Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:37:37.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does a mobile dust-containment cart reduce the risk of healthcare-associated fungal infections during above-ceiling work?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2020

Mark O. Buchanan*
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Sharon C. Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Lauren M. DiBiase
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina Division of Infectious Diseases, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Emily E. Sickbert-Bennett
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina Division of Infectious Diseases, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
David J. Weber
Affiliation:
Department of Hospital Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina Division of Infectious Diseases, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
*
Author for correspondence: Mark O. Buchanan, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Immunocompromised patients are at risk for infections due to above-ceiling activities in hospitals. Mobile dust-containment carts are available as environmental controls, but no published data support their efficacy. Using microbial air sampling and particle counts, we provide evidence of reduced risk of fungal exposure during open ceiling activities.

Type
Concise Communication
Copyright
© 2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kanamori, H, Rutala, WA, Sickbert-Bennett, EE, Weber, DJ. Review of fungal outbreaks and infection prevention in healthcare settings during construction and renovation. Clin Infect Dis 2015;61:433444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guspiel, A, Vogel, RA. Chapter 2: Construction documents. In: Infection Prevention Manual for Construction & Renovation, first edition. Arlington, VA: APIC; 2015:1216.Google Scholar
Macher, JM. Positive-hole correction of multiple-jet impactors for collecting viable microorganisms. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1989;50:561568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S, Lee, DK. What is the proper way to apply the multiple comparison test? Korean J Anesthesiol 2018;71:353360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, SY, Myong, JP, Kim, WB, et al. Profiles of environmental mold: indoor and outdoor air sampling in a hematology hospital in Seoul, South Korea. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15(11):2560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, CC, Ananda-Rajah, M, Belcastro, A, et al. Consensus guidelines for implementation of quality processes to prevent invasive fungal disease and enhanced surveillance measures during hospital building works, 2014. Intern Med J 2014;44:13891397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armadans-Gil, L, Rodríguez-Garrido, V, Campins-Martí, M, Gil-Cuesta, J, Vaqué-Rafart, J. Particle counting and microbiological air sampling: results of the simultaneous use of both procedures in different types of hospital rooms. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2013;31:217221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, KY, Mohamed, KH, Nazri, K, et al. Correlation between particulate matter and microbial counts in hospital operating rooms. Adv Environ Biol 2018;12:14.Google Scholar
Newcomer, DA, LaPuma, P, Brandys, R, Northcross, A. Capture efficiency of portable high-efficiency air filtration devices used during building construction activities. J Occup Environ Hyg 2018;15:285292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed