Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:41:49.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Spanish Hospitals: Results of a Questionnaire Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Carles Codina ,
Antoni Trilla ,
Nuria Riera ,
Montserrat Tuset ,
Xavier Carne ,
Josep Ribas ,
Miguel-Angel Asenjo  and
Hospital Pharmacy Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Study Group
Carles Codina
Affiliation:
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, and theAugust Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
Antoni Trilla*
Affiliation:
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, and theAugust Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
Nuria Riera
Affiliation:
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, and theAugust Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
Montserrat Tuset
Affiliation:
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, and theAugust Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
Xavier Carne
Affiliation:
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, and theAugust Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
Josep Ribas
Affiliation:
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, and theAugust Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
Miguel-Angel Asenjo
Affiliation:
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, and theAugust Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
*
Hospital Epidemiology & Health Services Research Unit, Hospital Clinic— IDIBAPS, Villarroel 170, 08036-Barcelona, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A questionnaire survey was sent to a random sample of the Spanish network of National Health System public acute-care hospitals. Of responding institutions (representing 25% of Spanish hospital beds), nearly 75% had active surveillance programs for the prevention and control of surgical-site infections (SSIs), but only 20% performed postdischarge surveillance. Overall, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) was used in 84% of all surgical procedures. For 77% of procedures, there were written guidelines for the choice and use of PAR Cefazolin was the most commonly used antibiotic (38%). Duration of PAP was shorter than 24 hours in 75% of procedures, and only a single dose was given in 52% of procedures. PAP was commonly used in breast (52%) and inguinal hernia repair (69%) procedures, as well as in laparoscopic abdominal surgery (86%). In summary, the use of PAP in Spanish hospitals is adequate, but improvements can be made in the frequency of prolonged PAP and in the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Surveillance systems for SSI, including postdischarge follow-up, also should be improved.

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 20 , Issue 6 , June 1999 , pp. 436 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wenzel, RP. Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. N Engl J Med 1992;326:337–338.Google Scholar
2. Trilla, A, Mensa, J. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. In: Wenzel, RP, ed. Prevention and Control of Nosocomial Infections.3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1997:867–888.Google Scholar
3. Currier, JS, Campbell, H, Platt, R, Kaiser, AB. Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in Middle Tennessee, 1989-1990. Rev Infect Dis 1991;13(suppl 10):S874–S878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Kappstein, I, Daschner, FD. Use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in selected surgical procedures—results of a survey in 889 surgical departments in German hospitals. Infection 1991;19:391–394.Google Scholar
5. McGowan, JE. Cost and benefit of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis: methods for economic analysis. Rev Infect Dis 1991;13(suppl 10):S879–S889.Google Scholar
6. Vaque, J, Rosselló, J, Trilla, A, Monge, V, Garcia-Caballero, J, Arribas, JL, et al. Nosocomial infections in Spain: results of five nationwide serial prevalence surveys (EPINE Project, 1990 to 1994). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:293–297.Google Scholar
7. Classen, DC, Evans, RS, Pestotnik, SL, Horn, SD, Menlove, RL, Burke, OP. The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection. N Engl J Med 1992;326:281–286.Google Scholar
8. Dellinger, EP, Gross, PA, Barrett, TL, Krause, PJ, Martone, WJ, McGowan, JE Jr, et al. Quality standard for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical procedures. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:182–188.Google Scholar
9. Kreter, B, Woods, M. Antibiotic prophylaxis for cardiothoracic operations. Meta-analysis of thirty years of clinical trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:590–599.Google Scholar
10. Doebbeling, BN, Pfaller, MA, Kuhns, KR, Massanari, RM, Behrendt, DM, Wenzel, RP. Cardiovascular surgery prophylaxis: a randomized, controlled comparison of cefazolin and cefuroxime. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:981–989.Google Scholar
11. Frantzides, CT, Sykes, A. A reevaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 1994;4:375–378.Google Scholar
12. Platt, R, Zucker, JR, Zaleznik, DF, Hopkins, CC, Dellinger, EP, Karchmer, AW, et al. Prophylaxis against wound infection following herniorrhaphy or breast surgery. J Infect Dis 1992;166:556–560.Google Scholar