Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:34:04.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research Methods in Healthcare Epidemiology: Survey and Qualitative Research

Part of: Research and Methodology in Infection Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2016

Nasia Safdar ,
Lilian M. Abbo ,
Mary Jo Knobloch  and
Susan K. Seo
Nasia Safdar*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
Lilian M. Abbo
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Jackson Health System. Miami, Florida
Mary Jo Knobloch
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin
Susan K. Seo
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Infectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
*
Address correspondence to Nasia Safdar, MD, PhD, 5138 MFCB 1685 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53703 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Surveys are one of the most frequently employed study designs in healthcare epidemiology research. Generally easier to undertake and less costly than many other study designs, surveys can be invaluable to gain insights into opinions and practices in large samples and may be descriptive and/or be used to test associations. In this context, qualitative research methods may complement this study design either at the survey development phase and/or at the interpretation/extension of results stage. This methods article focuses on key considerations for designing and deploying surveys in healthcare epidemiology and antibiotic stewardship, including identification of whether or not de novo survey development is necessary, ways to optimally lay out and display a survey, denominator measurement, discussion of biases to keep in mind particularly in research using surveys, and the role of qualitative research methods to complement surveys. We review examples of surveys in healthcare epidemiology and antimicrobial stewardship and review the pros and cons of methods used. A checklist is provided to help aid design and deployment of surveys in healthcare epidemiology and antimicrobial stewardship.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;1–6

Type
SHEA White Papers
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 37 , Issue 11 , November 2016 , pp. 1272 - 1277
Copyright
© 2016 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Fowler, F Jr. Survey Research Methods. Applied Social Research Methods Series, no. 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009.Google Scholar
2. Dillman, DA, Smyth, JD, Christian, LM. Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.Google Scholar
3. Groves, RM, Fowler, FJ, Couper, MP, Lepkowki, JM, Singer, E, Tourangeau, R. Survey Methodology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.Google Scholar
4. Abbo, L, Lo, K, Sinkowitz-Cochran, R, et al. Antimicrobial stewardship programs in Florida’s acute care facilities. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:634–637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Funkhouser, E, Vellala, K, Baltuck, C, et al. Survey methods to optimize response rate in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Eval Health Prof 2016.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Greenlaw, C, Brown-Welty, S. A comparison of web-based and paper-based survey methods: testing assumptions of survey mode and response cost. Eval Rev 2009;33:464–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Fan, W, Yan, Z. Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: a systematic review. Comput Human Behav 2010;26:132–139.Google Scholar
8. Fitzpatrick, R, Boulton, M. Qualitative methods for assessing health care. Qual Health Care 1994;3:107–113.Google Scholar
9. Curry, LA, Nembhard, IM, Bradley, EH. Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation 2009;119:1442–1452.Google Scholar
10. Patton, M. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002.Google Scholar
11. Kuper, A, Lingard, L, Levinson, W. Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ 2008;337:a1035.Google Scholar
12. Anderson, C. Presenting and evaluating qualitative research. Am J Pharm Educ 2010;74:141.Google Scholar
13. Mays, N, Pope, C. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 2000;320:50–52.Google Scholar
14. Kuper, A, Reeves, S, Levinson, W. An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research. BMJ 2008;337:a288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Drees, M, Pineles, L, Harris, AD, Morgan, DJ. Variation in definitions and isolation procedures for multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria: a survey of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Research Network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:362–366.Google Scholar
16. Glanz, JM, Wagner, NM, Narwaney, KJ, et al. A mixed methods study of parental vaccine decision making and parent-provider trust. Acad Pediatr 2013;13:481–488.Google Scholar
17. Choi, BC, Pak, AW. A catalog of biases in questionnaires. Prev Chronic Dis 2005;2:A13.Google Scholar