Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:30:02.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prolonged silent carriage, genomic virulence potential and transmission between staff and patients characterize a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2022

Sharline Madera*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
Nicole McNeil
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Prevention, University of California, San Francisco, California
Paula Hayakawa Serpa
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
Jack Kamm
Affiliation:
Genentech, Redwood City, California
Christy Pak
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Prevention, University of California, San Francisco, California
Carolyn Caughell
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Prevention, University of California, San Francisco, California
Amy Nichols
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Prevention, University of California, San Francisco, California
David Dynerman
Affiliation:
The Public Health Company, Santa Barbara, California
Lucy M. Li
Affiliation:
The Public Health Company, Santa Barbara, California
Estella Sanchez-Guerrero
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
Maira S. Phelps
Affiliation:
Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, California
Angela M. Detweiler
Affiliation:
Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, California
Norma Neff
Affiliation:
Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, California
Helen Reyes
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, California
Steve A. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, California
Deborah S. Yokoe
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Prevention, University of California, San Francisco, California
Joseph L. DeRisi
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, California
Lynn Ramirez-Avila
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, California
Charles R. Langelier
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Prevention, University of California, San Francisco, California Genentech, Redwood City, California
*
Author for correspondence: Sharline Madera, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important pathogen in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) that confers significant morbidity and mortality.

Objective:

Improving our understanding of MRSA transmission dynamics, especially among high-risk patients, is an infection prevention priority.

Methods:

We investigated a cluster of clinical MRSA cases in the NICU using a combination of epidemiologic review and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of isolates from clinical and surveillance cultures obtained from patients and healthcare personnel (HCP).

Results:

Phylogenetic analysis identified 2 genetically distinct phylogenetic clades and revealed multiple silent-transmission events between HCP and infants. The predominant outbreak strain harbored multiple virulence factors. Epidemiologic investigation and genomic analysis identified a HCP colonized with the dominant MRSA outbreak strain who cared for most NICU patients who were infected or colonized with the same strain, including 1 NICU patient with severe infection 7 months before the described outbreak. These results guided implementation of infection prevention interventions that prevented further transmission events.

Conclusions:

Silent transmission of MRSA between HCP and NICU patients likely contributed to a NICU outbreak involving a virulent MRSA strain. WGS enabled data-driven decision making to inform implementation of infection control policies that mitigated the outbreak. Prospective WGS coupled with epidemiologic analysis can be used to detect transmission events and prompt early implementation of control strategies.

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) remains a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Reference Lake, Weiner, Milstone, Saiman, Magill and See1 Critically ill and preterm neonates are particularly vulnerable to invasive infections with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), which confers significant morbidity, mortality, Reference Shah, Jefferies, Yoon, Lee and Shah2,Reference Song, Perencevich, Campos, Short and Singh3 and financial costs. Reference Song, Perencevich, Campos, Short and Singh3 Nevertheless, the risk factors and mechanisms of transmission of MRSA in NICUs are incompletely understood.

Although MRSA colonization has been identified as a risk factor for the development of invasive infection, Reference Zervou, Zacharioudakis, Ziakas and Mylonakis4 the specific factors contributing to transmission of MRSA between NICU patients are not well defined. Factors previously identified include environmental reservoirs because outbreak-associated MRSA strains can exhibit longer environmental persistence than sporadic-MRSA isolates. Reference Wagenvoort, Sluijsmans and Penders5 Parental colonization has been described as a source of MRSA both via vertical Reference Jimenez-Truque, Tedeschi and Saye6 and horizontal Reference Hollis, Barr, Doebbeling, Pfaller and Wenzel7,Reference Al-Tawfiq8 transmission; however, these transmission events are usually self-limited and have not been implicated in outbreaks. Exposure to colonized healthcare personnel (HCP) or patients may play a role in precipitating outbreaks. In many hospitals, patients are tested for MRSA nares colonization upon admission; however, HCP generally are not. Reference Boyce, Opal, Potter-Bynoe and Medeiros9Reference Bertin, Vinski and Schmitt11

Here, we report an outbreak investigation of MRSA in a NICU in which HCP were identified as a potential key link in transmission and colonization. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) further identified circulation of a highly virulent outbreak strain for at least 7 months prior to outbreak recognition in the NICU. We highlight an opportunity for prospective WGS in the surveillance setting to aid in the early identification of predominant circulating strains whose virulence may facilitate spread and invasive infection.

