Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:48:38.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding changes in the standardized antimicrobial administration ratio for total antimicrobial use after implementation of prospective audit and feedback

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2018

Meghan E. Griebel ,
Brett Heintz ,
Bruce Alexander ,
Jason Egge ,
Michihiko Goto  and
Daniel J. Livorsi Open the ORCID record for Daniel J. Livorsi [Opens in a new window]
Meghan E. Griebel
Affiliation:
Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa
Brett Heintz
Affiliation:
Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa
Bruce Alexander
Affiliation:
Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa
Jason Egge
Affiliation:
Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa
Michihiko Goto
Affiliation:
Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
Daniel J. Livorsi*
Affiliation:
Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
*
Author for correspondence: Daniel Livorsi, MD, MSc, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa VA Health Care System, 601 Highway 6 West, Iowa City, IA 52246. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this single-center study, the standardized antimicrobial administration ratio (SAAR) for total antimicrobial use decreased in response to a stewardship intervention. Antimicrobial prescribing and clinical outcomes were stable or improved during the period of lower SAARs. Our findings suggest that SAAR values of ~0.8 can be safely achieved.

Type
Concise Communication
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 39 , Issue 12 , December 2018 , pp. 1476 - 1479
Copyright
© 2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Cite this article: Griebel M, et al. (2018). Understanding changes in the standardized antimicrobial administration ratio for total antimicrobial use after implementation of prospective audit and feedback. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2018, 39, 1476–1479. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.248

References

1. Core elements of hospital antibiotic stewardship programs. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/getsmart/healthcare/pdfs/core-elements.pdf. Published 2014. Accessed June 26, 2018.Google Scholar
2. Antimicrobial use and resistance module. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/11pscaurcurrent.pdf. Published 2015. Accessed February 9, 2016.Google Scholar
3. van Santen, KL, Edwards, JR, Webb, AK, et al. The standardized antimicrobial administration ratio: a new metric for measuring and comparing antibiotic use. Clin Infect Dis 2018;67:179–185.Google Scholar
4. Srinivasan, A. Antimicrobial stewardship: an update on national activities. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Spring Conference, March 29–31, 2017; St Louis, MO.Google Scholar
5. Ashley, ED, Fishman, NO. Is SAAR ready for primetime? ID Week Conference, October 5, 2017; San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
6. Livorsi, DJ, O’Leary, E, Pierce, T, et al. A novel metric to monitor the influence of antimicrobial stewardship activities. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:721–723.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Griebel et al. supplementary material

Griebel et al. supplementary material 1

Download Griebel et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 20.9 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Griebel et al. supplementary material

Griebel et al. supplementary material 2

Download Griebel et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 352.4 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Griebel et al. supplementary material

Griebel et al. supplementary material 3

Download Griebel et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 380 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Griebel et al. supplementary material

Griebel et al. supplementary material 4

Download Griebel et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 24.8 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Griebel et al. supplementary material

Griebel et al. supplementary material 5

Download Griebel et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 27 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Griebel et al. supplementary material

Griebel et al. supplementary material 6

Download Griebel et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 7.8 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Griebel et al. supplementary material

Griebel et al. supplementary material 7

Download Griebel et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 201.3 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Griebel et al. supplementary material

Griebel et al. supplementary material 8

Download Griebel et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 190.9 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Griebel et al. supplementary material

Griebel et al. supplementary material 9

Download Griebel et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 211 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Griebel et al. supplementary material

Griebel et al. supplementary material 10

Download Griebel et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 178.2 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Griebel et al. supplementary material

Griebel et al. supplementary material 11

Download Griebel et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 369.5 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Griebel et al. supplementary material

Griebel et al. supplementary material 12

Download Griebel et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 22.2 KB