Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:55:15.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Detection of Postoperative Surgical-Site Infections: Comparison of Health Plan–Based Surveillance With Hospital-Based Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Kenneth E. Sands ,
Deborah S. Yokoe ,
David C. Hooper ,
John L. Tully ,
Teresa C. Horan ,
Robert P. Gaynes ,
Steven L. Solomon  and
Richard Platt
Kenneth E. Sands*
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Eastern Massachusetts Prevention Epicenter, Boston, Massachusetts Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Deborah S. Yokoe
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Eastern Massachusetts Prevention Epicenter, Boston, Massachusetts Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
David C. Hooper
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Eastern Massachusetts Prevention Epicenter, Boston, Massachusetts Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
John L. Tully
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Eastern Massachusetts Prevention Epicenter, Boston, Massachusetts Mt. Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Teresa C. Horan
Affiliation:
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Robert P. Gaynes
Affiliation:
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Steven L. Solomon
Affiliation:
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Richard Platt
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Eastern Massachusetts Prevention Epicenter, Boston, Massachusetts Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Harvard Medical School, and Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Boston, Massachusetts
*
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Review of health plan administrative data has been shown to be more sensitive than other methods for identifying postdischarge surgical-site infections (SSIs), but there has not been a direct comparison between this method and hospital-based surveillance for all infections, including those diagnosed before discharge. We compared these two methods for identifying SSIs following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures:.

Methods:

We studied 1,352 CABG procedures performed among members of one health plan from March 1993 through June 1997. Health plan administrative records were reviewed based on claims containing diagnoses or procedures suggestive of infection or outpatient dispensing of antibiotics appropriate for SSI. Hospital-based surveillance information was also reviewed. SSI rates were calculated based on the total events identified by either mechanism.

Results:

Postdischarge information was reviewed for 328 (85%) of 388 procedures. SSIs were confirmed in 167 patients (13% overall risk of confirmed SSI; range, 3% to 14% in the 5 hospitals). The overall sensitivity of hospital-based surveillance was 49.7% (83 of 167), and that of health plan data was 71.8% (120 of 167). There was no significant difference among hospitals in the sensitivity of either surveillance mechanism.

Conclusions:

Surveillance based on health plan data identified more postoperative infections, including those occurring before discharge, than did hospital-based surveillance. Screening administrative data and pharmacy activity may be an important adjunct to SSI surveillance, allowing efficient comparison of hospital-specific rates. Interpretation of differences among hospitals' infection rates requires case mix adjustment and understanding of variations in hospitals' discharge diagnosis coding practices

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 24 , Issue 10 , October 2003 , pp. 741 - 743
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Haley, RW, Culver, DH, White JW et al.The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol 985;121:182–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Gaynes, RP, Horan, TC. Surveillance of nosocomial infections. In: Mayhall, CG, ed. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 1999.Google Scholar
3.Mangram, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearson, ML, Silver, LC, Jarvis, WL. Guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:250–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Emori, TG, Edwards, JR, Culver, DH, et al.Accuracy of reporting nosocomial infections in intensive-care-unit patients to the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance system: a pilot study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:308–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Sands, K, Vineyard, G, Platt, R. Surgical site infections occurring after hospital discharge. J Infect Dis 1996;173:963–970.Google Scholar
6.Reimer, K, Gleed, G, Nicolle, LE. The impact of postdischarge infection on surgical wound infection rates. Infection Control 1987;8:237–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Manian, FA, Meyer, L. Comprehensive surveillance of surgical wound infections in outpatient and inpatient surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1990;11:515–520.Google Scholar
8.Burns, SJ. Postoperative wound infections detected during hospitalization and after discharge in a community hospital. Am J Infect Control 1982;10:60–65.Google Scholar
9.Polk, BF, Shapiro, M, Goldstein, P, Tager, I, Gore-White, B, Schoenbaum, SC. Randomised clinical trial of perioperative cefazolin in preventing infection after hysterectomy. Lancet 1980;1:437–441.Google Scholar
10.Brown, RB, Bradley, S, Opitz, E, Cipriani, D, Pieczrka, R, Sands, M. Surgical wound infections documented after hospital discharge. Am J Infect Control 1987;15:54–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Byrne, DJ, Lynce, W, Napier, A, Davey, P, Malek, M, Cuschieri, A. Wound infection rates: the importance of definition and post-discharge wound surveillance. J Hosp Infect 1994;26:37–43.Google Scholar
12.Holtz, TH, Wenzel, RP. Postdischarge surveillance for nosocomial wound infection: a brief review and commentary. Am J Infect Control 1992;20:206–213.Google Scholar
13.Sherertz, RJ, Garibaldi, RA, Marosok, RD. Consensus paper on the surveillance of surgical site infections. Am J Infect Control 1992;20:263–270.Google Scholar
14.Sands, K, Vineyard, G, Livingston, J, Christiansen, C, Platt, R. Efficient identification of postdischarge surgical site infections using automated medical records. J Infect Dis 1999;179:434–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Kaye, KS, Sands, K, Donahue, JG, Chan, KA, Fishman, P, Platt, R. Preoperative drug dispensing predicts surgical site infection. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:57–65.Google Scholar
16.Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Am J Infect Control 1992;20:271–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Newcombe, RG. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Stat Med 1998;17:873–890.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Perencevich, EN, Sands, KE, Cosgrove, SE, Guadagnoli, E, Meara, E, Platt, R. Health and economic impact of surgical site infections diagnosed after hospital discharge. Emerg Infect Dis 2003;9:196–203.Google Scholar