Methods

Setting

The University of California San Francisco (UCSF) NICU contains 58 beds and is located within the 183-bed UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital.

Patient consent

This study was approved by the UCSF Institutional Review Board (protocol 17-24056), which permitted WGS analysis of clinical isolates and review of clinical microbiology results as well as analysis of other electronic health record data.

MRSA screening

Patients underwent weekly MRSA surveillance screenings through swabs of bilateral anterior nares, bilateral axillae, umbilical stump, and perirectal areas. HCP underwent a single screening evaluation that included a skin screening questionnaire and performed a self-swab of their bilateral anterior nares, bilateral axilla, and groin.

Microbial culture

Bacterial cultures from patients with bacteremia were inoculated into BACTEC blood culture bottles (blood). Surveillance swabs and wound swabs were streaked onto Remel Spectra MRSA chromagar and incubated at 35ºC for 24 hours (Thermo Scientific Spectra MRSA, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). Plates showing colonies with characteristic color are reported as positive.

Metagenomic sequencing

DNA was extracted from cultured isolates using the Zymo ZR Fungal/Bacterial DNA MiniPrep Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA), 100 ng of DNA from each sample was then sheared with NEB fragmentase and used to construct sequencing libraries using the NEBNext Ultra II Library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA). Adaptor ligated samples underwent 12 cycles of amplification with dual-indexing primers using the NEBNext Ultra II Q5 polymerase. Libraries were then quantified with Qubit (Thermo Scientific)and quality checked with a Bioanalyzer High Sensitivity DNA chip (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). Samples were pooled and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq instrument using a NextSeq 500/500 Mid Output kit v2.5 (300 cycles, Illumina, SanDiego, CO).

Bioinformatic analyses

Raw sequences were analyzed using the SNP Pipeline for Infectious Disease (SPID) software. Reference Kamm12 SPID aligned samples against S. aureus reference genome USA300 TCH1516 using minimap2, followed by samtools to perform an mpileup. Julia code was then run to call a consensus allele at each position, and the SNP instances were computed between every pair of samples. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using randomized axelerated maximum likelihood (RAxML). Reference Stamatakis13 Phylogenetic trees were further visualized with ETE Python API software. Reference Huerta-Cepas, Serra and Bork14

ARGannot software was used to identify antimicrobial resistance genes from quality-filtered raw sequence data for each of the evaluated isolates. Reference Gupta, Padmanabhan and Diene15 Genes with >99% gene coverage were included in the analyses. SCCmec elements were detected using SCCmecFinder. Reference Kaya, Hasman and Larsen16 Multilocus sequence type (MLST) analysis was performed using MLST version 2.0 software. Reference Larsen, Cosentino and Rasmussen17 Detection of S. aureus virulence genes was performed using VirulenceFinder software. Reference Joensen, Scheutz and Lund18

Results

Outbreak description

After 4 infants in the NICU with invasive MRSA infections were identified in an 8-day period, and an investigation was initiated. Retrospective review of microbiology data identified 2 additional positive MRSA cultures from infants in the same geographic zone of the NICU 2 months prior (Supplementary Table 1 online). NICU-wide surveillance screening of all infants and staff identified 16 other cases of MRSA colonization in asymptomatic infants or HCP (Supplementary Fig. 1 online). Review of prior MRSA isolates identified an isolate from an infant with multifocal MRSA infection 7 months prior (Supplementary Table 1 online, ID and 10B). In total, 23 MRSA isolates from 18 patients and 5 HCP were evaluated, and baseline characteristics of each study participant are listed in Supplementary Table 1 (online). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) demonstrated similarities across some isolates, suggestive of an outbreak (Supplementary Fig. 1 online).

