Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:49:07.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Universal Precautions: Still Missing the Point on Needlesticks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Janine Jagger  and
Richard D. Pearson
Janine Jagger*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
Richard D. Pearson
Affiliation:
Internal Medicine and Pathology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
*
Box 180 Medical Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , April 1991 , pp. 211 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1991

References

1. Needlestick transmission of HTLV-III from a patient infected in Africa. Lancet. 1984;2:1376–1377.Google Scholar
2. Stricof, RL, Morse, DL. HTLV-III/LAV seroconversion following a deep intramuscular needlestick injury. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1115.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Oksenhendler, E, Harzic, M, Le Roux, J-M, Rabian, C, Clauvel, JI? HIV infection with seroconversion after a superficial needlestick injury to the finger. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:582.Google Scholar
4. Marcus, R, CDC Cooperative Needlestick Surveillance Group. Surveillance of healthcare workers exposed to blood from patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:1118–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Williams, WW. Guideline for infection control in hospital personnel. Infect Control 1983;4:(suppl):326–349.Google ScholarPubMed
6. McCormick, RD, Maki, DG. Epidemiology of needlestick injuries in hospital personnel. Am J Med. 1981;70:928–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Neuberger, JS, Harris, J, Kudin, WD, Bichone, A, Chin, TD. Incidence of needlestick injuries in hospital personnel: implications for prevention. Am J Infect Control. 1984;12:171–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Jackson, MM, Dechairo, DC, Gardner, DE. Perceptions and beliefs of nursing and medical personnel about needle-handling practices and needlestick injuries. Am J Infect Control 1986;14:1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Jagger, J, Hunt, EH, Brand-Elnaggar, J, Pearson, RD. Rates of needlestick injury caused by various devices in a university hospital. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:284–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Jagger, J, Hunt, EH, Pearson, RD. Recapping used needles: is it worse than the alternative? J Infect Dis. 1990;162:784–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Ribner, BS, Landry, MN, Gholson, GL, Linden, LA. Impact of a rigid, puncture resistant container system upon needlestick injuries. Infect Control. 1987;863–866.Google ScholarPubMed
12. Edmond, M, Khakoo, R, McTaggart, B, Solomon, R. Effect of bedside needle disposal units on needle recapping frequency and needlestick injury. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1988;9:114–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Becker, MH, Janz, NK, Band, J, Bartley, J, Snyder, MB, Gaynes, RP. Noncompliance with Universal Precautions policy: why do physicians and nurses recap needles? Am J Infect Control. 1990;18:232–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Krasinski, K, LaCouture, R, Holzman, RS. Effect of changing needle disposal systems on needle puncture injuries. Infect Control. 1987;8:59–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Need for progressive disciplinary action debated as a means to prevent needlesticks. Occupational Safety and Health Reporter. 1991;20:1187–1188.Google Scholar
16. Krumholtz, HM, Cummings, S, York, M. Blood culture phlebotomy: switching needles does not prevent contamination. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:290–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Hamilton, RA, Plis, J, Clay, C, Sylvan, L. Heparin sodium versus 0.9% sodium chloride injection for maintaining patency of indwelling intermittent infusion devices. Clin Pharm. 1988;7:439–443.Google ScholarPubMed