Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:51:49.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Drainage Bag Additive Saga

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Calvin M. Kunin
Calvin M. Kunin*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
*
Pomerene Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Rm M110 Starling-Loving Hall, 320 W. 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210-1240
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 6 , Issue 7 , July 1985 , pp. 261 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1985

References

1.Kunin, CM: Genitourinary infections in the patientnt risk: Extrinsic risk factors. Am J Med 1984; 75(5A):131–139.Google Scholar
2.Givens, CD, Wenzel, RP: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in surgical patients: A controlled study on the excess morbidity and costs. J Urol 1980; 124:646–648.Google Scholar
3.Dukes, C: Urinary infections after excision of the rectum: Their cause and prevention. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 1928;22:1–11.Google Scholar
4.Maizels, M, Schaeffer, AJ: Decreased incidence of bacteriuria associated with periodic instillations of hydrogen peroxide in the urethral catheter drainage bag. J Urol 1980; 123:841–845.Google Scholar
5.Evans, AT, Cicmanic, JF: The role of Betadine microbicides in urine bag sterilization, in Proceedings of the Second World Congress on A ntisepsis, New York, H.P. Publishing, 1980, pp 85–86.Google Scholar
6.Southampton Infection Control Team. Evaluation of aseptic techniques and Chlorhexidine on the rate of catheter-associated urinary-tract infection. Lancet 1982; 1:89–91.Google Scholar
7.Thompson, RL, Haley, CE, Searcy, MA, et al: Catheter-associated bacteriuria: Failure to reduce attack rates using periodic instillations of a disinfectant into urinary drainage systems. JAMA 1984; 251:747–751.Google Scholar
8.Gillespie, WA, Jones, JE, Teasdale, C, et al: Does the addition of disinfectant to urine drainage bags prevent infection in calheterized patients? Lancet 1983; 2:1037–1039.Google Scholar
9.Kunin, CM, McCormack, RC: Prevention of catheter-induced urinary tract infections by sterile closed drainage. N Engl J Med 1966; 274:1156–1161.Google Scholar
10.Schaeffer, AJ: Catheter-associated bacteriuria in patients in reverse isolation. J Urol 1982; 128:752–754.Google Scholar
11.Kass, EH, Schneiderman, LJ: Entry of bacteria into the urinary tracts of patients with inlying catheters. N Engl J Med 1957; 256:556–557.Google Scholar
12.Garibaldi, RA, Burke, JP, Britt, MR, et al: Meatal colonization and catheter-associated bacteriuria. N Engl J Med 1980; 303:216–218.Google Scholar
13.Daifuku, R, Stamm, WE: Association of rectal and urethral colonization with urinary tract infection in patients with indwelling catheters. JAMA 1984; 252:2028–2030.Google Scholar
14.Kunin, CM, Steele, C: Culture of the surface of urinary catheters to sample the urethral flora and study the effect of antimicrobial therapy. J Clin Microbiol 1985, to be published.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Maki, DG, Hennekens, CG, Phillips, CW, et alNosocomial urinary tract infection with Seiratia marscescens: An epidemiologic study. J Infect Dis 1973; 128:579–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Schaberg, DR, Alford, RH, Anderson, R, et al: An outbreak of nosocomial infection due to multiply resistant Seiratia marscescens: Evidence for interhospital spread. Infect Dis 1976; 134:181–188.Google Scholar