Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:44:44.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regional Supervision of Healthcare Institutions With a Focus on Antimicrobial Resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2020

Robbin Westerhof
Affiliation:
Dutch Health and Youth Care Inspectorate
Lisanne de Boer
Affiliation:
Dutch Health and Youth Care Inspectorate
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background: Resistance to antibiotic drugs, also called antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a serious threat to (public) health. Surveillance reports throughout the world show that formation and spread of highly resistant microorganisms (HRMOs) continues to be substantial. In The Netherlands, 10 regional collaborative networks on AMR have been established among healthcare institutions to mitigate the existing risks concerning HRMO by collaborative actions in antibiotic stewardship and infection prevention. Objective: We sought to determine whether the healthcare institutions in one of the regional collaborative networks in The Netherlands contribute adequately to reducing the risks of formation and/or spread of HRMO. Methods: The Health and Youth Care Inspectorate in The Netherlands visited 37 institutions in the region of Limburg (the southern province). The following healthcare sectors were included: hospitals (n = 5), rehabilitation clinics (n = 2), long-term care facilities (n = 5), homecare institutions (n = 4), mental healthcare institutions (n = 2), dental care clinics (n = 4), general practitioners (GPs; n = 10), municipal health services (n = 2) and healthcare facilities for mentally disabled people (n = 3). In each visit, 5 topics were addressed: antibiotic policy, infection prevention, information transfer, governance and collaboration in the region. Results and Conclusions: In general, the healthcare institutions had an adequate to good score. Good results were seen in antibiotic policy (ie, the use of diagnostic tools to avoid the use of antibiotics); information transfer among GPs and in homecare institutions; and infection prevention in homecare institutions and dental care clinics. Exceptions with inadequate scores were observed in several areas: absence of prescription guidance specifically for antibiotics in various sectors; infection prevention among GPs, and dental care clinics. In 4 cases (ie, 3 GPs and 1 dental care clinic), we stopped using the autoclave because of lack of proof of proper maintenance.

Funding: None

Disclosures: None

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
© 2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.