Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:20:44.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variability of surgical prophylaxis in penicillin-allergic children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2018

David F. Butler*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri
Brian R. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri
Sarah Suppes
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri
Tracy Sandritter
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri
Jason G. Newland
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
Lory Harte
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri
Jennifer L. Goldman*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri
*
Authors for correspondence: David F. Butler, MD, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children’s Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, FA.2.112, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle WA 98105. E-mail: [email protected]. Also, Jennifer Goldman MD, MS Divisions of Pediatric Infectious Diseases & Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Mercy Hospital, 2401 Gillham Rd, Kansas City, MO 64108. E-mail: [email protected]
Authors for correspondence: David F. Butler, MD, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children’s Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, FA.2.112, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle WA 98105. E-mail: [email protected]. Also, Jennifer Goldman MD, MS Divisions of Pediatric Infectious Diseases & Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Mercy Hospital, 2401 Gillham Rd, Kansas City, MO 64108. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

We retrospectively evaluated the effect of penicillin adverse drug reaction (ADR) labeling on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Cefazolin was administered in 86% of penicillin ADR-negative (−) and 28% penicillin ADR-positive (+) cases. Broad-spectrum antibiotic use was more common in ADR(+) cases and was more commonly associated with perioperative adverse drug events.

Type
Concise Communication
Copyright
© 2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Present affiliation: Division of Pediatric Critical Care, University of Washington, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington.

Cite this article: Butler DF et al. (2018). Variability of surgical prophylaxis in penicillin-allergic children. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2018, 39, 1480–1483. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.244

References

1. Kerr, JR. Penicillin allergy: a study of incidence as reported by patients. Brit J Clin Pract 1994;48:57.Google Scholar
2. Attia, MS, Stringer, MD, McClean, P, Prasad, KR. The reduced left lateral segment in pediatric liver transplantation: an alternative to the monosegment graft. Pediatr Transplant 2008;12:696700.Google Scholar
3. MacLaughlin, EJ, Saseen, JJ, Malone, DC. Costs of beta-lactam allergies: selection and costs of antibiotics for patients with a reported beta-lactam allergy. Arch Fam Med 2000;9:722726.Google Scholar
4. Alsultan, A, Peloquin, CA. Therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of tuberculosis: an update. Drugs 2014;74:839854.Google Scholar
5. Bratzler, DW, Dellinger, EP, Olsen, KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2013;70:195283.Google Scholar
6. Sandora, TJ, Fung, M, Melvin, P, Graham, DA, Rangel, SJ. National variability and appropriateness of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in US children’s hospitals. JAMA Pediatr 2016;170:570576.Google Scholar
7. National Expert Panel of the ICD-9-CM Adverse Event Classification, Utah/Missouri Patient Safety Consortium. The ICD-9-CM adverse event classification. Utah Department of Health website. health.utah.gov/psi/icd9.htm. Accessed June 25, 2018.Google Scholar
8. Goldman, JL, Sandritter, TL, Sullins, A, Leeder, JS, Lowry, JA. Pediatric pharmacovigilance: enhancing adverse drug reaction reporting in a tertiary care children’s hospital. Ther Innov Regulat Sci 2013;47:566571.Google Scholar
9. Beltran, RJ, Kako, H, Chovanec, T, Ramesh, A, Bissonnette, B, Tobias, JD. Penicillin allergy and surgical prophylaxis: cephalosporin cross-reactivity risk in a pediatric tertiary care center. J Pediatr Surg 2015;50:856859.Google Scholar
10. Albertson, TE, Chenoweth, JA, Colby, DK, Sutter, ME. The changing drug culture: use and misuse of appearance- and performance-enhancing drugs. FP Essent 2016;441:3043.Google Scholar
11. Hougland, P, Nebeker, J, Pickard, S, et al. Using ICD-9-CM codes in hospital claims data to detect adverse events in patient safety surveillance. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, et al., editors. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches, Vol. 1: Assessment. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008.Google Scholar
12. Hougland, P, Xu, W, Pickard, S, Masheter, C, Williams, SD. Performance of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes as an adverse drug event surveillance system. Med Care 2006;44:629636.Google Scholar