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic analysis and phenotypic antibiogram of all sequenced MRSA cases. Isolates are identified by case number followed by H for healthcare personnel, B for bacteremia, S for skin and soft-tissue infection, and C for colonization. (A) Cases associated with clade 1 outbreak strain labeled red, and clade 2 outbreak strain labeled green. Reference S. aureus strains ECT-R2, N315, JH1, 04-02981, and USA 300 strains TCH1516, FPR3757, and ISMMS1, are shown. (B) Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern for all cases sequenced. Susceptibilities to antibiotics are denoted as resistant (R) or intermediate (I). Sequence type (MLST) and staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCC) mec type are shown.

Genomic analyses

All isolates underwent WGS. Assembly by alignment against the chromosomal sequence of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) reference strain S. aureus USA300 TCH1516 confirmed an outbreak composed of 2 genetically distinct clades (Fig. 1A). Pairwise single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) was used as a measure of genetic relatedness between isolates. A cutoff of 23 SNPs was used to define an isolate belonging to the same S. aureus phylogenetic clade. Reference Uhlemann, Dordel and Knox19 Phylogenetic analysis revealed and outbreak of 15 cases comprising 2 distinct phylogenetic clades; clade 1 was composed of 10 infants and 1 HCP (11), and clade 2 was composed of 3 infants and 1 HCP (Fig. 1A). Of the 23 cases, 8 were deemed unrelated to either of the 2 clades based on SNP distance.

Clade 1 exhibited marked genomic similarity between the 11 isolates that make up the clade with a median SNP difference of 3 (range, 0–6). Similarly, 4 isolates comprising clade 2 shared striking genetic similarity with a mean SNP difference of 7 (range 0–23). An isolate belonging to case ID 23EC was ∼800 SNPs away from clade 2, thus was not likely part of a singular transmission event. Interestingly, clade 1 samples were more closely related to ST8 MRSA reference strains USA300 TCH 1516, ISMMS1, and FPR3757, with ∼140 SNP differences. Clade 2 was more closely related to ST5 MRSA reference strain N315 with an ∼700-SNP difference. MRSA reference strain N315 harbored a 17,000-SNP difference from clade 1, and ST8 MRSA reference strains carried an ∼20,000-SNP difference from clade 2.

Confirmation of a highly related cluster of MRSA isolates through WGS prompted further epidemiologic investigation that revealed that 8 of the 11 infants associated outbreak clade 1 had been cared for by HCP 11 (Fig. 2). HCP 11 also cared for patient 10B, who was identified 7 months prior to clade 1, raising the possibility that HCP 11 could be the source of the current outbreak. Almost all patients associated with the outbreak strains were born prematurely and exhibited low birthweight (Supplementary Table 1 online). None of the cases associated with outbreak clade 2 group exhibited active infection.

Fig. 2. Epidemiologic Tracing of MRSA outbreak in the NICU. Index case and 22 other cases associated with an MRSA outbreak. Healthcare personnel (HCP) are indicated by an H. Epidemiologic link to each of 2 HCP is indicated by yellow (11H) and purple (15H), respectively.

In silico MLST typing revealed that outbreak clade 1 was sequence type (ST)-8, and smaller outbreak clade 2 was ST-5 (Fig. 1B). Staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCC) mec typing revealed further similarities among outbreak clades, with clade 1 samples identified to harbor SCCmec IVa, and clade 2 cases identified to harbor SCCmec V (Fig. 1B). Notably, MRSA isolate belonging to case ID 19C shared identical AST, MLST, and SCCmec typing as clade 1 isolates but was ∼270 SNPs away from clade 1, and therefore was distinct from the predominant outbreak clade.

Next, we carried out antimicrobial resistance, virulence, and toxin gene assessments. Cases associated with both outbreak clade 1 and clade 2 exhibited similar antimicrobial-resistance gene profiles (Fig. 3) and concordant phenotypic antimicrobial-resistance profile (Fig. 1B). Interestingly, across nonoutbreak-associated isolates, isolates 17C and 18C, lacked the mecA gene, associated with resistance to β-lactam antibiotics like methicillin and penicillin, despite being phenotypically resistant. Furthermore, 18C also lacked the blaZ gene, associated with resistance to penicillin, despite being phenotypically resistant. Harboring of aminoglycoside resistance genes, sat4A or spc, was not associated with phenotypic antimicrobial resistance.

