Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:31:18.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developing a Risk Stratification Model for Surgical Site Infection after Abdominal Hysterectomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Margaret A. Olsen ,
James Higham-Kessler ,
Deborah S. Yokoe ,
Anne M. Butler ,
Johanna Vostok ,
Kurt B. Stevenson ,
Yosef Khan ,
Victoria J. Fraser  and
Prevention Epicenter Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Margaret A. Olsen*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
James Higham-Kessler
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
Deborah S. Yokoe
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Anne M. Butler
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
Johanna Vostok
Affiliation:
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, Massachusetts
Kurt B. Stevenson
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio Division of Infectious Diseases, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Yosef Khan
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio Division of Infectious Diseases, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Victoria J. Fraser
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
*
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8051, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110-1093 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective.

The incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) after hysterectomy ranges widely from 2% to 21%. A specific risk stratification index could help to predict more accurately the risk of incisional SSI following abdominal hysterectomy and would help determine the reasons for the wide range of reported SSI rates in individual studies. To increase our understanding of the risk factors needed to build a specific risk stratification index, we performed a retrospective multihospital analysis of risk factors for SSI after abdominal hysterectomy.

Methods.

Retrospective case-control study of 545 abdominal and 275 vaginal hysterectomies from July 1, 2003, to June 30, 2005, at 4 institutions. SSIs were defined by using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance criteria. Independent risk factors for abdominal hysterectomy were identified by using logistic regression.

Results.

There were 13 deep incisional, 53 superficial incisional, and 18 organ-space SSIs after abdominal hysterectomy and 14 organ-space SSIs after vaginal hysterectomy. Because risk factors for organ-space SSI were different according to univariate analysis, we focused further analyses on incisional SSI after abdominal hysterectomy. The maximum serum glucose level within 5 days after operation was highest in patients with deep incisional SSI, lower in patients with superficial incisional SSI, and lowest in uninfected patients (median, 189, 156, and 141 mg/dL, respectively; P = .005). Independent risk factors for incisional SSI included blood transfusion (odds ratio [OR], 2.4) and morbid obesity (body mass index [BMI], >35; OR, 5.7). Duration of operation greater than the 75th percentile (OR, 1.7), obesity (BMI, 30–35; OR, 3.0), and lack of private health insurance (OR, 1.7) were marginally associated with increased odds of SSI.

Conclusions.

