Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:35:09.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Raising Standards While Watching the Bottom Line Making a Business Case for Infection Control

Part of: Developing an Infection Control Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2016

Eli N. Perencevich ,
Patricia W. Stone ,
Sharon B. Wright ,
Yehuda Carmeli ,
David N. Fisman  and
Sara E. Cosgrove
Eli N. Perencevich*
Affiliation:
Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, Maryland Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Patricia W. Stone
Affiliation:
Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York
Sharon B. Wright
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Yehuda Carmeli
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
David N. Fisman
Affiliation:
Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, Research Institute of the Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Ontario Public Health Laboratories Branch, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Sara E. Cosgrove
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases and Antibiotic Management Program, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
*
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Associate Hospital Epidemiologist, University of Maryland Medical Center, 100 N. Greene St., Lower Level, Baltimore, MD 21201 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While society would benefit from a reduced incidence of nosocomial infections, there is currently no direct reimbursement to hospitals for the purpose of infection control, which forces healthcare institutions to make economic decisions about funding infection control activities. Demonstrating value to administrators is an increasingly important function of the hospital epidemiologist because healthcare executives are faced with many demands and shrinking budgets. Aware of the difficulties that face local infection control programs, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Board of Directors appointed a task force to draft this evidence-based guideline to assist hospital epidemiologists in justifying and expanding their programs. In Part 1, we describe the basic steps needed to complete a business-case analysis for an individual institution. A case study based on a representative infection control intervention is provided. In Part 2, we review important basic economic concepts and describe approaches that can be used to assess the financial impact of infection prevention, surveillance, and control interventions, as well as the attributable costs of specific healthcare-associated infections. Both parts of the guideline aim to provide the hospital epidemiologist, infection control professional, administrator, and researcher with the tools necessary to complete a thorough business-case analysis and to undertake an outcome study of a nosocomial infection or an infection control intervention.

Type
SHEA Guideline
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 28 , Issue 10 , October 2007 , pp. 1121 - 1133
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2007 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Casalino, LP. Markets and medicine: barriers to creating a “business case for quality.” Perspect Biol Med 2003;46:38–51.Google Scholar
2. Murphy, DM. From expert data collectors to interventionists: changing the focus for infection control professionals. Am J Infect Control 2002;30:120–132.Google Scholar
3. Burke, JP. Infection control—a problem for patient safety. New Engl J Med 2003;348:651–656.Google Scholar
4. Calfee, DP, Farr, BM. Infection control and cost control in the era of managed care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:407–410.Google Scholar
5. Murphy, DM, Alvarado, CI, Fawal, H. The business of infection control and epidemiology. Am J Infect Control 2002;30:75–76.Google Scholar
6. Wright, SB, Ostrowsky, B, Fishman, N, et al. Hospital epidemiology and infection control roles expanding despite limited resources and compensation. In: Program and abstracts of the 17th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology in America (Baltimore). 2007 (Abstract 55).Google Scholar
7. Heffler, S, Smith, S, Keehan, S, Borger, C, Clemens, MK, Truffer, C. US health spending projections for 2004-2014. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;suppl Web exclusives:W5-74-W5-85.Google Scholar
8. Stone, PW, Schackman, BR, Neukermans, CP, et al. A synthesis of cost-utility analysis literature in infectious disease. Lancet Infect Dis 2005;5:383–391.Google Scholar
9. Drummond, MF, Sculpher, MJ, Torrance, GW, O'Brien, BJ, Stoddart, GL. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press;2005.Google Scholar
10. Gold, MR, Siegel, JE, Russell, LB, Weinstein, MC. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. 1st ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press;1996.Google Scholar
11. Petitti, DB. Meta-analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press;2000.Google Scholar
12. Leatherman, S, Berwick, D, Iles, D, et al. The business case for quality: case studies and an analysis. Health Aff (Millwood) 2003;22:17–30.Google Scholar
13. Stone, PW, Braccia, D, Larson, E. Systematic review of economic analyses of health care-associated infections. Am J Infect Control 2005;33:501–509.Google Scholar
14. Mansley, EC, McKenna, MT. Importance of perspective in economic analyses of cancer screening decisions. Lancet 2001;358:1169–1173.Google Scholar
15. McGregor, JC, Weekes, E, Forrest, GN, et al. Impact of a computerized clinical decision support system on reducing inappropriate antimicrobial use: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:378–384.Google Scholar
16. Harris, AD, Bradham, DD, Baumgarten, M, Zuckerman, IH, Fink, JC, Perencevich, EN. The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:1586–1591.Google Scholar
17. 2006 APIC Member Salary and Career Survey. Available at: http://www.apic.org/Content/NavigationMenu/MemberServices/2006SalarySurveyResults/2006_Salary_Survey.htm. Accessed September 1, 2006.Google Scholar
18. McConkey, SJ, L'Ecuyer, PB, Murphy, DM, Leet, TL, Sundt, TM, Fraser, VJ. Results of a comprehensive infection control program for reducing surgical-site infections in coronary artery bypass surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:533–538.Google Scholar
19. Dietrich, ES, Demmler, M, Schulgen, G, et al. Nosocomial pneumonia: a cost-of-illness analysis. Infection 2002;30:61–67.Google Scholar
20. Hugonnet, S, Eggimann, P, Borst, F, Maricot, P, Chevrolet, JC, Pittet, D. Impact of ventilator-associated pneumonia on resource utilization and patient outcome. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:1090–1096.Google Scholar
21. Warren, DK, Shukla, SJ, Olsen, MA, et al. Outcome and attributable cost of ventilator-associated pneumonia among intensive care unit patients in a suburban medical center. Crit Care Med 2003;31:1312–1317.Google Scholar
22. Rello, J, Ollendorf, DA, Oster, G, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a large US database. Chest 2002;122:2115–2121.Google Scholar
23. Safdar, N, Dezfulian, C, Collard, HR, Saint, S. Clinical and economic consequences of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2005;33:2184–2193.Google Scholar
24. Blot, SI, Depuydt, P, Annemans, L, et al. Clinical and economic outcomes in critically ill patients with nosocomial catheter-related bloodstream infections. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41:1591–1598.Google Scholar
25. Digiovine, B, Chenoweth, C, Watts, C, Higgins, M. The attributable mortality and costs of primary nosocomial bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:976–981.Google Scholar
26. Rello, J, Ochagavia, A, Sabanes, E, et al. Evaluation of outcome of intravenous catheter-related infections in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:1027–1030.Google Scholar
27. Coello, R, Charlett, A, Wilson, J, Ward, V, Pearson, A, Bordello, P. Adverse impact of surgical site infections in English hospitals. J Hosp Infect 2005;60:93–103.Google Scholar
28. Coskun, D, Aytac, J, Aydinli, A, Bayer, A. Mortality rate, length of stay and extra cost of sternal surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass grafting in a private medical centre in Turkey. J Hosp Infect 2005;60:176–179.Google Scholar
29. Hollenbeak, CS, Murphy, DM, Koenig, S, Woodward, RS, Dunagan, WC, Fraser, VJ. The clinical and economic impact of deep chest surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Chest 2000;118:397–402.Google Scholar
30. Jenney, AW, Harrington, GA, Russo, PL, Spelman, DW. Cost of surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass surgery. ANZ J Surg 2001;71:662–664.Google Scholar
