Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:18:50.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trends in central-line-associated bloodstream infections and catheter-associated urinary tract infections in a large acute-care hospital system in New York City, 2016-2019

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2020

Monica A. Kaminski ,
Briana Episcopia ,
Saquib Malik ,
Mary Fornek ,
David Landman ,
Geralda Xavier  and
John Quale Open the ORCID record for John Quale [Opens in a new window]
Monica A. Kaminski
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York
Briana Episcopia
Affiliation:
Department of Quality, Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York
Saquib Malik
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York
Mary Fornek
Affiliation:
Department of Infection Control and Prevention, NYC Health + Hospitals Central Office, Medical Professional Affairs, New York, New York
David Landman
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York
Geralda Xavier
Affiliation:
Department of Quality, Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York
John Quale*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York
*
Author for correspondence: John Quale, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Central-line bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) negatively impact clinical outcomes and hospital reimbursement. In this report, 4 year trends involving 11 hospitals in New York City were examined.

Methods:

Data from the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) were extracted for 11 acute-care hospitals belonging to the NYC Health + Hospital system from 2016 through 2019. Trends in device infections per 1,000 patient days, device utilization ratios, and standardized infection ratios (SIRs) were examined for the 11 hospitals and for the entire system.

Results:

Over the 4-year period, there were progressive declines in central-line days, infections per 1,000 central-line days, and device utilization ratios for the system. The average annual SIRs for the system also declined: 1.40 in 2016, 1.09 in 2017, 1.04 in 2018, and 0.82 in 2019. Case-mix indices correlated with SIRs for CLABSIs. Level 1 trauma centers had higher SIRs and a disproportionately greater number of CLABSIs in patients located in NHSN-defined surgical intensive care units. Similar trends with CAUTIs were noted, with progressive declines in catheter days, infections per 1,000 patient days, device utilization ratios, and SIRs (1.42 in 2016, 0.93 in 2017, 1.18 in 2018, and 0.78 in 2019) over the 4-year period.

Conclusions:

Across an 11-hospital system, continuing efforts to reduce device utilization and infection rates resulted in declining SIRs for CLABSIs and CAUTIs. Hospitals with higher case-mix indices, and particularly level 1 trauma centers, had significantly higher central-line infection rates and SIRs.

Type
Original Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 42 , Issue 7 , July 2021 , pp. 842 - 846
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rello, J, Ochagavia, A, Roque, M, et al. Evaluation of outcome of intravenous catheter-related infections in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:1027–1030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siempos, II, Kopterides, P, Tsangaris, I, Dimopoulou, I, Armaganidis, AE. Impact of catheter-related bloodstream infections on the mortality of critically ill patients: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2009;37:2283–2289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chant, C, Smith, OM, Marshall, JC, Friedrich, JO. Relationship of catheter-associated urinary tract infection to mortality and length of stay in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Crit Care Med 2011;39:1167–1173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Estimating the additional hospital inpatient cost and mortality associated with select hospital-acquired conditions. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality website. https://www.ahrq.gov/hai/pfp/haccost2017-results.html. Published 2017. Accessed October 29 2020.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, JD, Batra, R, Wulff, J, Harrison, D. Reductions in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium difficile infection and intensive care unit-acquired bloodstream infection across the United Kingdom following implementation of a national infection control campaign. Clin Infect Dis 2020;70:2530–2540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsteller, JA, Sexton, J, Hsu, Y-J, et al. A multicenter, cluster-randomized controlled trial to reduce central-line–associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units. Crit Care Med 2012;40:2933–2939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pronovost, P, Needham, D, Berenholtz, S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2725–2732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, DC, Edwards, JR, Horan, TC, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus central line–associated bloodstream infections in US intensive care units, 1997–2007. J Am Med Assoc 2009;301:727–736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saint, S, Greene, MT, Krein, SL, et al. A program to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection in acute care. N Engl J Med 2016;374:2111–2119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magill, SS, O’Leary, E, Janelle, SJ, et al. Changes in prevalence of healthcare-associated infections in US hospitals. N Engl J Med 2018;379:1732–1744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, PK, Olmsted, RN, Hung, L, et al. A tiered approach for preventing central-line–associated bloodstream infection. Ann Intern Med 2019;171:S16–S22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meddings, J, Manojlovich, M, Fowler, KE, et al. A tiered approach for preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Ann Intern Med 2019;171:S30–S37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, PK, Greene, T, Jones, K, et al. Quantitative results of a national intervention to prevent central line–associated bloodstream infections: a pre–post observational study. Ann Intern Med 2019;171:S23–S29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meddings, J, Manojlovich, M, Ameling, JM, et al. Quantitative results of a national intervention to prevent hospital-acquired catheter-associated urinary tract infection: a pre–post observational study. Ann Intern Med 2019;171:S38–S44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umsheid, CA, Mitchell, MD, Doshi, JA, Agarwal, R, Williams, K, Brennan, PJ. Estimating the proportion of healthcare-associated infections that are reasonably preventable and the related mortality and costs. Infect Cont Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiong, Z, Chen, H. Interventions to reduce unnecessary central venous catheter use to prevent central-line–associated bloodstream infections in adults: a systematic review. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:1442–1448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoko, FE, Dick, A, Herzig, CTA, Pogorzelska-Maziar, M, Larson, EL, Stone, PW. Central-line–associated bloodstream infection reduction and bundle compliance in intensive care units: a national study. Infect Cont Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:805–810.Google Scholar
Pepin, CS, Thom, KA, Sorkin, JD, et al. Risk factors for central line–associated bloodstream infections: a focus on common comorbid conditions. Infect Cont Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:479–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritchevsky, SB, Braun, BI, Kusek, L, et al. The impact of hospital practice on central venous catheter–associated bloodstream infection rates at the patient and unit level: a multicenter study. Am J Med Qual 2008;23:24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar