Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:45:46.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cost-Effectiveness of Perirectal Surveillance Cultures for Controlling Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Michael Edmond*
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University, Health System, Richmond, Virginia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters to the Editor
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2003

References

1.Muto, CA, Giannetta, ET, Durbin, LJ, Simonton, BM, Farr, BM. Cost-effectiveness of perirectal surveillance cultures for controlling vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:429435.Google Scholar
2.Mayhall, CG. Control of vancomycin-resistant enterococci: it is important, it is possible, and it is cost-effective. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:420423.Google Scholar
3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for preventing the spread of vancomycin resistance: recommendations of the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). MMWR 1995;44(RR12):113.Google Scholar
4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci (VRE) andine Clinical Laboratory Atlanta, GACenters for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at www.cdc.gov/ncidod/liip/Lab/FactSheet/vre. htm. Accessed August 27,2002.Google Scholar
5.D'Agata, EMC, Gautam, S, Green, WK, et al.High rate of false-negative results of the rectal swab culture method in detection of gastrointestinal colonization with van-comycin-resistant enterococci. Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:167172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed