Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:53:23.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Use of Best Practice Alerts with the Development of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Navigator to Promote Antibiotic De-escalation in the Electronic Medical Record

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Lucas Schulz ,
Kurt Osterby  and
Barry Fox
Lucas Schulz*
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin
Kurt Osterby
Affiliation:
Center for Clinical Knowledge Management, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin
Barry Fox
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
*
Critical Care and Infectious Diseases Clinical Pharmacist, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, 600 Highland Avenue, F6/133–1530, Madison, WI 53792 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective.

Develop a clinical decision support tool comprised of an electronic medical record alert and antimicrobial stewardship navigator to facilitate antimicrobial stewardship.

Design.

We analyzed alerts targeting antimicrobial de-escalation to assess the effectiveness of the navigator as a stewardship tool. The alert provides antimicrobial recommendations, then directs providers to the navigator, which includes order management, relevant patient information, evidence-based clinical information, and bidirectional communication capability.

Setting.

Academic, tertiary care medical center with an electronic medical record.

Intervention.

Alerts containing stewardship recommendations and immediate access to the navigator were created.

Results.

Antibiotic use and response data were collected 1 day before stewardship recommendation via the best practice alert (BPA) tool and 1 day after the BPA tool response. A total of 1,285 stewardship BPAs were created. Two hundred and forty-four (18.9%) of the BPAs were created and acted upon within 72 hours for the purpose of de-escalation: 169 (69%) were accepted, 30 (12%) were accepted with modification, and 45 (18%) were rejected. Statistically significant decreases in total antibiotic use as well as in use of broad-spectrum (anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and anti-pseudomonal) agents occurred when accepted recommendations were compared with rejected recommendations.

Conclusions.

We describe the successful development of a clinical decision support tool to perform prospective audit and feedback comprised of an alert and navigator system featuring evidence-based recommendations and clinical and educational information. We demonstrate that this tool improves antibiotic use through our example of de-escalation.

Clinical Trials Identifier.

This project was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01573195).

Type
Original Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 34 , Issue 12 , December 2013 , pp. 1259 - 1265
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Dellit, TH, Owens, RC, McGowan, JE Jr, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44(2):159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Johannsson, B, Beekmann, SE, Srinivasan, A, Hersh, AL, Laxmi-narayan, R, Polgreen, PM. Improving antimicrobial stewardship: the evolution of programmatic strategies and barriers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32(4):367–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Evans, RS, Pestotnik, SL, Classen, DC, et al. A computer-assisted management program for antibiotics and other antiinfective agents. New Engl J Med 1998;338(4):232–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Pestotnik, SL, Classen, DC, Evans, RS, Burke, JP. Implementing antibiotic practice guidelines through computer-assisted decision support: clinical- and financial outcomes. Ann Intern Med 1996;124(10):884–890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Kaushal, R, Shojania, KG, Bates, DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2003;163(12):1409–1416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Niederman, MS. De-escalation therapy in ventilator-associated pneumonia. Curr Opin Crit Care 2006;12(5):452–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Masterton, RG. Antibiotic de-escalation. Crit Care Clin 2011;27(1):149–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Joung, MK, Lee, JA, Moon, SY, et al. Impact of de-escalation therapy on clinical outcomes for intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia. Crit Care 2011;15(2):R79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Gomes Silva, BN, Andriolo, RB, Atallah, AN, Salomao, R. De-escalation of antimicrobial treatment for adults with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock. Cochrane Datahase Syst Rev 2010(12):CD007934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Heenen, S, Jacobs, F, Vincent, JL. Antibiotic strategies in severe nosocomial sepsis: why do we not de-escalate more often? Crit Care Med 2012;40(5):1404–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Singh, N, Rogers, P, Atwood, CW, Wagener, MM, Yu, VL. Short-course empiric antibiotic therapy for patients with pulmonary infiltrates in the intensive care unit: a proposed solution for indiscriminate antibiotic prescription. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:505–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Leone, M, Garcin, F, Bouvenot, J, et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia: breaking the vicious circle of antibiotic overuse. Crit Care Med 2007;35(2):379–385; quiz 386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Romano, MJ, Stafford, RS. Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. Arch Intern Med 2011;171(10):897–903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Hillestad, R, Bigelow, J, Bower, A, et al. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24(5):1103–1117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Kellermann, AL, Jones, SS. What it will take to achieve the as-yet-unfulfilled promises of health information technology. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32(1):63–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Kullar, R, Goff, D, Schulz, L, Fox, B, Rose, W. The EPIC challenge of optimizing antimicrobial stewardship: the role of electronic medical records and technology. Clin Infect Dis 2013;57(7):1005–1013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed