Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:41:19.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microbial Aerosol Contamination of Dental Healthcare Workers' Faces and Other Surfaces in Dental Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Emilia Prospero ,
Sandra Savini  and
Isidoro Annino
Emilia Prospero*
Affiliation:
University of Ancona, Ancona, Italy
Sandra Savini
Affiliation:
University of Ancona, Ancona, Italy
Isidoro Annino
Affiliation:
University of Ancona, Ancona, Italy
*
Università di Ancona, Istituto di Malattie Infettive e Medicina Pubblica, Cattedra di Igiene, Piazza Roma, 2, 60100 Ancona, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to focus attention on the need to adopt infection control procedures in dentistry. The quantitative and qualitative bacterial contamination of dental healthcare workers' faces and other surfaces in dental practice was determined. Oral fluids become aerosolized during dentistry and oral microbes have been used as the markers of their spread that may carry blood-borne pathogens.

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , February 2003 , pp. 139 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommended infection-control practices for dentistry, 1993. MMWR 1993;42(RR-8):1–20.Google Scholar
2.Legnani, P, Checci, L, Pelliccioni, GA, D'Achille, C. Atmospheric contamination during dental procedures. Quintessence International 1994;25:435–439.Google Scholar
3.Bennett, AM, Fulford, MR, Walker, JT, Bradshaw, DJ, Martin, MV, Marsh, PD. Microbial aerosols in general dental practice. British Dental Journal 2000;189:664–667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Monarca, S, Galli, MG, Tarsitani, G. Valutazione dei problemi igienico-sanitari legati all'assistenza odontoiatrica pubblica: indagine in 14 città italiane. Annali Igiene 2002;14:15–25.Google Scholar
5.Cellini, L, Di Campii, E, Di Candia, M, Chiavaroli, G. Quantitative microbial monitoring in a dental office. Public Health 2001;115:301–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.McCarthy, GM, MacDonald, JK. The infection control practice of general dental practitioners. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:699–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Shulman, ER, Brehm, WT. Dental clinical attire and infection-control procedures: patients' attitudes. Journal of the American Dental Association 2001;132:508–516.Google Scholar
8.Cochran, MA, Miller, CH, Sheldrake, MA. The efficacy of the rubber dam as a barrier to the spread of micro-organisms during dental treatment. Journal of the American Dental Association 1989;119:141–144.Google Scholar
9.Marshall, KF. Microbial aerosol. British Dental Journal 2001;190:226–227.Google Scholar
10.Emery, C. Microbial aerosol. British Dental Journal 2001;191:63.Google Scholar
11.McCarthy, GM, Koval, JJ, MacDonald, JK. Compliance with recommended infection control procedures among Canadian dentists: results of a national survey. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:377–384.Google Scholar