Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:34:57.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risk Assessment in Infection Control: Which Risks?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Michael Millar
Michael Millar*
Affiliation:
Barts and The London NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
*
Barts and The London NHS Trust, 3rd Floor, Pathology and Pharmacy Building, 80 Newark Street, London El 2ES, UK ([email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , April 2008 , pp. 381 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2008

References

1.Stelfox, HT, Bates, DW, Redelmeier, DA. Safety of patients isolated for infection control. JAMA 2003;290:1899–1905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Bryan, CS, Call, TJ, Elliott, KC. The ethics of infection control: philosophical frameworks. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:1077–1084.Google Scholar
3.Saracci, R. The world health organisation needs to reconsider its definition of health. BMJ 1997;314:1409–1411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Powers, M, Faden, R. The Moral Foundations of Public Health and Health Policy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
5.Nussbaum, MC. Frontiers of Justice: disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
6.Public Health: ethical issues. London, England: Nuffield Council on Bio-ethics; 2007.Google Scholar
7.Mill, JS. On liberty. In: Collini, S, ed. On Liberty and Other Essays. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1989:13.Google Scholar
8.UK Neonatal Staffing Study Group. Patient volume, staffing, and workload in relation to risk-adjusted outcomes in a random stratified sample of UK neonatal intensive care units: a prospective evaluation. Lancet 2002;359:99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Standards for hospitals providing neonatal intensive and high dependency care. 2nd ed. London, England: British Association of Perinatal Medicine; 2001.Google Scholar
10.BLISS Web page. Special delivery or second class: are we failing special care babies in the UK? Available at: http://www.bliss.org.uk/pdfs/baby-report_updateweb.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2008.Google Scholar