Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:52:23.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of an Ethanol-Based Spray Disinfectant for Decontamination of Cover Gowns Prior to Removal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2016

Sreelatha Koganti ,
Heba Alhmidi ,
Myreen E. Tomas ,
Jennifer L. Cadnum ,
Christopher Sass ,
Annette L. Jencson  and
Curtis J. Donskey
Sreelatha Koganti
Affiliation:
Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Heba Alhmidi
Affiliation:
Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Myreen E. Tomas
Affiliation:
Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Jennifer L. Cadnum
Affiliation:
Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Christopher Sass
Affiliation:
Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Annette L. Jencson
Affiliation:
Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Curtis J. Donskey*
Affiliation:
Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
*
Address correspondence to Curtis J. Donskey, MD, Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 10701 East Boulevard, Cleveland, OH, ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An ethanol-based spray disinfectant significantly reduced bacteriophage MS2 contamination on material from gowns meeting ASTM standard 1671 for resistance to blood and viral penetration and on a cover gown worn by personnel. Effectiveness of disinfection was affected by the type of gown material and the correctness of fit.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:364–366

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , March 2017 , pp. 364 - 366
Copyright
© 2016 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Tomas, ME, Kundrapu, S, Thota, P, et al. Contamination of healthcare personnel during removal of personal protective equipment. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:1904–1910.Google Scholar
2. Guidance on personal protective equipment (PPE) to be used by healthcare workers during management of patients with confirmed ebola or persons under investigation (PUIs) for ebola who are clinically unstable or have bleeding, vomiting, or diarrhea in US hospitals, including procedures for donning and doffing PPE. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-us/ppe/guidance.html. Updated 2015. Accessed November 11, 2016.Google Scholar
3. Casanova, L, Rutala, WA, Weber, DJ, Sobsey, MD. Methods for the recovery of a model virus from healthcare personal protective equipment. J Appl Microbiol 2009;106:1244–1251.Google Scholar
4. ASTM International, Designation E2197: Standard quantitative disk carrier test method for determining bactericidal, virucidal, fungicidal, mycobactericidal, and sporicidal activities of liquid chemical germicides. ASTM International website. https://www.astm.org/Standards/E2197.htm. Published 2011. Accessed November 11, 2016.Google Scholar
5. ASTM F1670/F1670M-08(2014): Standard test method for resistance of materials used in protective clothing to penetration by synthetic blood. ASTM International website. https://www.astm.org/Standards/F1670.htm. Published 2014. Accessed November 11, 2016.Google Scholar
6. ASTM F1671/F1671M-13: Standard test method for resistance of materials used in protective clothing to penetration by blood-borne pathogens using phi-X174 bacteriophage penetration as a test system. ASTM International website. https://www.astm.org/Standards/F1671.htm. Published 2013. Accessed November 11, 2016.Google Scholar
7. Sickbert-Bennett, EE, Weber, DJ, Gergen-Teague, MF, Sobsey, MD, Samsa, GP, Rutala, WA.. Comparative efficacy of hand hygiene agents in the reduction of bacteria and viruses. Am J Infect Control 2005;33:67–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Kampf, G, Grotheer, D, Steinmann, J.. Efficacy of three ethanol based hand rubs against feline calicivirus, a surrogate virus for norovirus. J Hosp Infect 2005;60:144–149.Google Scholar
9. Casanova, LM, Teal, LJ, Sickbert-Bennett, EE, Anderson, DJ, Sexton, DJ, Rutala, WA, Weber, DJ. Assessment of self-contamination during removal of personal protective equipment for Ebola patient care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:1156–1161.Google Scholar