31. Tambyah, PA, Knasinski, V, Maki, DG. The direct costs of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the era of managed care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:27–31.Google Scholar
32. Lai, KK, Fontecchio, SA. Use of silver-hydrogel urinary catheters on the incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients. Am J Infect Control 2002;30:221–225.Google Scholar
33. Dimick, JB, Weeks, WB, Karia, RJ, Das, S, Campbell, DA Jr. Who pays for poor surgical quality? Building a business case for quality improvement. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:933–937.Google Scholar
34. Ward, WJ Jr, Spragens, L, Smithson, K. Building the business case for clinical quality. Healthc Financ Manage 2006;60:92–98.Google Scholar
35. Roberts, RR, Frutos, PW, Ciavarella, GG, et al. Distribution of variable vs fixed costs of hospital care. JAMA 1999;281:644–649.Google Scholar
36. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare and Medicaid statistical supplement: details for Medicare short-stay hospitals. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov. Accessed July 17, 2007.Google Scholar
37. Wright, MO, Hebden, JN, Harris, AD, et al. Aggressive control measures for resistant Acinetobacter haumannii and the impact on acquisition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in a medical intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:167–168.Google Scholar
38. Guinan, JL, McGuckin, M, Shubin, A, Tighe, J. A descriptive review of malpractice claims for health care-acquired infections in Philadelphia. Am J Infect Control 2005;33:310–312.Google Scholar
39. Julian, KG, Brumbach, AM, Chicora, MK, et al. First year of mandatory reporting of healthcare-associated infections, Pennsylvania: an infection control-chart abstractor collaboration. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:926–930.Google Scholar
40. Lindenauer, PK, Remus, D, Roman, S, et al. Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. New Engl J Med 2007;356:486–496.Google Scholar
41. Perencevich, EN, Fisman, DN, Lipsitch, M, Harris, AD, Morris, JG Jr, Smith, DL. Projected benefits of active surveillance for vancomycin-resistant enterococci in intensive care units. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:1108–1115.Google Scholar
42. Ginter, PM, Swayne, LE, Duncan, WJ. Strategic Management of Health Care Organizations. 4thed. Maiden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.;2002.Google Scholar
43. Dooley, RS, Fryxell, GE, Judge, WQ. Belaboring the not-so-obvious: consensus, commitment, and strategy implementation speed and success. J Management 2000;26:1237–1257.Google Scholar
44. Zanetti, G, Goldie, SJ, Piatt, R. Clinical consequences and cost of limiting use of vancomycin for perioperative prophylaxis: example of coronary artery bypass surgery. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:820–827.Google Scholar
45. Neumann, PJ. Using Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Improve Health Care. 1st ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press;2005.Google Scholar
46. Koplan, JP, Harpaz, R. Shingles vaccine: effective and costly or cost-effective? Ann Intern Med 2006;145:386–387.Google Scholar
47. World Health Organization (WHO). Choosing interventions that are cost effective (WHO-CHOICE) 2006. Available at: http://www.who.int/choice/costs/CER_levels/en/index.html. Accessed September 7, 2006.Google Scholar
48. Bell, CM, Urbach, DR, Ray, JG, et al. Bias in published cost effectiveness studies: systematic review. BMJ 2006;332:699–703.Google Scholar
49. US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Price Index, 2006. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/cpi/home.htm. Accessed April 29, 2007.Google Scholar
50. US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Price Index inflation calculator. Available at: http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl. Accessed April 29, 2007.Google Scholar
51. US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). How BLS measures price change for medical care services in the Consumer Price Index. March 1, 2007. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpifact4.htm. Accessed April 29, 2007.Google Scholar