Fig. 3. Antimicrobial resistance and toxin genes identified by WGS of MRSA isolates. Genes associated with antibiotic resistance and toxins are shown for all cases sequenced. Gene presence is depicted in red and gene absence is depicted in blue. Note. PCN, denotes penicillin; MET, methicillin; ERY, erythromycin; CLIN, clindamycin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; DOX, doxycycline; GEN, gentamycin; and TMP trimethoprim. Genes associated with toxins are shown.

Presence of genes encoding virulence factors or toxins revealed similarities across clade 1 and clade 2 isolates. Interestingly, clade 1 isolates harbored lukS/F, which encodes the cytotoxin Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), and the arginine catab

olic mobile element (ACME), which are associated with severe invasive infection Reference Gillet, Issartel and Vanhems20 or the promotion of persistence and skin colonization, Reference Planet, LaRussa and Dana21 respectively. Clade 1 also harbored superantigen enterotoxin genes seq and sek. Reference Yarwood, McCormick, Paustian, Orwin, Kapur and Schlievert22 In further contrast to clade 1, clade 2 isolates contained the enterotoxin gene clade sei, sem, sen, seo, seg, and seu encoded by superantigen enterotoxin gene clade egc. Reference Kuroda, Ohta and Uchiyama23,Reference Letertre, Perelle, Dilasser and Fach24 All isolates contained the gamma-hemolysin genes hlgA/B/C and the leukocidin genes lukD/E.

Discussion

Real-time deployment of WGS provided high-resolution assessment of an outbreak involving dynamic exchange of genetically distinct MRSA strains between HCPs and patients in a NICU and allowed for strategic implementation of infection control measures. Phylogenetic analysis uncovered 2 outbreak clades in the NICU, both involving HCP who had contact with most, if not all, clade-associated isolates. Clade 1 was associated with invasive and severe infections, while clade 2 was associated with asymptomatic carriage.

Surprisingly, outbreak clade 1 included patient 10B, who was admitted to the NICU 7 months prior to the outbreak and was cared for by HCP 11, were also colonized by clade 1. This raises the possibility that HCP 11 may have played a role in the dissemination of the outbreak clade 1. Not all clade 1 isolates had an epidemiologic link to HCP 11, however, which raises the possibility of unrecognized inter-HCP transmission of the clade 1 strain or, alternatively, the presence of an environmental reservoir.

Assessment of S. aureus virulence factors in the strains from each clade suggested potential molecular determinants driving outbreak emergence. Clade 1 isolates associated with the pandemic clonal lineage USA300, classically regarded as a community-associated (CA-) MRSA strain. Clade 2 isolates most closely associated with strain NS315, a hospital-associated (HA-) MRSA strain. Both outbreak isolates harbored the lukS/F gene that encodes for the cytotoxin Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), a protein first associated with epidemic CA-MRSA strains that are more likely to cause sepsis, necrotizing pneumonia, and necrotizing fasciitis. Reference Gillet, Issartel and Vanhems20 However, unlike clade 2, the clade 1 strain harbored the genomic island referred to as ACME. First described in CA-MRSA strain USA300 in 2006, ACME likely originated from S. epidermidis. Reference Diep, Gill and Chang25 This element is composed of 33 putative genes and 2 operons, arc and opp, which encode genes thought to confer increased survival in the acidic skin environment. Reference Thurlow, Joshi and Clark26 Therefore, ACME-containing S. aureus are poised to execute epidemic, severe infections, possibly explaining why clade 1 isolate was able to circulate in the NICU for >9 months, causing multiple episodes of severe infection along the way. Rapid identification of potentially high-virulence strains highlights an opportunity for preventative surveillance of this high-risk population.

Notably, isolates 16P and 20C also harbored the lukS/F gene and the ACME element. These isolates were not associated with a clade and likely reflect singular acquisitions of highly virulent strains. Clade 1 and clade 2 isolates, on the other hand, had HCP to provide an epidemiologic link that could suggest repeated exposures to the highly virulent isolates that led to the pathologic infection and/or colonization of numerous neonates. This highlights the possibility that silent transmission of antimicrobial resistant organisms is taking place throughout the healthcare system, leaving our most vulnerable patients at greatest risk.

