Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:58:07.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In vitro assessment of effect of initial specimen diversion device on detection of central venous catheter contamination or colonization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2024

Mark E. Rupp*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
Paul D. Fey
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
Elizabeth Lyden
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
Luke Handke
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
*
Corresponding author: Mark E. Rupp; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The role of initial specimen diversion devices (ISDDs) in preventing contamination of central venous catheter (CVC) blood cultures is undefined. A model to simulate CVC colonization and contamination compared standard cultures with ISDD technique. ISDD detected 100% of colonized CVCs while decreasing false-positive cultures from 36% to 16%.

Type
Concise Communication
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Introduction

Blood cultures are commonly used and critically important. Reference Doern, Carroll and Diekema1 1%–5% of blood cultures are contaminated by skin-residing commensal organisms, resulting in adverse outcomes. Reference Doern, Carroll and Diekema1Reference Alahmadi, Aldeyab and McElnay3

Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are common and result in morbidity and excess cost. Reference Doern, Carroll and Diekema1Reference Ziegler, Pellegrini and Safdar4 Diagnosis of CRBSI often requires cultures from the vascular catheter and peripheral blood. Reference O’Grady, Alexander and Alhazzani5 Cultures obtained from vascular catheters are more likely than peripheral cultures to be contaminated, Reference Sherertz, Karchmer, Palavecino and Bischoff6 often leading to unnecessary catheter removal.

Initial specimen diversion devices (ISDDs) cost-efficiently decrease blood culture contamination. Reference Rupp, Cavalieri, Marolf and Lyden7 It is unknown whether ISDD technology is helpful in decreasing contamination of central venous catheter (CVC)-drawn cultures. We developed in vitro models of CVC contamination and colonization to characterize the utility of the ISDD in detecting CVC colonization while minimizing culture contamination.

Methods: (Also see Supplemental Materials)

CVC colonization

CVC (Arrow triple-lumen, Teleflex) colonization was simulated by filling the lumen with Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB) containing 10 colony-forming units (CFUs) of S. epidermidis 1457/pCM29 (ica-positive, biofilm-producing, expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP)). The CVCs, maintained in sterile catheter shields (Cath–Gard, Teleflex), were incubated overnight at 37°C. 50 CVCs were sampled by standard or ISDD method.

Catheter contamination

Catheter connector (MaxZero™, Becton Dickinson) contamination was simulated by inoculation of 10 CFUs of S. epidermidis in 50 µL of TSB onto the diaphragm of the CVC connector and allowing it to air dry. Fifty CVCs were sampled by standard or ISDD method.

Blood culture

Blood cultures were simulated by drawing sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) through the CVC. In the standard method, the ISDD (SteriPath Blood Collection System, Magnolia Medical Technologies) was pre-engaged (diversion chamber closed) and then connected to the CVC. For the ISDD method, the ISDD was engaged to divert the initial 1.5–2 mL of PBS. For both methods, a Vacutainer (Becton Dickinson) was used to collect 1 mL of PBS for quantitative culture. Two 10 mL samples were then collected into BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F blood bottles (Becton Dickinson). The bacterial titer in CFU/mL was determined. Bottles were incubated in a BACTEC FX instrument (Becton Dickinson) and monitored for 5 days. Time-to-positivity (TTP) was recorded.

Dose-ranging preliminary study

To establish inoculum levels to simulate CVC connector contamination and catheter colonization, a dose-ranging study was conducted using 3 CVCs per inoculum group: 101 CFU–103 CFU in colonization model; 101 CFU–104 CFU in contamination model.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

(See supplemental materials).

Statistical analysis

Fisher’s exact test compared the proportion of positive cultures between the ISDD and standard methods. Wilcoxon rank sum test compared the median CFU/mL between the blood culture methods.

Results

Dose-ranging study

Colonization: All inoculum levels (101–103 CFU) resulted in 100% blood culture positivity. Table 1 details quantitative culture and TTP data. For the full study, the lowest inoculum (101 CFU) that reliably resulted in colonized CVCs was used.

Table 1. Dose-ranging study. Quantitative culture results and blood culture time-to-positivity for colonization model and contamination model

Note. CFU, colony-forming units; ISDD, initial specimen diversion device; TTP, time-to-positivity.

Contamination: At the 101 level, a differentiation was evident between ISDD and standard techniques. At larger inoculum (102–104 CFU), both the ISDD and standard cultures were positive. For the full study, the 101 CFU level was chosen.

