No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Surveillance for Surgical-Site Infections: It's Getting Better All the Time
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2015
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Editorial
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2003
References
1.Sands, KE, Yokoe, DS, Hooper, DC, et al.Detection of postoperative surgical-site infections: comparison of health plan-based surveillance with hospital-based programs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:741–743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Monge Jodra, V, Robustillo Rodela, A, Martin Martinez, F, Lopez Fresneiia, N, the Quality Control Indicator Working Group. Standardized infection ratios for three general surgery procedures: a comparison between Spanish hospitals and U.S. centers participating in the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:744–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Sands, K, Vineyard, G, Livingston, J, Christiansen, C, Platt, R. Efficient identification of postdischarge surgical site infections: use of automated pharmacy dispensing information, administrative data, and medical record information. J Infect Dis 1999;179:434–441.Google Scholar
4.Platt, R, Yokoe, DS, Sands, KE. Automated methods for surveillance of surgical site infections. Emerging Infect Dis 2001;7:212–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Gustafson, TL. Practical risk-adjusted quality control charts for infection control. Am J Infect Control 2000;28:406–414.Google Scholar
6.Narong, MN, Thongpiyapoom, S, Thaikul, N, Jamulitrat, S, Kasatpibal, N. Surgical site infections in patients undergoing major operations in a university hospital: using standardized infection ratio as a benchmarking tool. Am J Infect Control 2003;31:274–279.Google Scholar
You have
Access