Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:33:44.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surgical-Site Complications Associated With a Morphine Nerve Paste Used for Postoperative Pain Control After Laminectomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Michael H. Kramer ,
Alicia J. Mangram ,
Michele L. Pearson  and
William R. Jarvis
Michael H. Kramer
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Alicia J. Mangram
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Michele L. Pearson*
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
William R. Jarvis
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Hospital Infections Program, Mailstop E-69, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, Atlanta, GA 30333
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To identify risk factors that might explain a sudden increase in the rate of surgical-site complications following laminectomy.

Design:

Retrospective cohort study.

Patients and Setting:

Patients who underwent laminectomy at a 120-bed hospital from August 1 through October 15, 1996 (the epidemic period). A case-patient was defined as a patient with postoperative surgical-site complications (surgical-site drainage, edema, or swelling) requiring surgical debridement.

Results:

Of the 148 patients who underwent a laminectomy during the epidemic period, 17 (11%) met our case definition. The rate of postoperative surgical debridement was 7.6-fold higher during the epidemic period than the preceding 19-month period (17/148 vs 15/995, P<.001). Development of surgical-site complications was associated with intraoperative receipt of morphine nerve paste (relative risk [RR], 11; P<.001), preoperative shaving by nurses rather than surgeons (RR, 6.6; P=.006), procedures done by a certain surgeon (RR, 3.1; P=.022), or receipt of iodine rather than povidone-iodine for preoperative skin antisepsis (RR, 5.1; P=.002). In multivariate analysis, only receipt of morphine nerve paste remained as a risk factor (RR, 18; P=.011). The paste was used to control postoperative pain and was applied directly to exposed dura and surrounding tissues. At the time of surgical debridement (median, 24 days postsurgery), the original surgical sites showed residual paste and a lack of healing. Ten of 16 cultures from surgical sites were positive; all but three grew skin commensals. Histological examination of surgical specimens showed a foreign-body reaction, but no marked acute inflammation.

Conclusions:

The intraoperative use of morphine nerve paste may delay wound healing and increase postoperative morbidity. When new products are introduced, standardized protocols should be developed for their use, and systematic surveillance should be done to monitor for potential adverse outcomes.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , March 1999 , pp. 183 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Milligan, KR, Macafee, AL, Fogarty, DJ, Wallace, RGH, Ramsey, P. Intraoperative bupivacaine diminishes pain after lumbar discectomy. A randomized double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993;75:769–771.Google Scholar
2. Gibbons, KJ, Barth, AP, Ahuja, A, Budny, JL, Hopkins, LN. Lumbar discectomy: use of an epidural sponge for postoperative pain control. Neurosurgery 1995;36:1131–1136.Google Scholar
3. Pinzur, MS, Garla, PGN, Pluth, T, Vrbos, L. Continuous postoperative infusion of a regional anesthetic after an amputation of the lower extremity. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78:1501–1505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Rainov, NG, Gutjahr, T, Burkert, W. Intra-operative epidural morphine, fentanyl, and droperidol for control of pain after spinal surgery. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blind trial. Acta Neurochir [Wien] 1996;138:33–39.Google Scholar
5. Badner, NH, Reid, D, Sullivan, P, Ganapathy, S, Crosby, ET, McKenna, J, et al. Continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine for the prevention of postoperative pain after major orthopedic surgery: a dose-finding study. Can JAnaesth 1996;43:17–22.Google Scholar
6. Sepehrnia, A, van Ouwerkerk, WJR. Analgesic effect of epidural morphine in lumbar disc surgery. Neurosurg Rev 1996;19:227–230.Google Scholar
7. Eriksson-Mjòberg, M, Svensson, JO, Almkvist, O, Ölund, A, Gustafsson, LL. Extradural morphine gives better pain relief than patient-controlled i.v. morphine after hysterectomy. Br JAnaesth 1997;78:10–16.Google Scholar
8. Needham, CW. Painless lumbar surgery: morphine nerve paste. Conn Med 1996;60:141–143.Google Scholar
9. Culver, DH, Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, Marrane, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. Am J Med 1991;91:152S–157S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Rhoden, DL, Hancock, GA, Miller, JM. Numerical approach to reference identification of Staphylococcus, Stomatococcus, and Micrococcus spp. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:490–493.Google Scholar
11. Kloos, WE, Bannerman, TL. Staphylococcus and Micrococcus . In: Murray, PR, Baron, EJ, Pfaller, MA, Tenover, FC, Yolken, RH, eds. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 6th ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 1995.Google Scholar
12. McGregor, DH, MacArthur, RI, Carter, T. Avitene granulomas of colonic serosa. Ann Clin Lab Sci 1986;16:296–302.Google Scholar
13. DeLustro, F, Condeil, RA, Nguyen, MA, McPherson, JM. A comparative study of the biologic and immunologic response to medical devices derived from dermal collagen. JBiomed Mater Res 1986;20:109–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Nakajima, M, Kamei, T, Tomimatu, K, Manabe, T. An intraperitoneal tumorous mass caused by granulomas of microfibrillar collagen hemo-stat (Avitene). Arch Pathol Lab Med 1995;119:1161–1163.Google Scholar
15. Kitamura, K, Yasuoka, R, Ohara, M, Shimotsuma, M, Hagiwara, A, Yamane, T, et al. How safe are the xenogenic hemostats? Report of a case of severe systemic allergic reaction. Surg Today 1995;25:433–435.Google Scholar