Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:06:10.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does the Composition of Urinary Catheters Influence Clinical Outcomes and the Results of Research Studies?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Christopher J. Crnich  and
Paul J. Drinka
Christopher J. Crnich*
Affiliation:
Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison
Paul J. Drinka
Affiliation:
Internal Medicine / Geriatrics, University of Wisconsin—Madison Wisconsin Veterans Home, King Medical College of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, Milwaukee
*
University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Avenue, CSC H4/572, Madison, WI 53792 ([email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , January 2007 , pp. 102 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2007

References

1. Srinivasan, A, Karchemer, T, Richards, A, Song, X, Perl, T. A prospective trial of a novel, silicone-based, silver-coated Foley catheter for the prevention of nosocomial urinary tract infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:38–43.Google Scholar
2. Johnson, JR, Kuskowski, MA, Wilt, TJ. Systematic review: antimicrobial urinary catheters to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection in hospitalized patients. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:116–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Liedberg, H, Lundeberg, T, Ekman, P. Refinements in the coating of urethral catheters reduces the incidence of catheter-associated bacteriuria. An experimental and clinical study. Eur Urol 1990;17:236–240.Google Scholar
4. Leidberg, H, Lundberg, T. Silver alloy coated catheters reduce catheter associated bacteriuria. Br J Urol 1990;65:379–381.Google Scholar
5. Leidberg, H, Lundeberg, T. Prospective study of incidence of urinary tract infection in patients catheterized with Bard hydrogel and silver-coated catheters or Bard hydrogel-coated catheters (abstract). J Urol 1993;149:405A.Google Scholar
6. Verleyen, P, DeRidder, D, Poppel, HV, Baert, L. Clinical application of the Bardex 1C Foley catheter. Eur Urol 1999;36:240–246.Google Scholar
7. Maki, DG, Knasinski, V, Halvorson, KT, Tambyah, PA. A novel silver hydrogel urinary catheter reduces catheter-associated urinary tract infections. A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial (abstract). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:682.Google Scholar
8. Thibon, P, Le Coutour, X, Leroyer, R, Fabry, J. Randomized multi-centre trial of the effects of a catheter coated with hydrogel and silver salts on the incidence of hospital acquired urinary tract infections. J Hosp Infect 2000;45:117–124.Google Scholar
9. Karchmer, TB, Giannetta, ET, Muto, CA, Strain, BA, Farr, BM. A randomized crossover study of silver-coated urinary catheters in hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:3294–3298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Ferrie, BG, Groome, J, Sethia, B, Kirk, D. Comparison of silicone and latex catheters in the development of urethral stricture after cardiac surgery. Brit J Urol 1986;58:549–550.Google Scholar
11. Wise, HA II, Engel, RME, Whitaker, RH. Treatment of urethral strictures. J Urol 1972;107:269–272.Google Scholar
12. Cox, AJ, Hukins, DWL, Sutton, TM. Infection of catheterised patients: bacterial colonisation of encrusted Foley catheters shown by scanning electron microscopy. Urol Res 1989;17:349–352.Google Scholar
13. Ruutu, M, Alfthan, O, Talja, M, Andersson, LC. Cytotoxicity of latex urinary catheters. Brit J Urol 1985;57:82–87.Google Scholar
14. Edwards, LE, Lock, R, Powell, C, Jones, P. Post-catheterisation urethral strictures: a clinical and experimental study. Brit J Urol 1983;55:53–56.Google Scholar
15. Nacey, JN, Tulloch, AGS, Ferguson, AF. Catheter-induced urethritis: a comparison between latex and silicone catheters in a prospective clinical trial. Brit J Urol 1985;57:325–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Kunin, CM, Chin, QF, Chambers, S. Formation of encrustations on indwelling urinary catheters in the elderly: a comparison of different types of catheter materials in “blockers” and “non-blockers.” J Urol 1987;138:899–902.Google Scholar