Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:35:51.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Safe and Cost-Effective Cleaning of Pressure-Monitoring Transducers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Richard Platt ,
John L. Lehr ,
Susan Marino ,
Alvaro Munoz ,
Barbara Nash  and
Daniel B. Raemer
Richard Platt*
Affiliation:
Channing Laboratory, Departments of Medicine, Anesthesia and Biomedical Engineering, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
John L. Lehr
Affiliation:
Channing Laboratory, Departments of Medicine, Anesthesia and Biomedical Engineering, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Susan Marino
Affiliation:
Channing Laboratory, Departments of Medicine, Anesthesia and Biomedical Engineering, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Alvaro Munoz
Affiliation:
Channing Laboratory, Departments of Medicine, Anesthesia and Biomedical Engineering, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Barbara Nash
Affiliation:
Channing Laboratory, Departments of Medicine, Anesthesia and Biomedical Engineering, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Daniel B. Raemer
Affiliation:
Channing Laboratory, Departments of Medicine, Anesthesia and Biomedical Engineering, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
*
Channing Laboratory, 180 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The CDC category I recommendation for high-level disinfection of pressure-monitoring transducers between uses imposes substantial costs. This practice has not been shown to be useful when disposable transducer domes are used. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study assessed the consequences of wiping transducers with alcohol between uses rather than sterilizing with ethylene oxide. We studied 5,197 transducer courses with disposable domes involving 2,202 patients in intensive care units during 15 months. There was no significant difference between the two treatment regimens in the risk of positive cultures of fluids from monitored lines, of cultures of cannula tips or of a positive blood culture. We conclude that under normal conditions, ie, in the absence of a cluster of transducer-related bacteremias, wiping transducers with alcohol between uses is sufficient when disposable domes are used.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 9 , Issue 9 , September 1988 , pp. 409 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Fisher, MC, Long, SS. Roberts, EM, et al: Pseudomonas maltophilia bacteremia in children undergoing open heart surgery. JAMA 1985; 246:1571–1574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Maki, DG, Hassemer, CA: Endemic rate of fluid contamination and related septicemia in arterial pressure monitoring. Am J Med 1981: 70:733–738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Donowitz, LG, Marsik, FJ, Hoyt, JW, et al: Serratia marcescens bacteremia from contaminated pressure transducers. JAMA 1979; 242:1749–1751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Buxton, AE, Anderson, RL. Klimek, J, et al: Failure of disposable domes to prevent septicemia acquired from contaminated pressure transducers. Chest 1981; 74:508–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Aduan, RP, Iannini, PB, Salaki, J: Nosocomial bacteremia associated with contaminated blood pressure transducers. Report of an outbreak and a review of the literature. Am J Infect Control 1980; 8:33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Maki, DG, Band, JD: Septicemia from disposable pressure-monitoring chamber domes: “Beware of Greeks bearing gifts“. Chest 1981; 74:486–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Monitoring devices and septicaemia. Br Med J 1981; 1:1747–1748.Google Scholar
8. Centers for Disease Control: Guideline for prevention of infections related to intravascular pressure-monitoring systems, in Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Nosocomial injections. 1985; 68–72.Google Scholar
9. Talbot, GH, Skros, M, Provencher, M: 70% Alcohol disinfection of transducer heads: Experimental trials. Infect Control 1985; 6:237–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Peto, R, Pike, MC, Armitage, P, et al: Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient: II. Analysis and examples. Br J Cancer 1977; 35:1–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Armitage, P: Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications. 1971.Google Scholar
12. Rothman, KJ, Boice, JD Jr: Epidemiologic analyses with a programmable calculator. NIH publication 79-1649. US Government Printing Office, no. 017-042-00143-9, Washington, DC, 1979.Google Scholar