52. Keeler, E, Cretin, S. Discounting of life-savings and other non-monetary effects. Management Sei 1983;29:300–306.Google Scholar
53. Engemann, JJ Carmeli, Y, Cosgrove, SE, et al. Adverse clinical and economic outcomes attributable to methicillin resistance among patients with Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:592–598.Google Scholar
54. Kaye, KS, Engemann, JJ, Mozaffari, E, Carmeli, Y. Reference group choice and antibiotic resistance outcomes. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:1125–1128.Google Scholar
55. Schulgen, G, Kropec, A, Kappstein, I, Daschner, F, Schumacher, M. Estimation of extra hospital stay attributable to nosocomial infections: heterogeneity and timing of events. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:409–417.Google Scholar
56. Knaus, WA, Draper, EA, Wagner, DP, Zimmerman, JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985;13:818–829.Google Scholar
57. Iezzoni, LI. The risks of risk adjustment. JAMA 1997;278:1600–1607.Google Scholar
58. Robins, JM. The control of confounding by intermediate variables. Stat Med 1989;8:679–701.Google Scholar
59. Perencevich, EN. Excess shock and mortality in Staphylococcus aureus related to methicillin resistance. Clin Infect Dis 2000;31:1311–1313.Google Scholar
60. Schwaber, MJ, Carmeli, Y. Antimicrobial resistance and patient outcomes: the hazards of adjustment. Crit Care 2006;10:164.Google Scholar
61. Charlson, ME, Pompei, P, Ales, KL, MacKenzie, CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373–383.Google Scholar
62. Von Korff, M, Wagner, EH, Saunders, K. A chronic disease score from automated pharmacy data. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:197–203.Google Scholar
63. Batista, R, Kaye, K, Yokoe, DS. Admission-specific chronic disease scores as alternative predictors of surgical site infection for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:802–808.Google Scholar
64. Kaye, KS, Sands, K, Donahue, JG, Chan, KA, Fishman, P, Platt, R. Preoperative drug dispensing as predictor of surgical site infection. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:57–65.Google Scholar
65. McGregor, JC, Kim, PW, Perencevich, EN, et al. Utility of the Chronic Disease Score and Charlson Comorbidity Index as comorbidity measures for use in epidemiologic studies of antibiotic-resistant organisms. Am J Epidemiol 2005;161:483–493.Google Scholar
66. McGregor, JC, Perencevich, EN, Furuno, JP, et al. Comorbidity risk-adjustment measures were developed and validated for studies of antibiotic-resistant infections. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:1266–1273.Google Scholar
67. Perencevich, EN, Sands, KE, Cosgrove, SE, Guadagnoli, E, Meara, E, Piatt, R. Health and economic impact of surgical site infections diagnosed after hospital discharge. Emerg Infect Dis 2003;9:196–203.Google Scholar
68. Cosgrove, SE, Carmeli, Y. The impact of antimicrobial resistance on health and economic outcomes. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:1433–1437.Google Scholar
69. Haley, RW. Measuring the costs of nosocomial infections: methods for estimating economic burden on the hospital. Am J Med 1991;91:32S–38S.Google Scholar
70. Finkler, SA. The distinction between cost and charge. Ann Intern Med 1982;96:102–109.Google Scholar
71. Pronovost, P, Angus, DC. Cost reduction and quality improvement: it takes two to tango. Crit Care Med 2000;28:581–583.Google Scholar
72. Howard, D, Cordell, R, McGowan, JE Jr, Packard, RM, Scott, RD 2nd, Solomon, SL. Measuring the economic costs of antimicrobial resistance in hospital settings: summary of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-Emory Workshop. Clin Infect Dis 2001;33:1573–1578.Google Scholar
73. Ashby, J. The accuracy of cost measures derived from Medicare cost report data, Intramural #1-93-01. Prospective Payment Assessment Commission. Washington, DC, 1993.Google Scholar
74. Shwartz, M, Young, DW, Siegrist, R. The ratio of costs to charges: how good a basis for estimating costs? Inquiry 1995;32:476–481.Google Scholar
75. Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Federal Reserve Economic Database II. Available at: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/categories/15. Accessed April 29, 2007.Google Scholar
76. Larson, E. State-of-the-science—2004: time for a “no excuses/no tolerance” (NET) strategy. Am J Infect Control 2005;33:548–557.Google Scholar