The use of WGS enabled earlier and definitive confirmation that an outbreak was occurring and was seminal to interpreting HCP MRSA surveillance results. Control of both outbreaks was obtained through several measures, including temporary closure of the NICU to new admissions, contact isolation (gown and gloves), positive case cohorting, reinforcement of hand hygiene and PPE practices, extensive environmental disinfection, and patient, parent, and HCP decolonization. All MRSA colonized patients and HCP underwent MRSA decolonization with nasal mupirocin (patients) or nasal povidone iodine (HCP) and topical chlorhexidine if they were eligible. The presence of an outbreak was disclosed to all families in the NICU and families of MRSA positive patients were offered counseling in addition to decolonization with nasal povidone iodine and topical chlorhexidine.

Several studies have suggested a higher prevalence of MRSA colonization in HCP compared to the general population, Reference da Silva, Andrade and Oliveira27,Reference Elie-Turenne, Fernandes and Mediavilla28 thus complicating the interpretation of HCP MRSA surveillance results. WGS permitted identification of HCP colonized with the outbreak clades, and subsequent targeted follow-up and decolonization protocols prior to their return to work. The precision monitoring enabled by WGS changed the ongoing infection control practices employed by our NICU by establishing prospective MRSA surveillance efforts. Ongoing surveillance in the NICU has not identified further clade 1 or 2 associated MRSA isolates 12 months after the outbreak investigation, underscoring the importance and efficacy of decolonization, as has been noted in the case of parental reservoirs. Reference Milstone, Voskertchian and Koontz29

Although the directionality of MRSA transmission cannot be confirmed, both outbreak clades identified were associated with HCP through genetic and epidemiologic linkage. Prior MRSA outbreak studies in the NICU have also identified the potential contribution of the HCP reservoir, Reference Saiman, Cronquist and Wu10,Reference Bertin, Vinski and Schmitt30 but few, if any, have shown prolonged circulation in the hospital environment through silent transmission events that have led to significant patient morbidity, as this work demonstrates. Although economic modeling studies of prospective genomic MRSA surveillance suggests its cost-effectiveness, Reference Dymond, Davies and Mealing31 assessment of HCP colonization through prospective screening may not prove feasible or practical. However, prospective genomic surveillance of high-risk patient populations, such as neonates, may prove beneficial in the early identification of silent and disease-associated outbreaks, as shown in this work.

Prospective genomic surveillance employed in this study was performed at a nonprofit academic research institute affiliated with our institution, in a laboratory that works closely with the hospital and infection prevention group. As the initial outbreak investigation unfolded, WGS was performed in small batches as positive isolated were identified. This resulted in a cost of ∼$500 per sample, which includes cost for WGS from DNA extraction to data and laboratory staff time. Prospective genomic surveillance, however, can allow for larger batching of isolates and use of higher throughput sequencing platforms, thus further reducing costs. Given the wider availability of WGS strategies, and the higher cost-effectiveness of large batch sample processing, we believe that this model can be easily replicated by other hospital systems.

This study had several limitations. Although this work highlights potential that silent transmission of MRSA may occur for months before detection of an outbreak, we were unable to sequence all MRSA isolates detected in the NICU during the 7-month gap between sample the index case and the outbreak, nor isolates prior to the index case. This limited our ability to definitively pinpoint the introduction and complex transmission dynamics of outbreak clade 1. Further, the source of introduction of clade 1 and clade 2 remained elusive, which necessitated consideration of other potential reservoirs in addition to the affected HCPs, such as other HCPs, parents, and the environment. However, environmental samples were unavailable. Nevertheless, the high degree of genetic similarity of clade 1 isolates, evidenced by low SNP difference, suggests that clade 1 isolates were part of a singular transmission event and thus highlights the dangers of silent transmission of highly virulent isolates can pose.

