Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:45:27.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Infections With Multiple Interventions Putting Science and Data to the Test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Michael Lutarewych ,
Sandra P. Morgan  and
Melanie M. Hall
Michael Lutarewych
Affiliation:
Southwest Florida Regional Medical Center, Ft. Myers, Florida
Sandra P. Morgan
Affiliation:
Southwest Florida Regional Medical Center, Ft. Myers, Florida
Melanie M. Hall*
Affiliation:
Southwest Florida Regional Medical Center, Ft. Myers, Florida
*
Southwest Florida Regional Medical Center, 2727 Winkler Avenue, Ft. Myers, FL 33901
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 2001, 7.58% of our coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients developed surgical-site infection (SSI) as compared with 3.57% in National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System hospitals from January 1992 to June 2001. Seven new preventive measures were implemented and in 2002, the rate was 3.47%. Implementing evidence-based measures improved patient outcomes.

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 25 , Issue 6 , June 2004 , pp. 517 - 519
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Athos, RJ, Marrin, CA, Arruda, J, Whalen, PK, Beach, M, Yeager, MP. Insulin infusion improves neutrophil function in diabetic cardiac surgery patients. Anesth Analg 1999;88:1011–1016.Google Scholar
2.Fietsom, R Jr, Bassett, J, Glover, JL. Complications of coronary artery surgery in diabetic patients. Am Surg 1991;57:551–557.Google Scholar
3.Furnary, AP, Zerrk, J, Grunkemeir, GL, Starr, A. Continuous intravenous insulin infusion reduces incidence of deep sternal wound infection in diabetic patients after cardiac surgical procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:352–362.Google Scholar
4.Borer, B, Gilod, J, Meydon, N, et al.Impact of monitoring of infection control practices on deep sternal infection after open-heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:515–520.Google Scholar
5.Copeland, M, Senkowski, C, Ulcickas, M, Mendelson, M, Griepp, RB. Breast size as a risk factor for sternal wound complications following cardiac surgery. Arch Surg 1994;129:757–759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Sports bra cuts sternal wound infection. Operating Room Manager 2001;17:22.Google Scholar
7.Archer, GL, Climo, MW. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: consider the source. N Engl J Med 2001;344:55–56.Google Scholar
8.von Eiff, C, Becker, K, Machka, K, Stammer, H, Peters, G. Nasal carriage as a source of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. N Engl J Med 2001;344:11–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Usry, GH, Johnson, L, Weems, JJ, Blackhurst, D. Process improvement plan for the reduction of sternal surgical site infections among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Am J Infect Control 2002;30:434–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.VandenBergh, MF, Klutymans, JA, vanHout, BA, et al.Cost-effectiveness of perioperative mupirocin nasal ointment in cardiothoracic surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;12:775–779.Google Scholar