Full study

Catheter colonization: All simulated blood cultures yielded bacterial growth in the standard and ISDD arms. There was a lower number of bacteria in the ISDD cultures versus standard cultures (1.17 × 105 CFU/mL ± 1.85 × 105 (SD) vs 3.96 × 106 CFU/mL ± 4.97 × 106, respectively) (P < 0.0001). There was a significant difference in TTP for the initial bottle (12.51 h ± 1.61 h vs 10.02 h ± 1.03 h) (P < 0.0001) and the second bottle (14.14 h ± 1.81 h vs. 12.92 h ± 1.18 h) (P = 0.017) for ISDD and standard cultures, respectively.

Connector contamination: 4 of 25 (16%) ISDD cultures and 9 of 25 (36%) standard cultures yielded bacteria (P = 0.196). 0 of 25 quantitative ISDD cultures recovered bacteria, and 2 of 25 standard cultures yielded growth. There was not a significant difference in TTP between ISDD and standard cultures. First bottle positivity was 23.76 h ±1.83 h versus 22.94 h ±1.2 h (P = 0.247) for the ISDD and standard cultures, respectively. Second bottle positivity was 28.4 h (only 1 positive bottle) versus 22.56 h ±1.26 h (P = 0.54) for the ISDD and standard cultures, respectively.

Inadvertent contamination was excluded with all arising colonies demonstrating GFP production.

Four colonized CVCs and two contaminated connectors were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). All colonized catheters exhibited widespread adherent staphylococci (Figure 1A), while only rare bacteria were visualized on the contaminated connectors (Figure 1B).

Figure 1. (A) Representative scanning electron micrograph of colonized catheter demonstrating numerous intralumenal adherent staphylococci. (B) Representative scanning electron micrograph of contaminated diaphragmatic surface of CVC connector valve demonstrating rare adherent staphylococci.

Discussion

ISDD prevents contamination of peripheral blood cultures. Reference Rupp, Cavalieri, Marolf and Lyden7 CVC blood cultures are more likely to be contaminated than peripheral cultures. Reference Sherertz, Karchmer, Palavecino and Bischoff6

Whether ISDD limits contamination of CVC cultures is unknown. Because the ISDD diverts the initial portion of the specimen (excluding blood with the heaviest burden of bacteria), the ISDD could result in exclusion of colonized catheters. Ideally, use of the ISDD would not decrease sensitivity while improving specificity (prevention of contamination due to bacteria on the connector). This in vitro study, modeling CVC intraluminal colonization and connector contamination, suggests possible clinical utility for ISDD CVC cultures.

In the colonization study, standard cultures and ISDD cultures detected 100% of colonized CVCs. Because the ISDD excludes the initial more heavily colonized portion, there was a longer TTP for ISDD cultures compared to standard cultures (2.49 hours longer incubation for first bottle, 1.22 hours longer for second bottle). This is supported by the greater number of bacteria present in quantitative cultures (1.17 × 105 CFU/mL (ISDD) vs 3.96 × 106 CFU/mL (standard)). The longer TTP noted with ISDD cultures would generally not be regarded as clinically significant. Thus, the ISDD method detects colonized CVCs without loss of sensitivity.

The utility of the ISDD technology for CVC cultures comes with improved specificity. The contamination study, which modeled low-level contamination of CVC connectors, demonstrated a decrease in blood culture contamination from 36% to 16% (56% relative risk reduction). This observation did not reach the level of statistical significance (P = 0.196) most likely due to study size/statistical power. The low inoculum level for the contamination model is supported by clinical studies examining connector contamination in which most contaminated connectors exhibited only a few CFU. Reference Hankins, Majorant and Rupp10 At our center, despite robust infection prevention and stewardship programs, blood culture contamination results in an extra day of hospitalization and antibiotic treatment. Reference Liaquat, Baccaglini, Haynatzki, Medcalf and Rupp2 Additional adverse effects include unnecessary laboratory studies, unneeded antibiotics, diagnostic confusion, and unnecessary removal of CVCs. Reference Alahmadi, Aldeyab and McElnay3,Reference Bates, Goldman and Lee8,Reference Souvenir, Anderson and Palpant9

The CVC colonization model resulted in a heavily colonized intraluminal surface from a small inoculum (10 CFU) after a short incubation time (24 hours) in the presence of a rich nutritional environment. This is analogous to a CVC used to instill total parenteral nutrition, lipids, or blood products. The contamination model mimics the small inoculum associated with contamination of the catheter hub or connector and less frequently resulted in positive cultures (36%) and rarely was detected by quantitative culture (8%). The dose-ranging study indicated that at higher levels of connector contamination, the discriminatory effect of the ISDD was lost. However, we believe low-level inoculum is a more accurate reflection of clinical conditions. Reference Hankins, Majorant and Rupp10

In this CVC contamination/colonization model, the ISDD resulted in 100% sensitivity and improved specificity and justifies a prospective clinical trial.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.220.