In summary, our results suggest that transmission between HCP and patients contributed to a NICU outbreak involving a uniquely virulent MRSA strain. WGS enabled data-driven implementation of infection prevention strategies that prevented transmission of the outbreak strains and identified a potential source. Prospective genomic epidemiology of hospital-acquired infections may help identify occult transmission events that may precede outbreaks of MRSA and other pathogens. Our findings corroborate prior work demonstrating the utility of WGS in outbreak management. Reference Joensen, Scheutz and Lund18,Reference Snitkin, Zelazny and Thomas32,Reference Crawford, Kamm and Miller33 Given the increasing availability and affordability of WGS, genomic epidemiology of CDC priority pathogens from staff and patients may be a useful measure for identifying early colonization and silent transmission events of virulent strains prior to the emergence of an outbreak.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2022.48

Acknowledgments

Financial support

This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (grant no. K23HL138461-01A1 to C.L.), and the National Institutes of Health (grant no. 5T32AI007641-19 to S.M.).

Conflicts of interest

All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Footnotes

a

Authors of equal contribution.

References

Lake, JG, Weiner, LM, Milstone, AM, Saiman, L, Magill, SS, See, I. Pathogen distribution and antimicrobial resistance among pediatric healthcare-associated infections reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network, 2011–2014. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, J, Jefferies, A, Yoon, E, Lee, S, Shah, P, on behalf of the Canadian Neonatal Network. Risk factors and outcomes of late-onset bacterial sepsis in preterm neonates born at <32 weeks’ gestation. Am J Perinatol 2014;32:675682.Google ScholarPubMed
Song, X, Perencevich, E, Campos, J, Short, BL, Singh, N. Clinical and economic impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization or infection on neonates in intensive care units. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:177182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zervou, FN, Zacharioudakis, IM, Ziakas, PD, Mylonakis, E. MRSA colonization and risk of infection in the neonatal and pediatric ICU: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2014;133:e1015e1023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagenvoort, JHT, Sluijsmans, W, Penders, RJR. Better environmental survival of outbreak vs. sporadic MRSA isolates. J Hosp Infect 2000;45:231234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jimenez-Truque, N, Tedeschi, S, Saye, EJ, et al. Relationship between maternal and neonatal Staphylococcus aureus colonization. Pediatrics 2012;129:e1252e1259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollis, RJ, Barr, JL, Doebbeling, BN, Pfaller, MA, Wenzel, RP. Familial carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and subsequent infection in a premature neonate. Clin Infect Dis 1995;21:328332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Tawfiq, JA. Father-to-infant transmission of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a neonatal intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:636637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, JM, Opal, SM, Potter-Bynoe, G, Medeiros, AA. Spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a hospital after exposure to a healthcare worker with chronic sinusitis. Clin Infect Dis 1993;17:496504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiman, L, Cronquist, A, Wu, F, et al. An outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a neonatal intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:317321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertin, ML, Vinski, J, Schmitt, S, et al. Outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection in a neonatal intensive care unit epidemiologically linked to a healthcare worker with chronic otitis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:581585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamm, J. SPID: SNP pipeline for infectious disease. https://github.com/czbiohub/Spid.jl. Accessed February 28, 2021.Google Scholar
Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014;30:13121313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huerta-Cepas, J, Serra, F, Bork, P. ETE 3: reconstruction, analysis, and visualization of phylogenomic data. Mol Biol Evol 2016;33:16351638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, SK, Padmanabhan, BR, Diene, SM, et al. ARG-ANNOT, a new bioinformatic tool to discover antibiotic resistance genes in bacterial genomes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014;58:212220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaya, H, Hasman, H, Larsen, J, et al. SCCmecFinder, a web-based tool for typing of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec in Staphylococcus aureus using whole-genome sequence data. mSphere 2018;3:e0061217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, MV, Cosentino, S, Rasmussen, S, et al. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome–sequenced bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 2012;50:13551361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joensen, KG, Scheutz, F, Lund, O, et al. Real-time whole-genome sequencing for routine typing, surveillance, and outbreak detection of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli . J Clin Microbiol 2014;52:15011510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uhlemann, A-C, Dordel, J, Knox, JR, et al. Molecular tracing of the emergence, diversification, and transmission of S. aureus sequence type 8 in a New York community. