Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:15:23.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Suitability of the NNIS Index for Estimating Surgical-Site Infection Risk at a Small University Hospital in Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Maria Léa Campos ,
Zulmira Miotello Cipriano  and
Paulo Fontoura Freitas
Maria Léa Campos*
Affiliation:
Infection Control Committee, Hospital Universitário, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Zulmira Miotello Cipriano
Affiliation:
Infection Control Committee, Hospital Universitário, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Paulo Fontoura Freitas
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London University, United Kingdom
*
Rua Rui Barbosa, 135, 401, CEP 88025-300, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

To detect the occurrence of surgical-site infection (SSI) in our study sample, using the traditional variables of the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) index with a locally modified cut-off point for the “T time” defining length of surgical procedure; to compare the modified and the traditional NNIS index under the hypothesis that a cut-off point discriminating procedures of short and long duration, based upon the actual experience of the study sample, can adequately predict the risk of SSI.

Design:

A retrospective chart review of 9,322 patients undergoing surgical procedures in the period January 1993 to December 1998.

Setting:

A small university hospital (UH) in southern Brazil.

Results:

The composite index using the local sample procedure-duration cut-off point (UH-index) performed better than any of the individual components of the composite index (anesthesia risk index and surgical-wound class [SWC]). The UH-index also predicted adequately the risk of SSI when compared to the traditional NNIS index, particularly when stratifying by SWC.

Conclusions:

A modified NNIS index, using the sample cut-off point, can adequately predict the risk of SSI in a given population. Further studies are needed to compare and validate the NNIS index of risk for populations other than those of the NNIS-participating hospitals. Larger samples using different hospitals with similar characteristics are needed to investigate the risk of SSI associated with specific operations.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 22 , Issue 5 , May 2001 , pp. 268 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Emori, TG, Gaynes, RP. An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev 1993;6:428–442.Google Scholar
2.Haley, RW, Culver, DH, Morgan, WM, White, JW, Emori, TG, Hooton, TM. Identifying patients at high risk of surgical wound infection: a simple multivariate index of patient susceptibility and wound contamination. Am J Epidemiol 1985;121:206–215.Google Scholar
3.Consensus paper on the surveillance of surgical wound infections. The Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America, the Association for Practitioners in Infection Control, the Centers for Disease Control, the Surgical Infection Society. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:599–605.Google Scholar
4.Culver, DH, Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 1991;91(suppl 3B):152S–157S.Google Scholar
5.Roy, MC, Perl, TM. Basics of surgical site infection surveillance. In: Herwaldt, LA, ed. A Practical Handbook for Hospital Epidemiologists. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc; 1998:99–114.Google Scholar
6.Starling, CEF, Couto, BRGM, Pinheiro, SMC. Applying the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Nosocomial Surveillance system methods in Brazilian Hospitals. Am J Infect Control 1997;25:303–311.Google Scholar
7.Velasco, E, Thuler, LCS, de Souza Martins, CA, de Castro Dias, LM, Gonçalves, VM. Risk index for prediction of surgical site infection after oncology operations. Am J Infect Control 1998;26:217–223.Google Scholar
8.Ministry of Health, Brazil. Vigilância Epidemiológica por componentes NNISS (Epidemiological Surveillance by NNISS components). Trad. Solange de Lima Torres, Valéria Rumjanek e Fabiola de Aguiar Nunes. Brasília; 1994.Google Scholar
9.Starling, CEF, Pinto, CAG, Couto, BRMG, Pinheiro, SMC. Sistema de vigilância epidemiológica de infecções hospitalares por componentes. Metodologia NNISS aplicada a hospitais brasileiros. 2 ed, Belo Horizonte: [s.e]; 1992.Google Scholar
10.Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:606–608.Google Scholar
11.American Society of Anesthesiologists. New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 1963;24:111.Google Scholar
12.Owens, WD, Felts, JA, Spitznagel, EL JrASA physical status classification: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 1978;49:239–243.Google Scholar
13.Keats, AS. The ASA classification of physical status—a recapitulation. Anesthesiology 1978;49:233–236.Google Scholar
14.Mangram, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearson, ML, Silver, LC, Jarvis, WR, the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:247–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Goodman, LA, Kruskal, WH. Measures of association for cross classifications. American Statistical Association Journal 1954;49:732–764.Google Scholar
16.Wasser, TE. A software to calculate Goodman and Kruskal's Gamma: a method to monitor surgical-site infection rates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:869–871.Google Scholar
17.Kirkwood, B. Essentials of Medical Statistics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1998:138.Google Scholar