Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:43:07.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Readers' Forum Results of a Survey of Infection Control Practices for Respiratory Therapy Equipment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Theresa A. Goularte  and
Donald E. Craven
Theresa A. Goularte
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Boston City Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Donald E. Craven*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Boston City Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
*
Maxwell Finland Laboratory for Infectious Diseases, Boston City Hospital, Boston, MA 02118
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The responses to a comprehensive survey of infection control practices for respiratory therapy equipment, previously published in the Readers' Forum section of Infection Control, are summarized in Tables 1 through 3. Responses were obtained from 205 United States hospitals; 65% were community hospitals and 38% had <500 ventilator days/year. In some cases, the total number of responses exceeded 100% because of practices that required multiple responses.

Type
Special Sections
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 7 , Issue 6 , June 1986 , pp. 327 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Craven, DE, Connolly, MG Jr, Goularte, TA: Results of a survey of ventilator circuit practices in the United States. Infect Control 1984; 5:353–356.Google Scholar
2. Simmons, BP, Wong, ES: Guidelines for prevention of nosocomial pneumonia. Infect Control 1982; 3:327–333.Google Scholar
3. Craven, DE, Connolly, MG Jr, Lichtenberg, DA, et al: Contamination of mechanical ventilators with tubing changes at 24 and 48 hours. N Engl J Med 1982; 306:1505–1509.Google Scholar
4. Craven, DE, Kunches, LM, Kilinsky, V, et al: Risk factors for pneumonia in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986; 133.Google Scholar
5. Boyce, JM, White, RL, Spruill, EY, et al: Cost-effective application of the Centers for Disease Control Guideline for prevention of nosocomial pneumonia. Am J Infect Control 1985; 13:228–232.Google Scholar
6. Lamb, VA, Mayhall, CG, Dalton, HP, et al: Pneumonia in patients on ventilator support: Relationship to microbial flora of ventilator circuits. 25th Inter-science Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 1985, Minneapolis, MN (Abstract #446).Google Scholar
7. Reinarz, JA, Pierce, AK, Mays, BB, et al: The potential role of inhalation therapy equipment in nosocomial pulmonary infection. J Clin Invest 1965; 44:831–839.Google Scholar
8. Edmondson, EB, Reinarz, JA, Pierce, Ak, et al: Nebulization equipment: A potential source of infection in gram-negative pneumonias. Am J Dis Child 1966; 111:357–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Pierce, AK, Sanford, JP: Bacterial contamination of aerosols. Arch Intern Med 1971; 131:156–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Craven, DE, Goularte, TA, Make, BJ: Contaminated condensate in mechanical ventilator circuits: A risk factor for nosocomial pneumonia? Am Rev Respir Dis 1984; 129:625–628.Google ScholarPubMed
11. Craven, DE, Lichtenberg, DA, Goularte, TA, et al: Contaminated medication nebulizers in mechanical ventilator circuits: A source of bacterial aerosols. Am J Med 1984; 77:834–838.Google Scholar
12. Mabaquiao, P, Wical, H, Elder, H, et al: Microbial factors affecting frequency of change in nebulizer therapy. 23rd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 1983, Las Vegas, NV (Abstract #810).Google Scholar