Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:23:25.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Could it be that the B.1.1.7 lineage is more deadly?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2021

Chia Siang Kow*
Affiliation:
School of Postgraduate Studies, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Syed Shahzad Hasan
Affiliation:
School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom School of Biomedical Sciences & Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Chia Siang Kow, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Letter to the Editor
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

To the Editor—The world had been shocked by the emergence of a new variant (B.1.1.7) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which might have been circulated since September 2020 from the southeastern region of England. Reference Kupferschmidt1 As reported, this new lineage of SARS-CoV-2 has acquired 17 mutations in its genome that lead to amino acid changes within the Spike receptor-binding domain. Reference Kupferschmidt1 The analyses thus far have indicated that the B.1.1.7 lineage might be more transmissible than other SARS-CoV-2 lineages, with a reproduction ratio higher than those of other SARS-CoV-2 lineages by 0.4 and 0.7 (ie, up to 70% more transmissible). Reference Volz, Mishra and Chand2 Santos et al Reference Santos and Passos3 employed in silico methods to analyze the interaction between the Spike receptor-binding domain of the B.1.1.7 variant and the ACE2 receptor. They discovered that the N501Y mutant residue on the spike protein of the B.1.1.7 variant establishes a more significant number of interactions with the ACE2 receptor, indicating an increased interaction force with the ACE2 receptor, which could explain its increased infectivity. In contrast, although the newly discovered 501Y.V2 variant, which spread rapidly in the Eastern Cape and Western Cape Provinces of South Africa, also contains the N501Y mutant residue on the spike protein, the substitutions K417N and E484K in the South African variant 501.V2 would reduce its binding affinity with ACE2 receptor, resulting in binding affinity comparable to that of the wild-type Spike receptor-binding domain. Reference Cheng, Krieger, Kaynak, Arditi and Bahar4

Arif Reference Arif5 commented that there is uncertainty regarding the severity of disease in people infected with SARS-CoV-2 of the B.1.1.7 lineage. Nevertheless, the general assumption that the B.1.1.7 lineage would not lead to increased severity of COVID-19 may not hold true because increased binding affinity between the Spike receptor-binding domain and ACE2 receptor could lead to more ACE2 downregulation should an individual acquire this new variant compared to other variants. Reference Lei, Zhang and Schiavon6 Interestingly, the mutation in the D614G variant, which currently dominates in much of the world, does not increase Spike protein affinity for ACE2. Reference Zhang, Jackson and Mou7 Indeed, the D614G variant is not associated with increased severity of COVID-19 compared to the ancestral strain, although with increased viral load. Reference Groves, Rowland-Jones and Angyal8,Reference Korber, Fischer and Gnanakaran9 Until the association between B.1.1.7 lineage and increased severity of COVID-19 is conclusively discredited, perhaps patients who acquire the new B.1.1.7 variant should be managed more aggressively with anti-inflammatory therapies, and the current antiviral armamentarium of COVID-19, especially remdesivir, should be evaluated if it preserves its efficacy against this new variant.

Acknowledgments

Financial support

No financial support was provided relevant to this article.

Conflicts of interest

All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

References

Kupferschmidt, K. Fast-spreading UK virus variant raises alarms. Science 2021;371(6524):910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volz, E, Mishra, S, Chand, M, et al. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England: insights from linking epidemiological and genetic data. medRxiv 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.12.30.20249034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, JC, Passos, GA. The high infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 is associated with increased interaction force between Spike-ACE2 caused by the viral N501Y mutation. bioRxiv 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.12.29.424708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, MH, Krieger, JM, Kaynak, B, Arditi, M, Bahar, I. Impact of South African 501.V2 variant on SARS-CoV-2 spike infectivity and neutralization: a structure-based computational assessment. bioRxiv 2021. Doi: 10.1101/2021.01.10.426143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arif, T. 501.V2 and B.1.1.7 variants of COVID-19: a new time-bomb in the making? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lei, Y, Zhang, J, Schiavon, CR, et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein impairs endothelial function via downregulation of ACE2. bioRxiv 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.12.04.409144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L, Jackson, CB, Mou, H, et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein D614G mutation increases virion spike density and infectivity. Nat Commun 2020;11(1):6013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groves, DC, Rowland-Jones, SL, Angyal, A. The D614G mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: Implications for viral infectivity, disease severity and vaccine design. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.10.109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korber, B, Fischer, WM, Gnanakaran, S, et al. Tracking changes in SARS-CoV-2 spike: evidence that D614G increases infectivity of the COVID-19 virus. Cell 2020;182:812827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed