Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T07:21:55.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Rings on the Efficacy of Hand Sanitization and Residual Bacterial Contamination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Montri D. Wongworawat  and
Sidney G. Jones
Montri D. Wongworawat*
Affiliation:
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California
Sidney G. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California
*
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University, 11406 Loma Linda Drive, Suite 218, Loma Linda, CA 92354 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background.

Previous studies, conducted before widespread use of scrubless, alcohol-based hand sanitizers, demonstrated increased residual bacterial counts after hand hygiene on hands with jewelry.

Objective.

To compare the impact of finger rings on the effectiveness of scrubless and water-aided alcohol-based hand sanitization methods with that of povidone-iodine scrub.

Design.

Randomized, controlled study.

Setting.

University hospital.

Participants.

Sixty volunteer subjects from a pool of perioperative staff and medical students.

Intervention.

After recruitment, participants wore a ring on one hand and no ring on the other hand. They were randomly assigned to perform hand hygiene with a povidone-iodine scrub, an alcohol wash, or a waterless alcohol-chlorhexidine lotion (n = 20 subjects per method). After subjects completed hand hygiene, gloves were placed on their hands by means of sterile methods, and a “glove juice” technique was used to obtain samples for culture. The number of colony-forming units in each culture was counted, and the data were compared.

Results.

There was no significant difference in the number of bacteria between hands with and hands without rings for the groups that used alcohol wash or alcohol-chlorhexidine lotion. However, for the povidone-iodine group, the number of bacteria on hands with rings was greater than the number on hands without rings (P < .05). The hands of participants who used waterless alcohol-chlorhexidine had the lowest bacterial count, regardless of the presence of rings (P < .01).

Conclusions.

The presence of rings does not negatively impact the effectiveness of alcohol-based hand sanitizers. Use of waterless alcohol-chlorhexidine lotion resulted in the lowest bacterial count.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , March 2007 , pp. 351 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Trick, W, Vernon, M, Hayes, R, et al. Impact of ring wearing on hand contamination and comparison of hand hygiene agents in a hospital. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:1383–1390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Montville, R, Chen, Y, Schaffner, DW. Risk assessment of hand washing efficacy using literature and experimental data. Int J Food Microbiol 2002;73:305–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Bellamy, K, Alcock, R, Babb, JR, et al. A test for assessment of ‘hygienic' hand disinfection using rotavirus. J Hosp Infect 1993;24:201–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Davies, JG, Babb, JR, Bradley, CR, et al. Preliminary study of test methods to assess the virucidal activity of skin disinfectants using poliovirus and bacteriophages. J Hosp Infect 1993;25:125–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Babb, JR, Davies, JG, Ayliffe, GA. A test procedure for evaluating surgical hand disinfection. J Hosp Infect 1991;18(suppl B):41–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Larson, EL, Butz, AM, Gullette, DL, et al. Alcohol for surgical scrubbing? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1990;11:139–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Pereira, LJ, Lee, GM, Wade, KJ. An evaluation of five protocols for surgical handwashing in relation to skin condition and microbial counts. J Hosp Infect 1997;36:49–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Larson, EL, Aiello, AE, Heilman, JM, et al. Comparison of different regimens for surgical hand preparation. AORN J 2001;73:412–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed