Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:47:10.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trends in the Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Associated With Discontinuation of an Isolation Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Barkat A. Fazal ,
Edward E. Telzak ,
Steve Blum ,
Glenn S. Turett ,
Frances E. Petersen-Fitzpatrick  and
Victor Lorian
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The number of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) before and after discontinuing placement of patients into private rooms was determined. The mean monthly number of patients with MRSA decreased from 34 to 22, and the proportion of S aureus isolates that were MRSA decreased from 34% to 20%. We found no evidence that failure to isolate patients with MRSA resulted in an increased prevalence of MRSA.

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 17 , Issue 6 , June 1996 , pp. 372 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Jevons, MP. Celbenin-resistant staphylococci. Br Med J 1961;1:124–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Panlilio, AL, Culver, DH, Gaynes, RP, et al. Methicillin-resistant in US hospitals, 1975-1991. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:582–586.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Boyce, JM, Causey, WA. Increasing occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the United States. Infect Control 1982;3:377–383.Google Scholar
4. Peacock, JE Jr Marsik, FJ, Wenzel, RP. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: introduction and spread within a hospital. Ann Intern Med 1980;93:526–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Ayliffe, GAJ, Duckworth, GJ, Brumfitt, W, et al. Guidelines for the control of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Report of a combined working party of the Hospital Infection Society and British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. J Hosp Infect 1986;7:193–201.Google Scholar
6. Fazal, BA, Telzak, EE, Blum, S, et al. Impact of a coordinated tuberculosis team in an inner-city hospital in New York City. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995;16:340–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. McManus, AT, Mason, AD Jr McManus, WF, Pruitt, BA Jr. What's in a name? Is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus just another S aureus when treated with vancomycin? Arch Surg 1989;124:1456–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Boyce, JM. Should we vigorously try to contain and control methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:46–54.Google Scholar
9. Ribner, BS, Landry, MN, Gholson, GL. Strict versus modified isolation for prevention of nosocomial transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Infect Control 1986;7:317–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Goetz, AM, Muder, RR. The problem of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a critical appraise of the efficacy of infection control procedures with a suggested approach for infection control programs. Am J Infect Control 1992;20:80–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Linnemann, CC, Moore, P, Staneck, JL, Pfaller, MA. Reemergence of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a general hospital associated with changing staphylococcal strains. Am J Med 1991;91(suppl 3B):238S–244S.Google Scholar