Incisional SSI after abdominal hysterectomy was associated with increased BMI and blood transfusion. Longer duration of operation and lack of private health insurance were marginally associated with SSI.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 30 , Issue 11 , November 2009 , pp. 1077 - 1083
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Whiteman, MK, Hillis, SD, Jamieson, DJ, et al.Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000–2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:34–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Edwards, JR, Peterson, KD, Andrus, ML, Dudeck, MA, Pollock, DA, Horan, TC. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report, data summary for 2006 through 2007, issued November 2008. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:609–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Reilly, J, Allardice, G, Bruce, J, Hill, R, McCoubrey, J. Procedure-specific surgical site infection rates and postdischarge surveillance in Scotland. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:1318–1323.Google Scholar
4.Shapiro, M, Munoz, A, Tager, IB, Schoenbaum, SC, Polk, BF. Risk factors for infection at the operative site after abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy. N Engl J Med 1982;307:1661–1666.Google Scholar
5.Kandula, PV, Wenzel, RP. Postoperative wound infection after total abdominal hysterectomy: a controlled study of the increased duration of hospital stay and trends in postoperative wound infection. Am J Infect Control 1993;21:201–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Soper, DE, Bump, RC, Hurt, WG. Wound infection after abdominal hysterectomy: effect of the depth of subcutaneous tissue. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:465–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Korn, AP, Grullon, K, Hessol, N, Lin, P, Siopak, J. Does vaginal cuff closure decrease the infectious morbidity associated with abdominal hysterectomy? J Am Coll Surg 1997;185:404–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Persson, E, Bergstrom, M, Larsson, PG, et al.Infections after hysterectomy: a prospective nation-wide Swedish study. The Study Group on Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology within the Swedish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996;75:757–761.Google Scholar
9.Taylor, G, Herrick, T, Mah, M. Wound infections after hysterectomy: opportunities for practice improvement. Am J Infect Control 1998;26:254–257.Google Scholar
10.Ahmed, F, Wasti, S. Infectious complications following abdominal hysterectomy in Karachi, Pakistan. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001;73:27–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Chongsomchai, C, Lumbiganon, P, Thinkhamrop, J, Ounchai, J, Vudhikamraksa, N. Placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study of prophylactic antibiotics in elective abdominal hysterectomy. J Hosp Infect 2002;52:302–306.Google Scholar
12.Davies, A, Hart, R, Magos, A, Hadad, E, Morris, R. Hysterectomy: surgical route and complications. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002;104:148–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Eason, E, Wells, G, Garber, G, et al.Antisepsis for abdominal hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial of povidone-iodine gel. BJOG 2004;111:695–699.Google Scholar
14.Rodriguez, JF, Trobo, AR, Garcia, MV, et al.The effect of performance feedback on wound infection rate in abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Infect Control 2006;34:182–187.Google Scholar
15.Leung, PL, Tsang, SW, Yuen, PM. An audit on hysterectomy for benign diseases in public hospitals in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 2007;13:187–193.Google Scholar
16.Anderson, DJ, Chen, LF, Sexton, DJ, Kaye, KS. Complex surgical site infections and the devilish details of risk adjustment: important implications for public reporting. Infect Control Hasp Epidemiol 2008;29:941–946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Molina-Cabrillana, J, Valle-Morales, L, Hernandez-Vera, J, Lopez-Carrio, I, Garcia-Hernandez, JA, Bolanos-Rivero, M. Surveillance and risk factors on hysterectomy wound infection rate in Gran Canaria, Spain. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;136:232–238.Google Scholar
18.Gaynes, RP. Surgical-site infections and the NNIS SSI Risk Index: room for improvement. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000;21:184–185.Google Scholar
19.Geubbels, EL, Grobbee, DE, Vandenbroucke-Grauls, CM, Wille, JC, de Boer, AS. Improved risk adjustment for comparison of surgical site infection rates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:1330–1339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Yokoe, DS, Noskin, GA, Cunningham, SM, et al.Enhanced identification of postoperative infections among inpatients. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:1924–1930.Google Scholar
21.Mangram, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearson, ML, Silver, LC, Jarvis, WR. Guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:250–280.Google Scholar
22.Allison, PD. Missing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2001.Google Scholar
23.SAS Institute. SAS OnlineDoc, version 8. SAS Institute; 2001. Available at: http://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/v82/whatsnew/zenid-96.htm. Accessed March 1, 2008.Google Scholar
24.Thomas, EJ, Goldman, L, Mangione, CM, et al.Body mass index as a correlate of postoperative complications and resource utilization. Am J Med 1997;102:277–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Olsen, MA, Lock-Buckley, P, Hopkins, D, Polish, LB, Sundt, TM, Fraser, VJ. The risk factors for deep and superficial chest surgical-site infections after coronary artery bypass graft surgery are different. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124:136–145.Google Scholar
26.Olsen, MA, Lefta, M, Dietz, JR, et al.Risk factors for surgical site infection after major breast operation. J Am Coll Surg 2008;207:326–335.Google Scholar
27.Walz, JM, Paterson, CA, Seligowski, JM, Heard, SO. Surgical site infection following bowel surgery: a retrospective analysis of 1446 patients. Arch Surg 2006;141:1014–1018.Google Scholar
28.Banbury, MK, Brizzio, ME, Rajeswaran, J, Lytle, BW, Blackstone, EH. Transfusion increases the risk of postoperative infection after cardiovascular surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:131–138.Google Scholar
29.Vamvakas, EC, Blajchman, MA. Transfusion-related immunomodulation (TRIM): an update. Blood Rev 2007;21:327–348.Google Scholar
30.Hager, DW, Larsen, JW. Postoperative infections: prevention and management. In: Rock, JA, Jones, HW III eds. Te Linde's Operative Gynecology. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008:190–202.Google Scholar
31.Wexler, DJ, Nathan, DM, Grant, RW, Regan, S, Van Leuvan, AL, Cagliero, E. Prevalence of elevated hemoglobin A1c among patients admitted to the hospital without a diagnosis of diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93:4238–4244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Charfen, MA, Ipp, E, Kaji, AH, Saleh, T, Qazi, MF, Lewis, RJ. Detection of undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetic states in high-risk emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 2009;16:394–402.Google Scholar