Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:37:29.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tuberculin Positivity and Patient Contact in Healthcare Workers in the Urban United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Susan L. Rattner ,
Julie A. Fleischer  and
Bruce L. Davidson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We performed tuberculin and anergy testing in 91 healthy volunteer employees from the patient transport and housekeeping units at an urban tertiary-care hospital, stratifying results by the risk factor of patient contact. Tuberculin positivity was highly prevalent in this group; patient contact was not a predictor of tuberculosis infection risk, and anergy was rare.

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 17 , Issue 6 , June 1996 , pp. 369 - 371
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bloom, BR, Murray, CJL. Tuberculosis: commentary on a re-emergent killer. Science 1992;257:1055–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. American Thoracic Society. Control of tuberculosis in the United States. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992;146:1623–1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Centers for Disease Control. PPD-tuberculin anergy and HIV infection. MMWR 1991;40(RR-5):27–33.Google Scholar
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in healthcare facilities. MMWR 1994;43(RR):13.Google Scholar
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Draft guidelines for preventing the transmission of tuberculosis in healthcare facilities. 2nd ed. Federal Register October 12, 1993;58(195):52810–52854.Google Scholar
6. Reider, HL, Cauthen, GM, Kelly, GD, et al. Tuberculosis in the United States. JAMA 1989;262:385–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Johnson, JL, Nyole, S, Shepardson, L, Magewa, R, Ellner, JJ. Simultaneous comparison of two commercial tuberculin skin test reagents in an area with a high prevalence of tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 1995;171:1066–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Bailey, TC, Fraser, VJ, Spitzvogel, EL, Dunegan, WC. Risk factors for a positive tuberculin skin test among employees of an urban midwestern teaching hospital. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:580–585.Google Scholar
9. Graham, NMH, Nelson, KE, Bonds, M, et al. Prevalence of tuberculin positivity and skin anergy in HIV-1-seropositive and - seronegative intravenous drug users. JAMA 1992;267:369–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Delafuente, JC, Eisenberg, JD, Hoelzer, DR, Slavin, RG. Tetanus toxoid as an antigen for delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity. JAMA 1983;249:3209–3211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed