Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-20T09:15:10.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Klebsiella pneumoniae Pseudobacteremia Due to Cross-Contamination of A Radiometric Blood Culture Analyzer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Gary P. Greenhood ,
Anita K. Highsmith ,
James R. Allen ,
William A. Causey ,
C. Michael West  and
Richard E. Dixon
Gary P. Greenhood
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
Anita K. Highsmith
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
James R. Allen*
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
William A. Causey
Affiliation:
Infections Surveillance Program, University of Chicago Hospitals and Clinics, Chicago, Illinois
C. Michael West
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
Richard E. Dixon
Affiliation:
Hospital Infections Program, Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Hospital Infections Program, CID, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Blood isolates from 13 patients in one hospital were positive for Klebsiella pneumoniae over a two-week period. Vials of potassium chloride used in intravenous fluid admixture initially were suspected of being contaminated and thus causing the problem. However, a comparison of patients who had blood cultures positive for K. pneumoniae with control patients who had blood cultures negative for this organism during the same period identified no common features that would explain the increase in K. pneumoniae blood isolates. Careful evaluation of laboratory data suggested that six of the 13 culture-positive patients had probable pseudobacteremia, an explanation that would account for the increase in isolates above the endemic level of true K. pneumoniae bacteremia in the hospital. Epidemiologic data suggested that cross-contamination of adjacent and non-adjacent blood culture vials on the radiometric blood culture analyzer was the cause of pseudobacteremia; K. pneumoniae serotyping data supported this hypothesis. A mocktrial using the analyzer demonstrated that cross-contamination of non-adjacent vials by the sampling needles could occur. Changing the sampling needles of the analyzer daily, in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations, prevented further episodes of pseudobacteremia from the analyzer. [Infect Control 1981; 2(6):460-465.]

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 2 , Issue 6 , December 1981 , pp. 460 - 465
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.DuPont, HL, Spink, WW. Infections due to gram-negative organisms: An analysis of 860 patients with bacteremia at the University of Minnesota Medical Center, 1958-66. Medicine 1969; 48:307–332.Google Scholar
2.MacGregor, RR, Beaty, HN. Evaluation of positive blood cultures: Guidelines for early differentiation of contaminated from valid positive cultures. Arch Intern Med 1972; 130:84–87.Google Scholar
3.Waters, JR, Zwarun, AA. Results of an automated radiometric sterility test as applied to clinical blood cultures. In: Development in Industrial Microbiology. Washington DC, American Institute of Biological Sciences, 1973, pp 80–89.Google Scholar
4.Edwards, PR, Ewing, WH. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae. 3rd ed. Minneapolis, Burgall Publishing Co, 1972.Google Scholar
5.Bauer, AW, Kirby, WM, Sherris, JCet al.Antibiotic susceptibility testing by standardized single disc method. Am J Clin Pathol 1966; 45:493–496.Google Scholar
6.Weinstein, RA, Stamm, WE. Pseudoepidemics in hospital. Lancet 1977; 2:862–864.Google Scholar
7.Snydman, DR, Maloy, MF, Brock, SMet al.Pseudobacteremia: False-positive blood cultures from mist tent contamination. Am J Epidemiol 1977; 106:154–159.Google Scholar
8.Berkelman, RL, Lewin, S, Allen, JRet al.Pseudobacteremia attributed to contamination of povidone-iodine with Pseudomonas cepacia. Ann Intern Med 1981.Google Scholar
9.DuClos, TW, Hodges, GR, Killian, JE. Bacterial contamination of blood-drawing equipment: A cause of false positive blood cultures. Am J Med Sci 1973; 266:459–463.Google Scholar
10.Hoffman, PC, Arnow, PM, Goldmann, DAet al.False-positive blood cultures. Association with nonsterile blood collection tubes. JAMA 1976; 236:2073–2075.Google Scholar
11.Semel, JD, Trenholme, GM, Harris, AAet al.Pseudomonas maltophilia pseudosepticemia. Am J Med 1979; 64:403–406.Google Scholar
12.Centers for Disease Control. Nosocomial pseudobacteremia. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Rep 1980; 29:243–249.Google Scholar
13.Faris, HM, Sparling, FF. Mima polymorpha bacteremia: False-positive cultures due to contaminated penicillinase. JAMA 1972; 219:76–77.Google Scholar
14.Norden, CW. Pseudosepticemia. Ann Intern Med 1969; 71:789–790.Google Scholar
15.Kaslow, RA, Mackel, DC, Mallison, GF. Nosocomial pseudobacteremia: Positive blood cultures due to contaminated benzalkonium antiseptic. JAMA 1976; 236:2407–2409.Google Scholar
16.Noble, RC, Reeves, SA. Bacillus species Pseudosepsis caused by contaminated commercial blood culture media. JAMA 1974; 230:1002–1004.Google Scholar
17.Lynch, JM, Anderson, A, Camacho, FRet al.Pseudobacteremia caused by Clostridium sordellii. Arch Intern Med 1980; 140:65–68.Google Scholar
18.Centers for Disease Control. Pseudobacteremia due to Staphylococcus aureus. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Rep 1979; 28:82–83.Google Scholar
19.Washington, JA, Yu, PKW. Radiometric method for detection of bacteremia. Appl Microbiol 1971; 22:100.Google Scholar