Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:14:31.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Preoperative Shampoos with Chlorhexidine or lodophor on Emergence of Resident Scalp Flora in Neurosurgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Jeanne M. Leclair ,
Ken R. Winston ,
Bernadette F. Sullivan ,
Janet M. O'Connell ,
Stella M. Harrington  and
Donald A. Goldmann
Jeanne M. Leclair*
Affiliation:
Infection Control Program and Departments of Nueorsurgery and Medicine, The Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Ken R. Winston
Affiliation:
Infection Control Program and Departments of Nueorsurgery and Medicine, The Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Bernadette F. Sullivan
Affiliation:
Infection Control Program and Departments of Nueorsurgery and Medicine, The Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Janet M. O'Connell
Affiliation:
Infection Control Program and Departments of Nueorsurgery and Medicine, The Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Stella M. Harrington
Affiliation:
Infection Control Program and Departments of Nueorsurgery and Medicine, The Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Donald A. Goldmann
Affiliation:
Infection Control Program and Departments of Nueorsurgery and Medicine, The Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
*
Hospital Epidemiology Department, Brady #119, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Wound contamination with endogenous bacterial scalp flora plays an important role in the pathogenesis of postoperative neurosurgical infections. To assess the effect of preoperative antiseptic shampoos on the emergence of resident scalp flora during surgery and subsequent wound contamination, we randomized 151 neurosurgical procedures into four study groups: group A—preoperative shampoos with chlorhexidine, surgical scalp preparation with chlorhexidine; group B-no shampoos, surgical preparation with chlorhexidine; group C-shampoos with iodophor, surgical preparation with iodophor; group D-no shampoos, surgical preparation with iodophor. Quantitative cultures of the scalp were obtained preoperatively and at the end of surgery, and qualitative wound cultures were taken prior to wound closure. Group A had the lowest concentration of bacteria on the scalp both preoperatively and postoperatively (median range = 30 [0-5.7 × 105] and 0 [0-2.5 x 103] respectively). Group A also had significantly fewer positive postoperative scalp cultures (29%) than groups B (51%), C (58%), and D (53%) (P<0.05), as well as fewer positive wound cultures (20% v 25%, 42%, and 30% respectively). A density of bacteria on the scalp of > 102/4cm2 best predicted the presence of bacteria in the wound. Repeated preoperative shampoos with chlorhexidine reduce intraoperative emergence of resident skin flora and subsequent contamination of the wound.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 8 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Nelson, JD: Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections. Pediatr Infect Dis 1984; 3:530–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Welch, K: Residual shunt infection in a program aimed at its prevention. Presented at 23rd annual meeting of the Society for Research into Hydrocephalus and Spina Bifida, Newcastel-Upon-Tyne, 06 1979.Google Scholar
3.Schoenbaum, SC, Gardner, P, Shillito, J: Infections of cerebrospinal fluid shunts: Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and therapy. J Infect Dis 1975; 131:543–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Bayston, R, Lari, J: A study of the sources of infection in colonized shunts. Dev Med Child Neurol 1974; 16(suppl 32):16–22.Google Scholar
5.Schimke, RT, Black, PH, Mark, VH. et al: Indolent Staphylococcus albus or aureus bacteremia after ventriculo-atriostomy. Role of foreign body in its initiation and perpetuation. N Engl J Med 1961; 264:261–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Venes, JL: Control of shunt infection: Report of 150 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg 1976; 45:311–314.Google Scholar
7.Sells, JJ, Shurlteff, DB: Gram-negative cerebrospinal Huid shunt-associated infections. Pediatrics 1977; 59(2):614–618.Google Scholar
8.Rodeheaver, G. Bellamy, W, Kody, M. et al: Bactericidal activity and toxicity of iodine-containing solutions in wounds. Arch Surg 1982; 117:181–185.Google Scholar
9Lowbury, EJL, Lilly, HA: Use of 4% chlorhexidine solution and other methods of skin disinfection. Br Med J 1973; 3:510–515.Google Scholar
10Brandberg, A, Andersson, I: Preoperative whole body disinfection by shower bath with chlorhexidine soap: Effect on transmission of bacteria from skin flora, in Maibach, HI, Aly, R (eds); Skin Microbiology: Relevance to Clinical Infection. New York. Springer-Verlag, 1981, pp 98–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11La Rocca, PT, La Rocca, MAK: An evalution of the antimicrobial efficacy of a 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate 70% isopropyl alcohol solution (Hibitane Tincture) when used for skin antisepsis. Dev Indust Microbiol 1982; 23:547–550.Google Scholar
12Russell, AD, Hugo, WB, Ayliffe, GAJ (eds): Principles and Practice of Disinfection, Preservation and Sterilization. Oxford. Blakwell Scientific Publications, 1982. p 126.Google Scholar
13Lenette, EH. Balows, A, Hausler, WJ. et al (eds): Manual of Clinical Microbiology. ed 3. Washington DC, American Society for Microbiology, 1980.Google Scholar
14Kligman, AM: The bacteriology of normal skin, in Maibach, HI, Hildick, Smith (eds): Skin Bacteria and Their Role in Infection. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1955, pp 13–31.Google Scholar
15.Price, PB: The bacteriology of normal skin: A new quantitative test applied to a study of the bacterial flora and the disinfection action of mechanical cleansing. J Infect Dis 1938; 63:301–318.Google Scholar
16.Davidson, AI, Smith, G, Smylie, GH: A bacteriological study of the immediate environment of a surgical wound. Br J Surg 1971; 58:326–333.Google Scholar
17.Selwyn, S, Ellis, H: Skin bacteria and skin disinfection reconsidered. Br Med J 1972: 1:136–140.Google Scholar
IX.Marples, MJ: The bacteria inhabiting the skin—The micrococcaceae, in Thomas, CC (ed): The Ecology of the Human Skin. Springfield, IL, Charles C Thomas, 1965, pp 578–595.Google Scholar
I!.Shaw, CM, Smith, JA, McBride, ME, et al: An evaluation of techniques for sampling skin flora. J Invest Dermatol 1970; 54:160–163.Google Scholar
20.Evans, CA, Stevens, RJ: Differential quantitation of surface and subsurface bacteria of normal skin by the combined use of the cotton swab and the scrub methods. J Clin Microbiol 1976; 3:576–581.Google Scholar
21.Williamson, P: Quantitative estimation of cutaneous bacteria. in Maibach, HI, Hildick-Smith, (eds): Skin Bacteria and Their Role in Infection. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1965, pp 3–11.Google Scholar
22.Williamson, P. Kligman, AM: A new method for the quantitative investigation of cutaneous bacteria. J Invest Dermatol 1965; 45:498–503.Google Scholar
23.Ulrich, JA: Technics of skin sampling for microbial contaminants. Health Lab Sci 1964; 1:133–136.Google Scholar