Data availability statement

All raw data are available upon request.

Acknowledgments

None.

Author contributions

MER, LH, and PDF contributed to the conception and design of the study. MER, LH, and PDF contributed to acquisition of data, and all authors contributed to analysis and interpretation of data. EL performed statistical analysis. MER, LH, and PDF contributed to drafting the article. All authors revised the manuscript, provided intellectual input, and approved the submitted version.

Financial support

This study was funded by a contract from Magnolia Medical Technologies, Inc., to the University of Nebraska Medical Center. The sponsor approved the final protocol but did not have a role in data acquisition, data analysis, or manuscript preparation.

Competing interests

MER has received past financial support from Magnolia Medical Technology, Inc., in the form of contracts between the sponsor and the University of Nebraska Medical Center for a prior prospective clinical trial and retrospective cohort analysis. In addition, MER has served as a consultant for Teleflex, 3M, and Citius Pharmaceuticals. All other authors report no potential conflicts of interest.

The authors thank Nicholas Conoan of the Electron Microscopy Core Facility (EMCF) at the University of Nebraska Medical Center for technical assistance. The EMCF is supported by state funds from the Nebraska Research Initiative (NRI) and the University of Nebraska Foundation and institutionally by the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research.

References

Doern, GV, Carroll, KC, Diekema, DJ, et al. Practical guidance for clinical microbiology laboratories: a comprehensive update on the problem of blood culture contamination and a discussion of methods for addressing the problem. Clin Microbiol Rev 2019;33:e0000919. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00009-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liaquat, S, Baccaglini, L, Haynatzki, G, Medcalf, SJ, Rupp, ME. Clinical consequences of contaminated blood cultures in adult hospitalized patients at an institution utilizing a rapid blood-culture identification system. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021;42:978984. DOI: 10.1017/ash.2022.22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alahmadi, YM, Aldeyab, MA, McElnay, JC, et al. Clinical and economic impact of contaminated blood cultures within the hospital setting. J Hosp Infect 2011;77:233236. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.09.033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziegler, MJ, Pellegrini, DC, Safdar, N. Attributable mortality of central line associated bloodstream infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Infection 2015;43:2936. DOI: 10.1007/s15010-014-0689-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Grady, NP, Alexander, E, Alhazzani, W, et al. Society of Critical Care Medicine and the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for evaluating new fever in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med 2023;51:15701586. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherertz, RJ, Karchmer, TB, Palavecino, E, Bischoff, W. Blood drawn through valved hub connectors carries a significant risk of contamination. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2011;30:1571–7. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-011-1262-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rupp, ME, Cavalieri, RJ, Marolf, C, Lyden, E. Reduction in blood culture contamination through use of initial specimen diversion device. Clin Infect Dis 2017;65:201205. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, DW, Goldman, L, Lee, TH. Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization. The true consequences of false-positive results. JAMA 1991;265:365369. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1991.03460030071031 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Souvenir, D, Anderson, DE Jr, Palpant, S, et al. Blood cultures positive for coagulase-negative staphylococci: antisepsis, pseudobacteremia, and therapy of patients. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:19231926. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.36.7.1923-1926.1998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hankins, R, Majorant, OD, Rupp, ME, et al. Microbial colonization of intravascular catheter connectors in hospitalized patients. Am J Infect Control 2019;47:14891492. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.05.024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Dose-ranging study. Quantitative culture results and blood culture time-to-positivity for colonization model and contamination model

Figure 1

Figure 1. (A) Representative scanning electron micrograph of colonized catheter demonstrating numerous intralumenal adherent staphylococci. (B) Representative scanning electron micrograph of contaminated diaphragmatic surface of CVC connector valve demonstrating rare adherent staphylococci.

Supplementary material: File

Rupp et al. supplementary material

Rupp et al. supplementary material
Download Rupp et al. supplementary material(File)
File 21.6 KB