Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:55:28.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prophylaxis of Cesarean Sections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Elliot Frank
Elliot Frank*
Affiliation:
Neptune, New Jersey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Departments
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 11 , Issue 5 , May 1990 , pp. 228
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1990

References

1. Dougherty, SH, Williams, VS. Prophylaxis for cesarean section: where to turn. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1990;11:9.10.2307/30144248Google Scholar
2. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Med Lett Drugs Ther. 1989;31:105–108.Google Scholar
3. Galask, RP, Werner, C, Petzold, CR. Comparison of single dose cefmetazole and cefotetan prophylaxis in women undergoing primary cesarean section. J Antimicrob Chemother 1989;23(suppl D):105–108.10.1093/jac/23.suppl_D.105Google Scholar
4. Engel, K, Schmidt, W, Sonntag, HG, Kees, F. Comparative clinical and pharmacokinetic aspects of cefotetan versus cefoxitin plus in vaginal hysterectomy. Chemioterapia. 1988;7:256–260.Google Scholar
5. Periti, P, Mazzei, T., Periti, E. Prophylaxis in gynecological and obstetric surgery: a comparative randomized milti-center study of single dose cefotetan versus two doses of cefazolin. Chemioterapia. 1988;7:245–252.Google ScholarPubMed