77. Classen, DC, Evans, RS, Pestotnik, SL, Horn, SD, Menlove, RL, Burke, JP. The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection. New Engl J Med 1992;326:281–286.Google Scholar
78. Benson, K, Hartz, AJ. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. Neyv Engl J Med 2000;342:1878–1886.Google Scholar
79. Concato, J, Shah, N, Horwitz, RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. New Engl J Med 2000;342:1887–1892.Google Scholar
80. Pocock, SJ, Elbourne, DR. Randomized trials or observational tribulations? New Engl J Med 2000;342:1907–1909.Google Scholar
81. Hayes, RJ, Alexander, ND, Bennett, S, Cousens, SN. Design and analysis issues in cluster-randomized trials of interventions against infectious diseases. Stat Methods Med Res 2000;9:95–116.Google Scholar
82. Klar, N, Donner, A. Current and future challenges in the design and analysis of cluster randomization trials. Stat Med 2001;20:3729–3740.Google Scholar
83. Medical Research Council. Cluster randomized trials: methodological and ethical considerations. MRS Clinical Trials Series, 2002. Available at: http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d=MRC002406. Accessed April 30, 2007.Google Scholar
84. Bennett, S, Parpia, T, Hayes, R, Cousens, S. Methods for the analysis of incidence rates in cluster randomized trials. Int J Epidemiol 2002;31:839–846.Google Scholar
85. Donner, A, Klar, N. Pitfalls of and controversies in cluster randomization trials. Am J Public Health 2004;94:416–422.Google Scholar
86. Elbourne, DR, Campbell, MK. Extending the CONSORT statement to cluster randomized trials: for discussion. Stat Med 2001;20;489–496.Google Scholar
87. Muto, CA, Giannetta, ET, Durbin, LJ, Simonton, BM, Farr, BM. Cost-effectiveness of perirectal surveillance cultures for controlling vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:429–435.Google Scholar
88. Rao, N, Jacobs, S, Joyce, L. Cost-effective eradication of an outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a community teaching hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1988;9:255–260.Google Scholar
89. Shadish, WR, Cook, TD, Campbell, DT. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company;2002.Google Scholar
90. Harris, AD, Lautenbach, E, Perencevich, E. A systematic review of quasi-experimental study designs in the fields of infection control and antibiotic resistance. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41:77–82.Google Scholar
91. Shadish, WR, Heinsman, DT. Experiments versus quasi-experiments: do they yield the same answer? NIDA Res Monogr 1997;170:147–164.Google Scholar
92. Austin, DJ, Bonten, MJ, Weinstein, RA, Slaughter, S, Anderson, RM. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci in intensive-care hospital settings: transmission dynamics, persistence, and the impact of infection control programs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:6908–6913.Google Scholar
93. Bergstrom, CT, Lo, M, Lipsitch, M. Ecological theory suggests that antimicrobial cycling will not reduce antimicrobial resistance in hospitals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:13285–13290.Google Scholar
94. Bonhoeffer, S, Lipsitch, M, Levin, BR. Evaluating treatment protocols to prevent antibiotic resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:12106–12111.Google Scholar
95. Bootsma, MC, Diekmann, O, Bonten, MJ. Controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: quantifying the effects of interventions and rapid diagnostic testing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:5620–5625.Google Scholar
96. Lipsitch, M, Cohen, T, Cooper, B, et al. Transmission dynamics and control of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Science 2003;300:1966–1970.Google Scholar
97. Perencevich, EN, Hartley, DM. Of models and methods: our analytic armamentarium applied to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:594–597.Google Scholar
98. Ostrowsky, B, Steinberg, JT, Farr, B, Sohn, AH, Sinkowitz-Cochran, RL, Jarvis, WR. Reality check: should we try to detect and isolate vancomycin-resistant enterococci patients? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:116–119.Google Scholar
99. Hunink, M, Glasziou, P, Siegel, J, et al. Decision Making in Health and Medicine. 1st ed. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press;2001.Google Scholar