Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:35:43.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pathogenic Organisms Associated with Artificial Fingernails Worn by Healthcare Workers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Sara A. Hedderwick ,
Shelly A. McNeil ,
Michael J. Lyons  and
Carol A. Kauffman
Sara A. Hedderwick
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Veterans' Affairs Healthcare System, andUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Shelly A. McNeil
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Veterans' Affairs Healthcare System, andUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Michael J. Lyons
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Veterans' Affairs Healthcare System, andUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Carol A. Kauffman*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Veterans' Affairs Healthcare System, andUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
*
Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Rd, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To determine differences in the identity and quantity of microbial flora from healthcare workers (HCWs) wearing artificial nails compared with control HCWs with native nails.

Design:

Two separate studies were undertaken. In study 1, 12 HCWs who did not normally wear artificial nails wore polished artificial nails on their nondominant hand for 15 days. Identity and quantity of microflora were compared between the artificial nails and the polished native nails of the other hand. In study 2, the microbial flora of the nails of 30 HCWs who wore permanent acrylic artificial nails were compared with that of control HCWs who had native nails. In both studies, nail surfaces were swabbed and subungual debris was collected to obtain material for culture. Staphylococcus aureus, gram-negative bacilli, enterococci, and yeasts were considered to be potential pathogens. All organisms were identified and quantified.

Results:

In study 1, potential pathogens were isolated from more samples obtained from artificial nails than native nails (92% vs 62%; P<.001). Colonization of artificial nails increased over time; by day 15, 71% of cultures yielded a pathogen compared with 21% on day 1 (P=.004). A significantly greater quantity of organisms (expressed as mean log10 colony-forming units ± standard deviation) was isolated from the subungual area than the nail surface; this was noted for both artificial (5.0±1.4 vs 4.1 ±1.0; P<.001) and native nails (4.9±1.3 vs 3.7±0.8; P<.001). More organisms were found on the surface of artificial nails than native nails (P=.008), but there were no differences noted in the quantities of organisms isolated from the subungual areas. In study 2, HCWs wearing artificial nails were more likely to have a pathogen isolated than controls (87% vs 43%; P=.001). More HCWs with artificial nails had gram-negative bacilli (47% vs 17%; P=.03) and yeasts (50% vs 13%; P=.006) than control HCWs. However, the quantities of organisms isolated from HCWs wearing artificial nails and controls did not differ.

Conclusions:

Artificial fingernails were more likely to harbor pathogens, especially gram-negative bacilli and yeasts, than native nails. The longer artificial nails were worn, the more likely that a pathogen was isolated. Current recommendations restricting artificial fingernails in certain healthcare settings appear justified.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 21 , Issue 8 , August 2000 , pp. 505 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Larson, EL. Skin hygiene and infection prevention: more of the same or different approaches? Clin Infect Dis 1999;29:1281–1286.Google Scholar
2.Hahn, JB. The source of the “resident” flora. The Hand 1973;5:247–252.Google Scholar
3.Rayan, GM, Flournoy, DJ. Microbiologic flora of human fingernails. J Hand Surg 1987;12A:605–607.Google Scholar
4.McGinley, KJ, Larson, EL, Leyden, JJ. Composition and density of microflora in the subungual space of the hand. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:950–953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Wynd, CA, Samstag, DE, Lapp, AM. Bacterial carriage on the fingernails of OR nurses. AORN J 1994;60:796–805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Gross, A, Cutright, DE, D'Alessandro, SM. Effect of surgical scrub on microbial population under the fingernails. Am J Surg 1979;138:463–467.Google Scholar
7.Baumgartner, CA, Maragos, CS, Walz, J, Larson, E. Effects of nail polish on microbial growth of fingernails: dispelling sacred cows. AORN J 1993;58:84–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Pottinger, J, Burns, S, Manske, C. Bacterial carriage by artificial versus natural nails. Am J Infect Control 1989;17:340–344.Google Scholar
9.Rubin, DM. Prosthetic fingernails in the OR. A research study. AORN J 1988;47:944–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Passaro, DJ, Waring, L, Armstrong, R, Bolding, F, Bouvier, B, Rosenberg, J, et al. Postoperative Serratia marcescens wound infections traced to an out-of-hospital source. J Infect Dis 1997;175:992–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Moolenaar, RL, Crutcher, JM, San Joaquin, VH, Sewell, LV, Hutwanger, LC, Carson, LA, et al. A prolonged outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a neonatal intensive care unit: did staff fingernails play a role in disease transmission? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:80–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Jakob, KM, Foca, M, Whittier, S, Della-Latta, R, Saiman, L. Risk factors for Pseudomonas aeruginosa hand carriage in healthcare workers (HCW) during an investigation of increased infection in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America; November 18-21, 1999; Philadelphia, PA Abstract 21.Google Scholar
13.Association of Operating Room Nurses. Recommended practices: surgical hand scrubs. AORN J 1990;52:830–836.Google Scholar
14.Schaberg, DR, Weinstein, RA, Stamm, WE. Epidemics of nosocomial urinary tract infections caused by multiply resistant gram-negative bacilli: epidemiology and control. J Infect Dis 1976;133:363–366.Google Scholar
15.French, GL, Casewell, MN, Roncorone, AJ, Knight, S, Phillips, I. A hospital outbreak of antibiotic resistant Acinetobacter anitratus: epidemiology and control. J Hosp Infect 1980;1:125–131.Google Scholar
16.Larson, EL. Persistent carriage of gram-negative bacteria on hands. Am J Infect Control 1981;9:112–119.Google Scholar
17.Larson, E. Handwashing: it's essential—even when you use gloves. Am J Nurs 1989;89:934–937.Google Scholar