Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:34:49.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of a New Method of Detection of Nosocomial Infection in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: The Infection Control Sentinel Sheet System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

E.L. Ford-Jones*
Affiliation:
Division of Infection Diseases, Department of Pediatric., The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
C.M. Mindorff
Affiliation:
Division of Infection Diseases, Department of Pediatric., The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
E. Pollock
Affiliation:
Department of Intensive Care Medicine The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
R. Milner
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
D. Bohn
Affiliation:
Department of Intensive Care Medicine The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
J. Edmonds
Affiliation:
Department of Intensive Care Medicine The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
G. Barker
Affiliation:
Department of Intensive Care Medicine The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
R. Gold
Affiliation:
Division of Infection Diseases, Department of Pediatric., The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
*
Division of Infectious Disease, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaM5G 1X8

Abstract

To improve the efficiency of nosocomial infection detection, a highly structured system combining initial reporting by the bedside night nurse of symptoms possibly related to infection with follow-up by the infection control nurse (ICN) was developed: The Infection Control Sentinel Sheet System (ICSSS).

Between July 1, 1987 and February 28, 1988, a prospective comparison of results obtained through ICSSS and daily bedside observation/chart review by a full-time trained intensivist was undertaken in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Ratios of nosocomial infections and nosocomially-infected patients were 15.8 and 7.0 respectively among 685 admissions; included are seven infections identified only through the ICSSS so that the “gold standard” became an amalgamation of the two systems. The sensitivity for detection of nosocomially-infected patients by bedside observation/chart review and ICSSS was 100% and 87% respectively. The sensitivity for detection of standard infections (blood, wound and urine) was 88% and 85% respectively. The sensitivity for detection of nosocomial infections at all sites was 94% and 72% respectively. Missed infections were minor (e.g., drain, skin, eye), required physician diagnosis (e.g., pneumonia), were not requested on the sentinel sheet (SS) (e.g., otitis media), related to follow-up of deceased patients or were minor misclassifications or failures to associate with device (e.g., central-line related). Daily PICU surveillance by the ICN required only 20 minutes a day. The ICSSS appears highly promising and has many unmeasured benefits.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Haley, RW, Culver, DH, White, JW, et al. The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121:182205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Eickhoff, TC, Brachman, PS, Bennett, JV, et al. Surveillance of nosocomial infections in community hospitals, I: surveillance methods, effectiveness and initial results. J Infect Dis. 1969;120:305317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Wenzel, RP. Osterman, CA, Hunting, KJ, Gwaltney, JM Jr. Hospital-acquired infections, I: surveillance in a university hospital. Am J Epidemiol. 1976;103:251260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Thoburn, R. Fekety, FR. Cluff, LE. Infections acquired by hospitalized patients. Arch intern Med. 1968;121:110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Haley, RW, Schaberg, DR. McClish, DK, et al. This accuracy of retrospective C hart review in measuring nosocomial infection rates. Am J Epidemiol. 1980;111:516533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Freeman, J, McGowan, JE Jr. Methodologie issues in hospital epidemiology, 1: rates, case finding and interpretation. Rev Infect Dis. 1981;3:658667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Kislak, JW, Eickhoff, TC, Finland, M. Hospital-acquired infections and antibiotic usage in the Boston City Hospital. N Engl J Med. 1964;271:834835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Thompson, RL. Surveillance and reporting of nosocomial infections. In: Wenzel, R, ed. Prevention and Control of Nosocomial Infections. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins;1987:7082.Google Scholar
9. Milliken, J, Tait, GA, Ford-Jones, L, Mindorff, CM, Gold, R, Mullins, G. Nosocomial infections in a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1988;16:233237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Simon, AE, Ricci, J, Lau, A, Bannatyne, R, Ford-Jones, EL. Pseudobac-teremia due to Pseudomonas fluorescens . Pediatr Infect Dis. 1985;4:508512.Google Scholar
11. Ford-Jones, EL, Mindorff, CM, Gold, R. Satellite infection control committees within the hospital: decentralizing for action. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1989;10:368370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Hofherr, L. Nosocomial infection surveillance techniques-a review. Am J Inject Control. 1979;7:1215.Google ScholarPubMed
13. Andrews, C. ICPs use epidemiology listings to pick up potential infections. Hospital Infection Control. 1988;127:15.Google Scholar