Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:25:27.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using Surveillance Data to Direct Infection Control Efforts to Reduce Surgical-Site Infections Following Clean Abdominal Operations in Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Keita Morikane ,
Midori Nishioka ,
Hisami Tanimura ,
Hiroe Noguchi ,
Toshiro Konishi  and
Hiroyoshi Kobayashi
Keita Morikane*
Affiliation:
Department of Colorectal Surgery, University of Tokyo School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Midori Nishioka
Affiliation:
National College of Nursing, Tokyo, Japan
Hisami Tanimura
Affiliation:
Kanto Medical Center NTT EC, Tokyo, Japan
Hiroe Noguchi
Affiliation:
Kanto Medical Center NTT EC, Tokyo, Japan
Toshiro Konishi
Affiliation:
Kanto Medical Center NTT EC, Tokyo, Japan
Hiroyoshi Kobayashi
Affiliation:
Kanto Medical Center NTT EC, Tokyo, Japan
*
Department of Colorectal Surgery, University of Tokyo School of Medicine, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We initiated surveillance for surgical-site infections (SSIs) in a Japanese hospital using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions and the approach of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System. Patients were observed following clean and clean-contaminated abdominal operations. SSI rates were higher than those of the NNIS System, but there was a trend toward decreased SSI rates in the latter half of the study period.

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 23 , Issue 7 , July 2002 , pp. 404 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Mangram, AJ, Pearson, ML, Silver, LC, Jarvis, WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999; 20:247–278.Google Scholar
2.Hospital Infections Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system report, data summary from January 1990-May 1999, issued June 1999. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:520–532.Google Scholar
3.Emori, TG, Gaynes, RP. An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev 1993;16:428–442.Google Scholar
4.Haley, RW, Culver, DH, White, JW, et al. The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121:182–205.Google Scholar
5.Cruse, PJE, Foord, R. The epidemiology of wound infection: a 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin N Am 1980;60:27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Condon, RE, Schulte, WJ, Malangoni, MA, Anderson-Teschendorf, MJ. Effectiveness of a surgical wound surveillance program. Arch Surg 1983;118:303–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Holtz, TH, Wenzel, RP. Postdischarge surveillance for nosocomial wound infection: a brief review and commentary. Am J Infect Control 1992;20: 206–213.Google Scholar
8.Morikane, K, Konishi, T, Nishioka, M, et al. Initiation of nationwide nosocomial infection surveillance in Japan. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:156. Abstract.Google Scholar