991.Google Scholar
39. Powell, CR, Traetow, MJ, Fabri, PJ, Kudsk, KA, Ruberg, RL. Opsite dressing study: a prospective randomized study evaluating povidone iodine ointment and extension set changes with 7-day opsite dressings applied to total parenteral nutrition subclavian sites. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1985;9:443446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40. Young, GP, Alexeyeff, M, Russell, DM, Thomas, RIS. Catheter sepsis during parenteral nutrition: the safety of long-term opsite dressings. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1988;12:365370.Google Scholar
41. Conly, JM, Grieves, K, Peters, B. A prospective, randomized study comparing transparent and dry gauze dressings for central venous catheters. J Infect Dis 1989;159:310319.Google Scholar
42. Andersen, PT, Herlevsen, P, Schaumburg, H. A comparative study of ‘op-site’ and ‘Nobecutan gauze’ dressings for central venous line care. J Hosp Infect 1986;7:161168.Google Scholar
43. McCredie, KB, Lawson, M, Marts, K, Stem, J. A comparative evaluation of transparent dressings and gauze dressings for central venous catheters. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1984;8:96. Abstract.Google Scholar
44. Ricard, R Martin, R, Marcoux, JA. Protection of indwelling vascular catheters: Incidence of bacterial contamination and catheter-related sepsis. Crit Care Med 1985;13:541543.Google Scholar
45. Maki, DG, Stolz, SM, Wheeler, SJ, Mermel, LA. A prospective, randomized, three-way clinical comparison of novel highly permeable polyurethane dressing with 442 Swan-Ganz catheters. In: Program and Abstracts of the 32nd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1992:825.Google Scholar
46. Burke, JF, Quinby, WC, Bondoc, CC, Sheehy, EM, Moreno, HC. The contribution of a bacterially isolated environment to the prevention of infection in seriously burned patients. Ann Surg 1977;186:377387.Google Scholar
47. Demling, RH, Perea, A, Maly, J, Moylan, JA, Jarrett, F, Balish, E. The use of a laminar airflow isolation system for the treatment of major bums. Am J Surg 1978;136:375378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48. Shirani, KZ, McManus, AT, Vaughan, GM, McManus, WF, Pruitt, BA Jr, Mason, AD Jr. Effects of environment on infection in burn patients. Arch Surg 1986;121:3136.Google Scholar
49. Weinstein, RA, Kabins, SA. Strategies for prevention and control of multiple drug-resistant nosocomial infection. Am J Med 1989;70:449454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50. Klein, BS, Perloff, WH, Maki, DG. Reduction of nosocomial infection during pediatric intensive care by protective isolation. N Engl J Med 1989;320:17141721.Google Scholar
51. Maki, DG, Ringer, M, Alvarado, CJ. Prospective randomized trial of povidone-iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine for prevention of infection associated with central venous and arterial catheters. Lancet 1991;338:339343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52. Levin, A, Mason, AJ, Jindal, KK, Fong, IW, Goldstein, MB. Prevention of hemodialysis subclavian vein catheter infections with topical povidone-iodine. Kidney Int 1991;40:934938.Google Scholar
53. Maki, DG, Cobb, I, Garman, JK, Shapiro, J, Ringer, M, Helgerson, HH. An attachable silver-impregnated cuff for prevention of infection with central venous catheters. A prospective randomized multi-center trial. Am J Med 1988;85:307314.Google Scholar
54. Flowers, RH III, Schwenzer, KJ, Kopel, RJ, Fisch, MJ, Tucker, SI, Farr, BM. Efficacy of an attachable subcutaneous cuff for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infection. JAMA 1989;261:878883.Google Scholar
55. Rafkin, HS, Hoyt, JW, Crippen, DW. Prevention of certified venous catheter-related infection with a silver-impregnated cuff. Chest 1990;98:117S. Abstract.Google Scholar
56. Kamal, GD, Pfaller, MA, Rempe, LE, Jebson, PJR. Reduced intravascular infection by antibiotic bonding. JAMA 1991;265:23642368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57. Maki, DG, Stolz, SM, Wheeler, SJ, Mermel, LA. Clinical trial of a novel antiseptic central venous catheter (abstract). In: Program and Abstracts of the 31st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1991:461.Google Scholar