Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:28:53.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Cytotoxin-Positive Diarrhea After Control for Horizontal Transmission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Richard Kent Zimmerman
Richard Kent Zimmerman*
Affiliation:
Department of Family Practice, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
*
Department of Family Practice, Box 381 UMHC, 516 Delaware St., SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

This study identifies risk factors that predispose hospitalized patients to diarrhea caused by Clostridium difficile.

Design:

Unlike most previous studies, this case-control study accounts for horizontal (person-to-person) transmission of this infectious organism by matching on location.

Setting:

An urban community hospital of 600 beds with both primary care and referred patients.

Patients:

Both the 36 cases and the 36 controls came from billing printouts for C difficile cytotoxin assays. Exclusion criteria included outpatient specimens and stays of 38 days or more. Controls had negative assays and were individually matched on the basis of the floor and by the general date of specimen collection.

Results:

Cases had a longer mean duration of antibiotic use (6.7 versus 4.1 days, p = .006). Of the other 22 factors that were evaluated for their risk of predisposing to C difficile, only clindamycin (OR = 3.50, p =.09) and third-generation cephalosporins (OR = 3.00, p = .04) showed any association. The odds ratio for third-generation cephalosporins in the absence of clindamycin was 3.50 (p = .09). Data were collected by physicians who were not blinded.

Conclusions:

This study found that the clindamycin and third-generation cephalosporins were risk factors for C difficile-associated diarrhea after controlling for horizontal transmission. First-generation cephalosporins were not risk factors (OR= 0.86), while sample size considerations prevented firm conclusions about second-generation cephalosporins (OR = 1.67, p = .23). Many of the previously alleged risk factors might be explained by the horizontal transmission of an infectious disease; for instance, this seems a better explanation for an outbreak on a surgery ward than does surgery itself. (Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991;12:96-100.)

Type
Brief Report
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , February 1991 , pp. 96 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cannon, DR, Dyson, PHP, Sander-son, PJ. Pseudomembranous colitis associated with antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg. 1988;70:600–602.10.1302/0301-620X.70B4.3403605Google Scholar
2. Nolan, NPM, Kelly, CP, Humphreys, JFH, et al. An epidemic of pseudomembranous colitis: importance of person-to-person spread. Gut. 1987;28:1467–1473.10.1136/gut.28.11.1467Google Scholar
3. Talbot, RW, Walker, RC, Beart, RW Jr. Changing epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of Clostridium difficile toxin-associated colitis. Br J Surg. 1986;73:457–460.10.1002/bjs.1800730614Google Scholar
4. Hall, SM, Calver, GP, William, M. A hospital outbreak of Clostridium difficile? J Hosp Infect. 1985;6:312–322.Google Scholar
5. Cudmore, HA, Silva, J Jr, Fekety, R, et al. Clostridium difficile colitis associated with cancer chemotherapy. Arch Intern Med. 1982;142:333–335.10.1001/archinte.1982.00340150133022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Malamou-Ladas, H, Farrell, SO, Nash, JO, Tabaqchali, S. Isolation of Clostridium difficile from patients and the environment of hospital wards. J Clin Pathol. 1983;36:88–92.10.1136/jcp.36.1.88Google Scholar
7. Fekety, R, Kim, KH, Brown, D, Barts, DH, Cudmore, M, Silva, J. Epidemiology of antibiotic-associated colitis: isolation of Clostridium difficile from the hospital environment. Am J Med. 1981;70:906–908.10.1016/0002-9343(81)90553-2Google Scholar
8. McFarland, LV, Mulligan, ME, Kwok, RYY, Stamm, WE. Nosocomial acquisition of Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:204–210.Google Scholar
9. Sherertz, RJ, Sarubbi, FA. The prevalence of Clostridium difficile and toxin in a nursery population: acomparison between patients with necrotizing enterocolitis and an asymptomatic group. J Pediatrics. 1982;100:435–439.10.1016/S0022-3476(82)80455-1Google Scholar
10. Kim, K, DuPont, HL, Picker, LK. Outbreaks of diarrhea associated with Closfridium dificile and its toxin in daycare centers: evidence of person-to-person spread. J Pediatr. 1983;102:376–382.10.1016/S0022-3476(83)80652-0Google Scholar
11. Burdon, DW. Clostridium dificile: the epidemiology and prevention of hospital-acquired infection. Infection. 1982;10:203–204.Google Scholar
12. Delmee, M, Bulliard, G, Simon, G. Application of a technique for serogrouping Closfridium dificile in an outbreak of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. J Infect. 1986;13:5–9.10.1016/S0163-4453(86)92095-5Google Scholar
13. McFarland, LV, Stamm, WE. Review of Closfridium difficile-associated diseases. Am J Infect Control. 1986;14:99–109.Google Scholar
14. Tedesco, FJ. Barton, RW, Alpers, DH. Clindamycin-associated colitis: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med. 1974;81:429–433.Google Scholar
15. Kabins, SA, Spira, TJ. Outbreak of clindamycin-associated colitis. Ann Intern Med. 1975;83:830–831.10.7326/0003-4819-83-6-830Google Scholar
16. Trynka, YM, LaMont, JT. Association of Clostridium dificile toxin with symptomatic relapse of chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 1981;80:693–696.10.1016/0016-5085(81)90127-XGoogle Scholar
17. Gerding, DN, Olson, MM, Peterson, LR, et al. Clostridium dificile-associated diarrhea and colitis in adults. Arch Intern Med. 1986;146:95–100.10.1001/archinte.1986.00360130117016Google Scholar
18. Dorman, SA, Liggoria, E, Winn, WC Jr., Beeken, WL. Isolation of Closfridium dificile from patients with inactive Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 1982;82:1348–1351.10.1016/0016-5085(82)90068-3Google Scholar
19. Lyerly, DM, Krivan, HC, Wilkins, TD. Clostridium dificile: its disease and toxins. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1988;1:1–18.Google Scholar
20. Rosner, B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 2nd ed. Boston, Mass: Duxbury Press; 1986.Google Scholar
21. Peterson, LR, Olson, MM, Shanholtzer, CJ, Gerding, DN. Results of a prospective, eighteen-month clinical evaluation of culture, cytotoxin testing, and Culturette Brand (CDT) latex testing in the diagnosis of C difficile-associated diarrhea. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988;10:85–91.Google Scholar
22. Gerding, DN. Disease associated with Clostridium difficile infection. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:255–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Lashner, BA, Todorczuk, J, Sahm, DF, Hanauer, SB. Clostridium difficile culture-positive toxin-negative diarrhea. Am J Gastroenterol. 1986;81:940–943.Google Scholar
24. Pierce, PF Wilson, JS, Garagusi, VF, et al. Antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis: an epidemiological investigation of a cluster of cases. J Infect Dis. 1982;145:269–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed