Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:08:35.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surveillance for Catheter-Associated Bloodstream Infection in Hematology Units: Quantifying the Characteristics of a Practical Case Definition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Leon J. Worth ,
James Black ,
John F. Seymour ,
Karin A. Thursky  and
Monica A. Slavin
Leon J. Worth*
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Centre for Clinical Research Excellence Infectious Diseases, Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
James Black
Affiliation:
Centre for Clinical Research Excellence Infectious Diseases, Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
John F. Seymour
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
Karin A. Thursky
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Centre for Clinical Research Excellence Infectious Diseases, Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Monica A. Slavin
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Centre for Clinical Research Excellence Infectious Diseases, Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
*
Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St. Andrew's Place, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 3002 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We evaluated 66 patients in a hematology unit, who used a total of 106 central venous catheters (CVCs), to identify CVC-associated bloodstream infections using standard and modified surveillance case definitions. Compared with the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance system criteria, a modified case definition used by treating physicians demonstrated 100.0% sensitivity and 94.3% specificity. This case definition provides a practical method for effectively excluding CVC-associated bloodstream infection.

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , April 2008 , pp. 358 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.McKibben, L, Horan, T, Tokars, JI, et al.Guidance on public reporting of healthcare-associated infections: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 2005;33:217–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Hosoglu, S, Akalin, S, Kidir, V, Suner, A, Kayabas, H, Geyik, MRProspective surveillance study for risk factors of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:131–134.Google Scholar
3.Coyle, VM, McMullan, R, Morris, TC, Rooney, PJ, Hedderwick, S. Catheter-related bloodstream infection in adult haematology patients: catheter removal practice and outcome. J Hosp Infect 2004;57:325–331.Google Scholar
4.Worth, LJ, Slavin, MA, Brown, GV, Black, J. Catheter-related bloodstream infections in hematology: time for standardized surveillance? Cancer 2007;109:1215–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Mermel, LA, Farr, BM, Sherertz, RJ, et al.Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:1249–1272.Google Scholar
6.Horain, TC, Emori, TG. Definitions of key terms used in the NNIS System. Am J Infect Control 1997;25:112–116.Google Scholar
7.Lee, TB, Baker, OG, Lee, JT, Scheckler, WE, Steele, L, Laxton, CE. Recommended practices for surveillance. Am J Infect Control 1998;26:277–288.Google Scholar
8.German, R, Lee, L, Horan, J, Milstein, R, Pertowski, C, Waller, M. Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2001;50(RR13):1–35.Google Scholar
9.Heipel, D, Ober, JF, Edmond, MB, Bearman, GM. Surgical site infection surveillance for neurosurgical procedures: a comparison of passive surveillance by surgeons to active surveillance by infection control professionals. Am J Infect Control 2007;35:200–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Horan, T, Gaynes, R. Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.Google Scholar