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111:67386743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillet, Y, Issartel, B, Vanhems, P, et al. Association between Staphylococcus aureus strains carrying gene for Panton-Valentine leukocidin and highly lethal necrotising pneumonia in young immunocompetent patients. Lancet 2002;359:753759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Planet, PJ, LaRussa, SJ, Dana, A, et al. Emergence of the epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain USA300 coincides with horizontal transfer of the arginine catabolic mobile element and speG-mediated adaptations for survival on skin. mBio 2013;4:e0088913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yarwood, JM, McCormick, JK, Paustian, ML, Orwin, PM, Kapur, V, Schlievert, PM. Characterization and expression analysis of Staphylococcus aureus pathogenicity island 3: implications for the evolution of staphylococcal pathogenicity islands. J Biol Chem 2002;277:1313813147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuroda, M, Ohta, T, Uchiyama, I, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Lancet 2001;357:12251240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Letertre, C, Perelle, S, Dilasser, F, Fach, P. Identification of a new putative enterotoxin SEU encoded by the egc cluster of Staphylococcus aureus. J Appl Microbiol 2003;95:3843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diep, BA, Gill, SR, Chang, RF, et al. Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Lancet 2006;367:731739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thurlow, LR, Joshi, GS, Clark, JR, et al. Functional modularity of the arginine catabolic mobile element contributes to the success of USA300 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Cell Host Microbe 2013;13:100107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Silva, LSC, Andrade, YMFS, Oliveira, AC, et al. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization among healthcare workers at a tertiary-care hospital in northeastern Brazil. Infect Prev Pract 2020;2:100084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elie-Turenne, M-C, Fernandes, H, Mediavilla, JR, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus colonization among healthcare professionals in an urban teaching hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:574580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milstone, AM, Voskertchian, A, Koontz, DW, et al. Effect of treating parents colonized with Staphylococcus aureus on transmission to neonates in the intensive care unit: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2020;323:319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertin, ML, Vinski, J, Schmitt, S, et al. Outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection in a neonatal intensive care unit epidemiologically linked to a healthcare worker with chronic otitis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:581585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dymond, A, Davies, H, Mealing, S, et al. Genomic surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a mathematical early modeling study of cost-effectiveness. Clin Infect Dis 2020;70:16131619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snitkin, ES, Zelazny, AM, Thomas, PJ, et al. Tracking a hospital outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae with whole-genome sequencing. Sci Transl Med 2012;4:148ra116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crawford, E, Kamm, J, Miller, S, et al. Investigating transfusion-related sepsis using culture-independent metagenomic sequencing. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71:11791185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic analysis and phenotypic antibiogram of all sequenced MRSA cases. Isolates are identified by case number followed by H for healthcare personnel, B for bacteremia, S for skin and soft-tissue infection, and C for colonization. (A) Cases associated with clade 1 outbreak strain labeled red, and clade 2 outbreak strain labeled green. Reference S. aureus strains ECT-R2, N315, JH1, 04-02981, and USA 300 strains TCH1516, FPR3757, and ISMMS1, are shown. (B) Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern for all cases sequenced. Susceptibilities to antibiotics are denoted as resistant (R) or intermediate (I). Sequence type (MLST) and staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCC) mec type are shown.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Epidemiologic Tracing of MRSA outbreak in the NICU. Index case and 22 other cases associated with an MRSA outbreak. Healthcare personnel (HCP) are indicated by an H. Epidemiologic link to each of 2 HCP is indicated by yellow (11H) and purple (15H), respectively.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Antimicrobial resistance and toxin genes identified by WGS of MRSA isolates. Genes associated with antibiotic resistance and toxins are shown for all cases sequenced. Gene presence is depicted in red and gene absence is depicted in blue. Note. PCN, denotes penicillin; MET, methicillin; ERY, erythromycin; CLIN, clindamycin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; DOX, doxycycline; GEN, gentamycin; and TMP trimethoprim. Genes associated with toxins are shown.

Supplementary material: File

Madera et al. supplementary material

Madera et al. supplementary material 1

Download Madera et al. supplementary material(File)
File 462.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Madera et al. supplementary material

Madera et al. supplementary material 2

Download Madera et al. supplementary material(File)
File 3 MB