Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:43:28.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Infections and Infection Risks in Home Care Settings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Mary C. White
Mary C. White*
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, Community and Administrative Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, California
*
DMHCAN Box 0608, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0608
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

To describe the characteristics of home healthcare clients with respect to infection risks and the presence of infections.

Design:

Descriptive survey of client charts using a point prevalence design.

Setting:

A private San Francisco, California, Bay area home care agency.

Participants:

A random sample of 175 clients (28%) was taken from the active client list for a single day; demographic data and clinical data from the last visit prior to the selection day were collected from each chart.

Results:

The clients were predominantly elderly (mean= 68.6) with an average of 3.6 comorbid conditions; 12% had an invasive device. Over 20% had an infection on the day surveyed. Five percent had an infection that occurred during home care delivery

Conclusions:

A substantial proportion of home health clients have infections, and they represent persons with a number of the risks associated with infections. Guidelines for defining and monitoring infections in home care need to be developed. Hospital-based surveillance methods are not altogether appropriate in this setting; redesigning methods such as targeted surveillance, monitoring rehospitalization, or immunization practices are discussed as potential ways to measure quality of care in the home setting.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 13 , Issue 9 , September 1992 , pp. 535 - 539
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kavesh, WN. Home care: process, outcome, cost. Annual Rev Gerontol Geriatr. 1986;6:135–195.Google ScholarPubMed
2. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. Home care in the 1990s. JAMA. 1990;263:1241–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Woodin, KA, Davis, CJ. The economic and psychosocial impact of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy in pediatrics. Sem Ped Infect Dis. 1990;1:419–428.Google Scholar
4. Streckfuss, BLW, Bergers, RM. Infection control for caregivers of AIDS patients (domiciliary). NZTA. July-August, 1987:282–284.Google Scholar
5. McGeer, A, Campbell, B, Emori, TG, et al. Definitions of infection for surveillance in long-term care facilities. Am J Infect Control. 1991;19:1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death. Vol. 1, ed 9. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Association; 1977.Google Scholar
7. Pasquale, DK. Characteristics of Medicareeligible home care clients. Pub Health Nurs. 1987;5:129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Standards for the Accreditation of Home Care. Chicago, Ill: Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations; 1988.Google Scholar
9. Rhame, FS. Surveillance objectives: descriptive epidemiology. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1987;8:454–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Update on adult immunization: recommendations of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee (ACIP). MMWR. 1991;40(RR-12):1–93.Google Scholar
11. Simmons, B, Truster, M, Roccaforte, J, et al. Infection control for home health. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1990;11:362–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed