Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:33:50.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Personal Protective Equipment Management and Policies: European Network for Highly Infectious Diseases Data from 48 Isolation Facilities in 16 European Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Giuseppina De Iaco ,
Vincenzo Puro ,
Francesco Maria Fusco ,
Stefan Schilling ,
Helena C. Maltezou ,
Philippe Brouqui ,
René Gottschalk ,
Barbara Bannister ,
Hans-Reinhard Brodt  and
Heli Siikamaki
...Show all authors
Giuseppina De Iaco*
Affiliation:
National Institute for Infectious Diseases “L. Spallanzani, ” Rome, Italy
Vincenzo Puro
Affiliation:
National Institute for Infectious Diseases “L. Spallanzani, ” Rome, Italy
Francesco Maria Fusco
Affiliation:
National Institute for Infectious Diseases “L. Spallanzani, ” Rome, Italy
Stefan Schilling
Affiliation:
Department for Infectious Diseases, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
Helena C. Maltezou
Affiliation:
Hellenic Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Athens, Greece
Philippe Brouqui
Affiliation:
Research Unit on Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Marseilles, France
René Gottschalk
Affiliation:
Department of Health, Frankfurt, Germany
Barbara Bannister
Affiliation:
Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
Hans-Reinhard Brodt
Affiliation:
Department for Infectious Diseases, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
Heli Siikamaki
Affiliation:
Aurora Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
Christian Perronne
Affiliation:
Raymond Poincaré University Hospital, Paris, France
Arne Broch Brantsæter
Affiliation:
Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Anne Lise Fjellet
Affiliation:
Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Giuseppe Ippolito
Affiliation:
National Institute for Infectious Diseases “L. Spallanzani, ” Rome, Italy
European Network for Highly Infectious Diseases Working Group
Affiliation:
Additional members of the European Network for Highly Infectious Diseases Working Group are listed at the end of the text
*
Via Giulio Petroni 104/M/59, 70124, Bari, Italy ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective.

To collect data about personal protective equipment (PPE) management and to provide indications for improving PPE policies in Europe.

Design.

Descriptive, cross-sectional survey.

Setting and Participants.

Data were collected in 48 isolation facilities in 16 European countries nominated by National Health Authorities for the management of highly infectious diseases (HIDs).

Methods.

Data were collected through standardized checklists at on-site visits during February-November 2009. Indications for adequate PPE policies were developed on the basis of a literature review, partners' expert opinions, and the collected data.

Results.

All facilities have procedures for the selection of PPE in case of HID, and 44 have procedures for the removal of PPE. In 40 facilities, different levels of PPE are used according to a risk assessment process, and in 8 facilities, high-level PPE (eg, positive-pressure complete suits or Trexler units) is always used. A fit test is performed at 25 of the 40 facilities at which it is applicable, a seal check is recommended at 25, and both procedures are used at 17. Strategies for promoting and monitoring the correct use of PPE are available at 42 facilities. In case of a sudden increase in demand, 44 facilities have procedures for rapid supply of PPE, whereas 14 facilities have procedures for decontamination and reuse of some PPE.

Conclusions.

Most isolation facilities devote an acceptable level of attention to PPE selection and removal, strategies for the promotion of the correct use of PPE, and ensuring adequate supplies of PPE. Fit test and seal check procedures are still not widely practiced. Moreover, policies vary widely between and within European countries, and the development of common practice procedures is advisable.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33(10):1008-1016

Type
Original Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 33 , Issue 10 , October 2012 , pp. 1008 - 1016
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Siegel, JD, Rhinehart, E, Jackson, M, Chiarello, L; Health Care Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. 2007 Guideline for isolation precautions: preventing transmission of infectious agents in health care settings. Am J Infect Control 2007; 35(suppl):S65–S164.Google Scholar
2.Bannister, B, Puro, V, Fusco, FM, Heptonstall, J, Ippolito, G; EU-NID Working Group. Framework for the design and operation of high level isolation units: consensus of the European Network of Infectious Diseases. Lancet Infect Dis 2009;9:45–56.Google Scholar
3.Brouqui, P, Puro, V, Fusco, FM, et al.Infection control in the management of highly pathogenic infectious diseases: consensus statement from the European Network for Infectious Diseases. Lancet Infect Dis 2009;9:301–311.Google Scholar
4.Smith, PW, Anderson, AO, Christopher, GW, et al.Designing a biocontainment unit to care for patients with serious communicable diseases: a consensus statement. Biosecur Bioterror 2006;4:351–365.Google Scholar
5.Fusco, FM, Schilling, S, Puro, V, et al.EuroNHID checklists for the assessment of high-level isolation units and referral centres for highly infectious diseases: results from the pilot phase of a European survey. Clin Microbiol Infect 2009;15(8):711–719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. European Network of Infectious Diseases web site, http://www.eunid.eu. Accessed August 8, 2012.Google Scholar
7.Thorne, CD, Khozin, S, McDiarmid, MA. Using the hierarchy of control technologies to improve healthcare facility infection control: lessons from severe acute respiratory syndrome. J Occup Environ Med 2004;46(7):613–622.Google Scholar
8.Fusco, FM, Puro, V, Baka, A, et al.Isolation rooms for highly infectious diseases: an inventory of capabilities in European countries. J Hosp Infect 2009;73(1):15–23.Google Scholar
9.World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Global Influenza Preparedness Plan: The Role of WHO and Recommendations for National Measures before and during Pandemics. Geneva: WHO, 2005. http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/influenza/WHO_CDS_CSR_GIP_2005_5.pdf. Accessed January 3, 2012.Google Scholar
10.Yassi, A, Bryce, E, Moore, D, et al.Protecting the Faces of Health Care Workers: Knowledge Gaps and Research Priorities for Effective Protection against Occupationally Acquired Respiratory Infectious Diseases. Report to Change Foundation. Occupational Health and Safety Agency for Healthcare in BC, 2004. https://circle.ubc.ca/bitstream/handle/2429/849/Protecting_Faces_Final_Report.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed January 3, 2012.Google Scholar
11.Visentin, LM, Bondy, SJ, Schwartz, B, Morrison, LJ. Use of personal protective equipment during infectious disease outbreak and nonoutbreak conditions: a survey of emergency medical technicians. Can J Emerg Med 2009;11(1):44–56.Google Scholar
12.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Interim Guidance on Planning for the Use of Surgical Mash and Respirators in Health Care Settings during an Influenza Pandemic. Atlanta: CDC, 2006. http://www.flu.gov/professional/hospital/maskguidancehc.html. Accessed January 3, 2012Google Scholar
13.US Department of Labor; Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response Guidance for Healthcare Workers and Healthcare Employers. Washington, DC: Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 2009. http://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA_pandemic_health.pdf. Accessed January 3, 2012.Google Scholar
14.National Research Council. Preparing for an Influenza Pandemic: Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Workers. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2008. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11980.html. Accessed January 3, 2012.Google Scholar
15.Lau, JT, Fung, KS, Wong, TW, et al.SARS transmission among hospital workers in Hong Kong. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10(2): 280–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Loeb, M, McGeer, A, Henry, B, et al.SARS among critical care nurses, Toronto. Emerg Infect Dis 2004; 10(2):251–255.Google Scholar
17.Ofner-Agostini, M, Gravel, D, McDonald, LC, et al.Cluster of cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome among Toronto healthcare workers after implementation of infection control precautions: a case series. Infect ContHosp Epidemiol 2006;27(5): 473–478.Google Scholar
18.Daugherty, EL, Perl, TM, Needham, DM, Rubinson, L, Bilderback, A, Rand, CS. The use of personal protective equipment for control of influenza among critical care clinicians: a survey study. Crit Care Med 2009;37(4):1210–1216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Timen, A, Hulscher, ME, Rust, L, et al.Barriers to implementing infection prevention and control guidelines during crises: experiences of health care professionals. Am J Infect Control 2010; 38(9):726–733.Google Scholar
20.Ofner, M, Lem, M, Sarwal, S, Vearncombe, M, Simor, A. Cluster of severe acute respiratory syndrome cases among protected health care workers-Toronto, April 2003. Can Commun Dis Rep 2003;29(11):93–97.Google ScholarPubMed
21.Gershon, RM, Pearson, JM, Westra, LJ. Evaluation tool for the assessment of personal protective respiratory equipment. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:716–718.Google Scholar
22.Radonovich, LJ, Cheng, J, Shenal, BV, Hodgson, M, Bender, BS. Respirator tolerance in health care workers. JAMA 2009;301: 36–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Lee, MC, Takaya, S, Long, R, Joffe, AM. Respirator-fit testing: does it ensure the protection of healthcare workers against respirable particles carrying pathogens? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008; 29:1149–1156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Seto, WH, Tsang, D, Yung, RW, et al.Effectiveness of precautions against droplets and contact in prevention of nosocomial transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Lancet 2003;361:1519–1520.Google Scholar