Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:09:25.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Prospective Observational Study of the Effect of Penicillin Skin Testing on Antibiotic Use in the Intensive Care Unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Mercedes E. Arroliga
Affiliation:
Allergy Section, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
Christine Radojicic
Affiliation:
Allergy Section, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
Steven M. Gordon*
Affiliation:
Infectious Disease Department, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
Marc J. Popovich
Affiliation:
Anesthesia Department, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
C. Allen Bashour
Affiliation:
Anesthesia Department, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
Alton L. Melton
Affiliation:
Allergy Section, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
Alejandro C. Arroliga
Affiliation:
Pulmonary and Critical Care Department, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
*
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Mailstop S32, Cleveland, OH 44195

Abstract

Background:

Patients with penicillin allergy admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) frequently receive non-beta-lactam antimicrobials for the treatment of infection. The use of these antimicrobials, more commonly vancomycin and fluoroquinolones, is associated with the emergence of multidrug-resistant infections. The penicillin skin test (PST) can help detect patients at risk of developing an immediate allergic reaction to penicillin and those patients with a negative PST may be able to use a penicillin antibiotic safely.

Methods:

We determined the incidence of true penicillin allergy, the percentage of patients changed to a beta-lactam antimicrobial when the test was negative, the safety of the test, and the safety of administration of beta-lactam antimicrobials in patients with a negative test. Skin testing was performed using standard methodology.

Results:

One hundred patients admitted to 4 ICUs were prospectively studied; 58 of them were male. The mean age was 63 years. Ninety-six patients had the PST: one was positive (1.04%), 10 (10.4%) were nondiagnostic, and 85 (88.5%) were negative. Of the 38 patients who received antimicrobials for therapeutic reasons, 31(81.5%) had the antibiotic changed to a beta-lactam antimicrobial after a negative reading versus 7 patients of the 57 (12%) who had received a prophylactic antimicrobial (P < .001). No adverse effects were reported after the PST or after antimicrobial administration.

Conclusions:

The PST is a safe, reliable, and effective strategy to reduce the use of non-beta-lactam antimicrobials in patients who are labeled as penicillin allergic and admitted to the ICU.

Type
Orginal Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Salkind, AR, Cuddy, PG, Foxworth, JW. Is this patient allergic to penicillin? An evidence-base analysis of the likelihood of penicillin allergy. JAMA 2001;285:24982505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Lee, CE, Zembower, TR, Fotis, MAet al.The incidence of antimicrobial allergies in hospitalized patients: implication regarding prescribing patterns and emerging bacterial resistance. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:28192822.Google Scholar
3.Arroliga, ME, Wagner, W, Bobek, MB, Hoffman-Hogg, L, Gordon, SM, Arroliga, AC. A pilot study of penicillin skin testing in patients with a history of penicillin allergy admitted to a medical ICU. Chest 2000;118:11061108.Google Scholar
4.Solensky, R, Earl, HS, Gruchalla, RS. Clinical approach to penicillin-allergic patients: a survey. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2000;84:329333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Yates, RR. New intervention strategies for reducing antibiotics resistance. Chest 1999;115(suppl):24S27S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Fridkin, SK, Edwards, JR, Courval, JM, et al.The effect of vancomycin and third-generation cephalosporins on prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in 126 US adult intensive care units. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:175183.Google Scholar
7.Murthy, R. Implementation of strategies to control antimicrobial resistance. Chest 2001;119(suppl):405S411S.Google Scholar
8.Niederman, MS. Impact of antibiotics resistance on clinical outcomes and the cost of care. Crit Care Med 2001;29:N114N120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Bernstein, IL, Gruchalla, RS, Lee, RE, et al.Disease management of drug hypersensitivity: a practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1999;83:665695.Google Scholar
10.Erffmeyer, JE, Blaiss, MS. Proving penicillin allergy. Postgrad Med J 1990;2:3341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Forrest, DM, Schellenber, RR, Thien, W, King, S, Anis, AH, Dodek, PM. Introduction of a practice guideline for penicillin skin testing improves the appropriateness of antibiotic therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:16851690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Lin, RY. A perspective on penicillin allergy. Arch Intern Med 1992;152:930937.Google Scholar
13.Harris, AD, Sauberman, L, Kabbash, L, Greineder, DK, Samore, MH. Penicillin skin testing: a way to optimize antibiotic utilization. Am J Med 1999;107:166168.Google Scholar
14.Li, JTC, Markus, PJ, Osmon, DR, Estes, L, Gosselin, VA, Hanssen, AD. Reduction of vancomycin use in orthopedic patients with a history of antibiotic allergy. Mayo Clin Proc 2000;75:902906.Google Scholar
15.Solensky, R, Earl, HS, Gruchalla, RS. Penicillin allergy: prevalence of vague history in skin test-positive patients. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2000;85:195199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Valyasevi, MA, Van Dellen, RG. Frequency of systematic reaction to penicillin skin tests. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2000;85:363365.Google Scholar
17.Husni, RN, Goldstein, LS, Arroliga, AC, et al.Risk factors for an outbreak of multi-drug-resistant Acinetobacter nosocomial pneumonia among intubated patients. Chest 1999;115:13781382.Google Scholar
18.Villers, D, Espaze, E, Coste-Burel, M, et al.Nosocomial Acinetobacter baumannii infection: microbiological and clinical epidemiology. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:182189.Google Scholar