Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:35:24.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Knowledge of Standard and Isolation Precautions in a Large Teaching Hospital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Hugo Sax ,
Thomas Perneger ,
Stéphane Hugonnet ,
Pascale Herrault ,
Marie-Noëlle Chraïti  and
Didier Pittet
Hugo Sax
Affiliation:
Infection Control Program, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Thomas Perneger
Affiliation:
Quality of Care Unit, University of Geneva Hospitals, and the Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Stéphane Hugonnet
Affiliation:
Infection Control Program, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Pascale Herrault
Affiliation:
Infection Control Program, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Marie-Noëlle Chraïti
Affiliation:
Infection Control Program, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Didier Pittet*
Affiliation:
Infection Control Program, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
*
Infection Control Program, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Geneva Hospitals, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To assess the level of knowledge regarding and attitudes toward standard and isolation precautions among healthcare workers in a hospital.

Method:

A confidential, self-administered questionnaire survey was conducted in a random sample of 1,500 nurses and 500 physicians in a large teaching hospital.

Results:

A total of 1,241 questionnaires were returned (response rate, 62%). The median age of respondents was 39 years; 71.9% were women and 21.2% had senior staff status. One-fourth had previously participated in specific training regarding transmission precautions for pathogens conducted by the infection control team. More than half (55.9%) gave correct answers to 10 or more of the 13 knowledge-type questions. The following reasons for noncompliance with guidelines were judged as “very important”: lack of knowledge (47%); lack of time (42%); forget-Mness (39%); and lack of means (28%). For physicians and healthcare workers in a senior position, lack of time and lack of means were significantly less important (P < .0005). On multivariate linear regression, knowledge was independently associated with exposure to training sessions (coefficient, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.08 to 0.57; P = .009) and less professional experience (coefficient per increasing professional experience, -0.024; 95% confidence interval, -0.035 to -0.012; P < .0005).

Conclusions:

Despite a training effort targeting opinion leaders, knowledge of transmission precautions for pathogens remained insufficient. Nevertheless, specific training proved to be the major determinant of “good knowledge”.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , March 2005 , pp. 298 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Public health focus: surveillance, prevention, and control of nosocomial infections. MMWR 1999;41:783–787.Google Scholar
2.Garner, JS. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals: the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:53–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Garner, JS, Simmons, BP. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. Infect Control 1983;4(4 suppl):245–325.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Widmer, AF, Sax, H, Pittet, D. Infection control and hospital epidemiology outside the United States. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:17–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Brennan, PJ, Abrutyn, E. Developing policies and guidelines. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995;16:512–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for prevention of HIV transmission in health-care settings. MMWR 1987; 36(suppl 2):1S–18S.Google Scholar
7.Boyce, JM, Pittet, D. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. MMWR 2002;51(RR-16):1–45.Google ScholarPubMed
8.Trim, JC, Adams, D, Elliott, TS. Healthcare workers' knowledge of inoculation injuries and glove use. British Journal of Nursing 2003;12:215–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Stein, AD, Makarawo, TP, Ahmad, MF. A survey of doctors' and nurses' knowledge, attitudes and compliance with infection control guidelines in Birmingham teaching hospitals. J Hosp Infect 2003;54:68–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Chan, R, Molassiotis, A, Chan, E, et al.Nurses' knowledge of and compliance with universal precautions in an acute care hospital. Int J Nurs Stud 2002;39:157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Larson, EL, Early, E, Cloonan, P, Sugrue, S, Parides, M. An organizational climate intervention associated with increased handwashing and decreased nosocomial infections. Behav Med 2000;26:14–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Pittet, D, Hugonnet, S, Harbarth, S, et al.Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene: infection control programme. Lancet 2000;356:1307–1312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Williams, CO, Campbell, S, Henry, K, Collier, P. Variables influencing worker compliance with universal precautions in the emergency department. Am J Infect Control 1994;22:138–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Pittet, D. The Lowbury Lecture: behaviour in infection control. J Hosp Infect 2004;25:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Calabro, K, Weltge, A, Parnell, S, Kouzekanani, K, Ramirez, E. Intervention for medical students: effective infection control. Am J Infect Control 1998;26:431–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Diekema, DJ, Schuldt, SS, Albanese, MA, Doebbeling, BN. Universal precautions training of preclinical students: impact on knowledge, attitudes, and compliance. Prev Med 1995;24:580–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Lankford, MG, Zembower, TR, Trick, WE, et al.Influence of role models and hospital design on hand hygiene of healthcare workers. Emerg Infect Dis 2003;9:217–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Pittet, D, Simon, A, Hugonnet, S, Pessoa-Silva, CL, Sauvan, V, Perneger, TV. Hand hygiene among physicians: performance, beliefs, and perceptions. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Alvaran, MS, Butz, A, Larson, E. Opinions, knowledge, and self-reported practices related to infection control among nursing personnel in long-term care settings. Am J Infect Control 1994;22:367–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Madan, AK, Raafat, A, Hunt, JP, et al.Barrier precautions in trauma: is knowledge enough? J Trauma 2002;52:540–543.Google Scholar