Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:10:30.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wound Infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

William Newsom*
Affiliation:
Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridge, England
*
Sims Woodhead Memorial Laboratory, Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridge, CB3 8RE, England

Extract

Any consideration of infection following clean surgery, particularly cardiothoracic must include both exogenous and endogenous sources. The MRC Study on Hip Surgery presents a particular challenge. Although uncontrolled antibiotic prophylaxis reduced the infection rate almost as well as a laminar flow operating theater, further analysis of the data correlated the incidence of infection with the theater air counts and more significantly considered the sources of Staphylococcus aureus infections. Data on swabs from patient and theater staff at the time of surgery were available for 14 of the 28 patients who subsequently developed deep infections with S. aureus. Overall 25% of patients and 33% of staff were carriers. Bacteriophage typing revealed that 2 patients, 2 surgeons and 7 theater staff carried the infecting type at the time of the surgery. In two instances there was no correlation and in the last a member of the surgical staff on leave at the time carried the relevant strain. This at least provides a clue that exogenous infection can be important, and justifies attempts to clean the environment as well as the patient.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Lidwell, OM, Lowbury, EJL, Whyte, W, et al: Effect of ultraclean air in operating rooms on deep sepsis in the joint after hip or knee replacement. Br MedJ 1982; 285:1014.Google Scholar
2.Lidwell, OM, Lowbury, EJL, Whyte, W, et al: Airborne contamination and infection in hip replacements. J Hosp infect 1983; 4:111131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Lidwell, OM, Lowbury, EJL, Whyte, W, et al: Bacteria isolated from deep joint sepsis after operation for total hip or knee replacement and the sources of infection with Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect 1983; 4:1929.Google Scholar
4.Wells, FC, Newsom, SWB, Rowland, C: Wound infection in cardiothoracic surgery. Lancet 1983; i: 12091210.Google Scholar
5.Bor, DH, Rose, RM, Modlin, JF, et al: Mediastinitis after cardiovascular surgery. Rev Infect Du 1983; 5:885897.Google Scholar
6.Freeman, R, Gould, FK: Fever and gram negative infection after open-heart surgery is prevented by anti-endotoxin. Thorax 1985, to be published.Google Scholar
7.Herr, R, Starr, A, McCord, CW, et al: Special problems following valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1965; 1:403410.Google Scholar
8.Penketh, ARL, Wansbrough-Jones, MH, Wright, E, et al: Antibiotic prophylaxis for coronary bypass graft surgery. Lancet 1985; i: 1500.Google Scholar
9.Culliford, AT, Cunningham, JN, Zeff, RH, et al: Costochondral infections following open-heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1976; 72:714725.Google Scholar
10.Archer, GL, Tenenbaum, MJ: Antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1980; 17:269272.Google Scholar
11.Archer, GL, Armstrong, BC: Alteration of staphylococcal flora in cardiac surgery patients receiving antibiotic prophylaxis. J Infect Dis 1983; 147:642649.Google Scholar
12.Matthews, J, Slater, K, Newsom, SWB: The effect of surgical gowns made with barrier cloth on bacterial dispersal. J Hyg 1985; 95:123130.Google Scholar
13.Platt, J, Bucknall, RA: An experimental evaluation of antiseptic wound irrigation. J Hosp Infect 1984; 8:181188.Google Scholar